User talk:XxCam i amxX

November 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Elmer Holmes Bobst, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:52, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Since the material you are removing from Elmer Holmes Bobst is properly sourced, you need to explain (at the very least in your edit summary, but better yet on the article's talk page) why you are deleting it. Normally, information that is accompanied by a citation to a reliable source should not be removed unless for policy reasons or with the consensus agreement of other editors.  The frist step to getting a consensus is to explain on the talk page why you are trying to remove the information.  Please do not continue to remove the material from the article, as continuing to do so could get you blocked from editing.  I look forward to seeing your explanation on the article talk page. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:37, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Another editor removed some unsourced information from the article, which you restored - but that is not how things are done here. If information is unsourced, and an editor removes it, to restore it to the article you must provide a source for that information.  I took it open myself to check to see if the information was easily sourcable, and I could find nothing in a Google search to indicate that the one granddaughter was an advocate for the multiply handicapped.  That, of course, doesn't mean that it's not true, it simply means that I could find nothing to confirm it.  Bearing in mind that your own personal knowledge is not acceptable as a support for contentious information (see our policy on original research), if you have a citation from a reliable source to support it, you're welcome to restore the information with that citation.  In the meantime, though, please do not restore it. Also, you have once again deleted sourced information from the article.  As I mentioned above, this is not allowed, and can get you into trouble. Please stop. Finally, your (clearly) strong feeling about this article makes me believe that it's possible you might have a conflict of interest regarding it.  Please remember that it's Wikipedia's policy that all our articles must maintain a neutral point of view.  To this end, I suggest that you read our policy on editing with a conflict of interest and follow the pointers there.  Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:32, 6 December 2012 (UTC)