User talk:Xuesnow

Reversion of your edits at Right to be forgotten
Hey there, just to let you know, I undid your recent edits to Right to be forgotten for a couple reasons: If you do think there are good reasons for removing some of that content (e.g. if you think the sources are low-quality journal-spam), feel free to re-do the removals, but please give a more detailed rationale for the removal in your edit summary (you can also discuss it in more depth on the article's talk page) and be mindful of preserving the integrity of the surrounding text. Cheers. (And welcome to Wikipedia!) Colin M (talk) 19:29, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) In some cases your removals led to incongruities with the text that followed. For example, the sentence beginning This, critics have claimed, would require companies to take down any information... no longer makes sense once the previous sentence (which gives the thing that "this" refers to) is removed.
 * 2) Based on your edit summaries, I couldn't see a rationale for removing sourced information.