User talk:Xussman3

AfC notification: Draft:Muhammad Labib has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Muhammad Labib. Thanks!  Nitesh003 (TALK)  08:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muhammad Labib (November 1)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Muhammad_Labib Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Worldbruce was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: As noted by Nitesh003, IMDb is not an acceptable source for any of this. Searches of The Daily Star, The Independent, Dhaka Tribune, New Age, bdnews24.com, The Daily Observer, Daily Sun, Prothom Alo, Bangladesh Pratidin, Kaler Kantho, Manab Zamin, banglanews24.com, Daily Naya Diganta, Jago News 24, ... found zero mentions of this individual. Wikipedia is not for any kind of publicity, promotion, or public relations.

Worldbruce (talk) 23:05, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Md.labibsikder&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Md.labibsikder. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:41, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Muhammad Labib


A tag has been placed on Draft:Muhammad Labib, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 15:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)