User talk:Xxxuwecxxx

Welcome!
Hello, Xxxuwecxxx, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Hotdish, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * FAQ for Organizations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorials
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome!  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  19:11, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Hotdish. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''This language is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. Are you being paid by the restaurant to add this content?  Julietdeltalima   (talk) '' 19:23, 22 June 2022 (UTC)


 * This is a factual statement that further explains the evolution of Tater Hot Dish in Minnesota. See the article on Jucy Lucy burgers here.  This is no different. xxxuwecxxx (talk) 19:26, 22 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Wrong. It's not written from a neutral point of view ("for future generations to enjoy" is entirely inappropriate language for an encyclopedia). Jucy Lucy is a well-documented article with reliable third-party sources establishing the notability of a particular food. Your only source here is an inline external link, which is not acceptable in any event, to the website of a non-notable restaurant.  This is not allowable, especially given the unencyclopedic language in promotional tone.  Again, are you being paid to do this? -  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  20:56, 22 June 2022 (UTC)


 * I've removed the promotional content again. If you continue to restore it, you may be blocked from editing.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:02, 22 June 2022 (UTC)