User talk:Xxreibearxx

Xxreibearxx (talk) 20:04, 22 June 2015 https://www.facebook.com/shayla.smith.9406 <--Fiancee and manager and source

Welcome!
Hello, Xxreibearxx, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Christopher Khayman Lee has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:47, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Xxreibearxx. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Christopher Khayman Lee, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. ''Your edit summary implies you have an external relationship with Christopher Khayman Lee- instead of directly editing, it's strongly encouraged to suggest changes at the article talkpage. Also, he doesn't own the Wikipedia article about him, per WP:OWN.'' Joseph2302 (talk) 19:49, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Christopher Khayman Lee, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''You need to provide reliable sources to support your claims. Just so you know, "he told me so" isn't a reliable source, see WP:Identifying reliable sources for what is acceptable.'' Joseph2302 (talk) 20:23, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

response
the words I told you so where not used. there are NO KNOWN ACCURATE SOURCES other than the man himself. Whoever created the page has incorrect source material.


 * Like I just said above:


 * 1) "He says it's true" isn't a reliable source- see WP:Identifying reliable sources for what is actually a reliable source. If all reliable sources contradict what he says to be true, then Wikipedia will have what the reliable sources say, a they are actually verifiable.
 * 2) He doesn't own the Wikipedia article about himself, per WP:OWN, so you cannot dictate what can or cannot be in the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:48, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Taking words out of context. As I have stated above the reliable sources are not reliable. Therefore if this is going to be an issue then the page should be taken down and we will rectify the issue. No one stated that he owned the page, however not allowing the correction of certain information that is inaccurate or incorrect seems hypocritical...again I shall have him contact wikipedia and rectify this issue since there are currently NO CORRECT SOURCE AVAILABLE


 * No, you say it's incorrect, but no reliable sources agree with you, therefore according to Wikipedia's verifiability, the information is correct. Just because you say it's wrong doesn't make it wrong. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:57, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

I understand what you are saying. That is not the issue. The issue is that all the known sources are incorrect. As you said just because I say it is wrong doesn't make it wrong, but saying it is right doesn't either. I can understand disputing the major change I attempted to do but at least correct the birthplace and include his current project which i did include as an external link which is a source and his official youtube channel which is another known source.

Xxreibearxx, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure