User talk:Xylempho

April 2019
Hello, I'm Eagles247. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Alliance of American Football have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  22:56, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, I don't need help from Eagle's fan. Xylempho (talk) 17:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Taxation as theft. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ahunt (talk) 23:52, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

It's not a unconstructive edit to remove an opinion when that opinion is citing another op/ed article as support. Especially when it's the opinion of an already biased publication.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/extranewsfeed/ Xylempho (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Taxation as theft, you may be blocked from editing. Ahunt (talk) 00:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Let's take it to that next level then. You are using the vandalists threat as a bullying tactic. Taking the opinion out of this encyclopedia reference does nothing but strengthen the validity of the wikipedia project. Find a better source. The information does not change by taking out the bias. Xylempho (talk) 01:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Taxation as theft. Ahunt (talk) 01:04, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Taxation as theft; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. RedPanda25 01:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.