User talk:Xulu8

License tagging for Image:Otggs.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Otggs.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 01:08, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 07:48, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Zoom Airlines
Based on this edit I assume that you are the Zoom employee but now with an account. Could you please take some time to read Conflict of interest and Citing sources. Please don't add material that is unsourced.

Please tak a look at the differences between the sourced and unsourced versions. The fleet size of 5 is not supported by any sources but both Transport Canada and www.airfleets.net show a fleet of 4. The information may be out of date but it is sourced. Again the number of destinations at 16 is directly from the Zoom website so 14 would need a source. The UK Zoom fleet and destinations need sources that is why the fact tag is there so please don't remove it. If you look at Air Canada you will see that it's standard to have the callsign in all capitals. Also once the company name has been bolded it is not the standard to bold it again. Please take a look at Air Canada destinations which shows how to list them. The cities should be linked and the airport links should go directly to the airport article eg "Manchester Airport" and not "Manchester International Airport". Also there is no London Gatwick Airport - South article instead there is London Gatwick Airport and that is the correct link. If you look at the Gatwick article there is a South Terminal section and Zoom is listed there. The fleet age at www.airfleets.net is based only on the 4 767's and does not include the two upcoming aircraft.

Of course if all of the changes can be sourced then the article can be changed and the sources given. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 07:48, 3 May 2007 (UTC)


 * OK. I've added the 757 into the box. Sorry about the city order, I have no idea why I keep putting them alphabetically. You're not the first person to remind me of that. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 18:17, 3 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry I don't understand your last remark. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 18:23, 3 May 2007 (UTC)


 * No problem. I tried to save this page first so you would see the explanation. Just crossed up. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 18:30, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Zoom
It appears that another editor has protected the page. So it's best to use Talk:Zoom Airlines to talk about it. One thing I see is that the reference for the Scottish company says they have no aircraft. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 06:50, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank for your comments on my user page can I refer you to Assume good faith.MilborneOne 08:32, 4 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Just to let you know that a separate article for Zoom Airlines Limited has been created and is developing nicely. Just wanted to emphasis my only point was that the UK airline needed a separate article, and welcome your contributions to the new article. Hope you will agree our aims are the same - to provide accurate and citable information for readers and users. MilborneOne 21:38, 10 May 2007 (UTC)