User talk:YASH2004D

Welcome!
Hello, YASH2004D, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 13:03, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Dwarka
I've reverted you. Sorry, but that's nonsense. Nothing in our article on Dwarka suggests it is that old, and if it was submerged then it wasn't continuously inhabited, right? Doug Weller talk 13:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Yes bro actually the citation I wanted to input was not accepted by Wikipedia so I had to put that information without any proofs. But here I can tell you that according to the excavations at gulf of Cambay coins dating 9500 years ago were discovered, also carbon dating of discovered materials , bones and teeth suggest they are 10000 years old. Ancient texts tell that Dwarka sunk into the sea 36 years after the kurukshetra war. So this puts both the kurukshetra war and Prosperous Dwarka city 10000 years ago. I am unable to input the citations in Wikipedia due to some errors. Maybe you yourself after carrying out some research can help me out with Wikipedia recognising this. YASH2004D (talk) 13:26, 19 April 2022 (UTC)


 * That's a ridiculous age for coins. Our article on this is at Marine archaeology in the Gulf of Cambay. And again, that doesn't prove a city existed there, and even if it did, which is extremely unlikely, it wasn't continuously inhabited until today. You must know that. Doug Weller  talk 15:28, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

The information links you gave, did give me more knowledge than earlier about the excavation. They clearly mention about how old the submerged city was. Even if you try to disbelieve it ( due to your own personal interests or hatred towards discoveries in our area ), it has to be noticed that whatever civilisation you may call ,it dates thousands of year back than Harappan civilisation. So doesn't it deserve to be known as oldest civilization even though there are disputes about its perfect age ?? YASH2004D (talk) 17:50, 19 April 2022 (UTC)


 * You just changed the issue. Now it’s a civilisation? How is that? Doug Weller  talk 17:57, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, note the comment about it looking Harappan. Doug Weller  talk 17:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

The question you ask that how is it a civilisation brings to my notice that you have no idea about the mighty empire of Dwarka. In fact at the time Dwarka existed other territorial empires were also existing so no doubt that people here in that time were very much advanced. May it look like Harappan they are from different times and also different sites. I don't know about you but many people here try to delete such type of histories which glorify traditional India. YASH2004D (talk) 18:30, 19 April 2022 (UTC)


 * What are the names of these empires and where can I read about them in academic publications, in English as that’s the only language I read well, sadly. It doesn’t seem as though we have articles on them.. This all sounds like nationalist archaeology. Doug Weller  talk 19:30, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Although I suspect it’s not based primarily on archaeology. Doug Weller  talk 20:08, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

You didn't introduce yourself ?? Nice to meet you YASH2004D (talk) 18:30, 19 April 2022 (UTC)


 * And you. My user page has some info about me. Doug Weller  talk 20:08, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

There are many ancient texts that have information on Dwarka but Mahabharata epic epic is the prominent one. Mahabharata is available in English translations. YASH2004D (talk) 03:14, 20 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Yes, but it’s not archaeology and only about 2500 years old. Doug Weller  talk 06:27, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

How can you say that it is 2500 years old ? The excavation says that the city is older than harappan and Mahabharata happened 36 years before the submergence of that city. 2500 years from now would put Mahabharata in 500 BC Which will definitely not create any sense YASH2004D (talk) 06:41, 20 April 2022 (UTC)