User talk:Y00tu

April 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Report of Van Fleet Mission to Far East appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this. Thank you. Please read WP:SOAP and VANK is not a RS. Oda Mari (talk) 13:57, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The source is not Vank. The State Department report is source. --Y00tu (talk) 13:58, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Report of Van Fleet Mission to Far East. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 14:00, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * No original research. Adding State Department report is not original research. Please explain why remove entire article The article existed long before my edit. --Y00tu (talk) 14:03, 4 April 2012 (UTC)


 * You didnt add a state department report, you added an editorial from the Korea Herald. As I explained on the article talk page, I don't think that's a reliable source; even if it is, the section would have to be radically shorter and phrased completely differently.
 * In any event, you have no reverted on that article 3 times in the last 24 hours. If you revert again, you will break WP:3RR, which is a strict rule that says that you can't revert more  than 3 times in 24 hours. If you revert again, I will request that  you be blocked. Even after 24 hours, though, you can't just keep reverting because you are certain you are right. You need to go to the article talk page and discuss the issue. Please explain there how this article meets WP:RS]; if we agree it does, then we can work together to find a wording compliant with WP:NPOV. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:38, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Oda Mari (talk) 14:44, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Report of Van Fleet Mission to Far East, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please learn more about WP and do not add Korean POV on the report article. The second link is inappropriate as the topic is the LR dispute and no mention about the report. It would be WP:OR.'' Oda Mari (talk) 20:09, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * You confuse meaning of Neutral point of view, POV. The US state deaprtment report is not KPOV. --Y00tu (talk) 21:02, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:52, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Wow. This is too much. I can not say anymore. --Y00tu (talk) 21:53, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
For your information: Sockpuppet investigations/Truesight The Banner talk 18:42, 11 August 2012 (UTC)


 * What is wrong? he is not me.

Rusk Document
After unblock, Can you join in Edit of Rusk Documents ? --Ejwcun (talk) 20:04, 11 August 2012 (UTC)