User talk:Xymmax/Archives/2010/January

Prod removal (reply)
Sorry, I was looking at this:

"You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. However please explain why you object to the deletion."

I just thought it was randomly taken down without reason. I guess I won't do that again. Seems like Ironholds nominated it for deletion anyway.

Bgmur (talk) 16:34, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * No reason to apologize, I understand your thinking. I guess the way I look at it is that prods are best reserved for 100% uncontested deletions. Anyone can get a prodded article undeleted on demand if they ask, and there's nothing to stop someone from recreating the article. If the subject is one that is likely to simply be recreated, (and I suspect actors in the "adult entertainment" industry fall into this category) I'd just as soon get a binding opinion at AfD. I think it saves work in the long run. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  13:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Bohdanow article
Greetings,

I saw new comments on my article and I must say Im somehow surprised! First of all, I created this article to follow it up later on so it was just a beginning of it. Then I saw some comments on delating or not of people that cannot find simple links to the sources witch makes me wonder. Why they do not find sources that are easily to be found? So I wrote comments on those comments and pas the links that they cannot find.

Then I find that the discussion follow up and there are still people that want to delate the article. I find this very sad to see!

I now wrote some more on the article and hope that this will stop people fooling around here making those intelligent comments on something that being just a start of the article.

When I then asked for help on other article i've made since im just learning how to create those articles in proper way, there is no one that seems be interested of giving help. The only interest I see so far is that people love to make those comments and play God in this place! Is this in line with the Wiki policy!?

Sincerely, Camdan (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:36, 20 January 2010 (UTC).
 * I understand how you feel. All of us were new editors once, but we sometimes forget how it felt. I have no interest in deleting your article, but I thought that it did not (in the form it was then) meet the notability standard to have a separate article. However, because I saw a lot of potential, I recommended incubation in which an article is improved outside of mainspace, then returns as a mature article that meets content policies. Good luck to you. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  00:01, 24 January 2010 (UTC)