User talk:Xulios

January 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Talk:Yahweh, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 00:45, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

I will make know the sacrilegious blasphemy to the defenders OF God Xulios (talk) 00:54, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

I’m not a sock puppet I’m a servant of the God Yahweh. The page of Yahweh is deceptive, inaccurate and sacrilegious blasphemy. Why non Servants of God have control of this page is beyond my Comprehension. Xulios (talk) 01:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Tgeorgescu (talk) 00:57, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

I’m not a sock puppet I’m a servant of the God Yahweh. The page of Yahweh is deceptive, inaccurate and sacrilegious blasphemy. Why non Servants of God have control of this page is beyond my Comprehension. And will not stand While God let’s breath fill my lungs!! Xulios (talk) 01:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Yahweh. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 00:58, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

The page of Yahweh is deceptive, inaccurate and sacrilegious blasphemy. Why non Servants of God have control of this page is beyond my Comprehension. Xulios (talk) 01:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Xulios, you may be blocked from editing. Tgeorgescu (talk) 01:12, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Yahweh. Tgeorgescu (talk) 01:19, 14 January 2020 (UTC)


 * If you have concerns that the article Yahweh is misrepresentative of that Iron- and Bronze Age deity, please be more descriptive. However, please accept that there is a name collision at that title, and Wikipedia naming policy says that the older god gets the Yahweh title; on the other hand, the hatnote points to God in Judaism and God in Abrahamic religions, articles which cover God, who is known by Yahweh, among other names.
 * On the other hand, if you're here just to fuss that the Judeo-Christian God doesn't get exclusive coverage at this title, please stop. Wikipedia is not the place for that kind of practice. Or, to borrow something I've heard several priests and deacons say, it's time for you to go in peace to serve the Lord. —C.Fred (talk) 01:34, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Just to clarify I just called no one names
I just don’t think that a atheist should control the page or stop the edits of true believers. Xulios (talk) 01:38, 14 January 2020 (UTC)


 * On the one hand, there is no religious qualification test to edit any articles. On the other hand, if a "true believer" is so influenced by their beliefs that they cannot maintain neutral point of view, then they should not be editing the article. —C.Fred (talk) 01:45, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. N.J.A.  &#124; talk  01:46, 14 January 2020 (UTC)