User talk:Xxtool420xx

Welcome!

Hello, Xxtool420xx, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! - J Greb (talk) 21:41, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Superboy and -5-
A few things here: - J Greb (talk) 22:03, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Editing and discusion should be done in a civil manner. Your edit here was incivil in multiple ways. While you did retract the bulk of it 10 minutes later, you still should have though it through before posting.
 * Even then, your post still has problems - "Who do you think you are?" is a poor choice of section title. It's baiting and belitteling.
 * Additionally, when you go to comment on an editor's contributions or edits, stick to the content of their edits. Do not indulge in personal attacks. In addition to baiting and belitteling, the title you cose to use on -5-'s user talk page also falls under the defintion of "personal attack". And the last three lines, part of what you retracted, are much worse in this repsect. Peppering your posts with comments or attacks like that can result in you ability to edit being susspended for periods of time.
 * Superboy (Kon-El) - The edit you are trying to preserve, whether you introduced it editing under 64.223.87.147 or not, is broken. Period.
 * What is being removed identifies the person quoted in the following line. That removal harms the section.
 * The interview that is mentioned hppened after the new series was announced, but before the first issue actually going on sale. Your prefered wording implies that the interview happend after or, at best, at the time the series launced.
 * Yes, the tense of the old scentence needs to be tweaked, but not removed. The announcemnt is just as important as DC following through on it.
 * The tone of noting the new series went on sale on Nov 3 also needs to be tweaked. As it stands it is very stilted.