User talk:YOUNGERVHARRISISBAD

Welcome!
Hello, YOUNGERVHARRISISBAD, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 02:23, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * FAQ for Organizations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

April 2016
Hello. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Younger v. Harris seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GABHello! 02:12, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Younger v. Harris. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Not only does it look like you're editing from a non-neutral point of view, but it also looks like you're spamming your blog. —C.Fred (talk) 02:22, 16 April 2016 (UTC)


 * You really have no idea what you're talking about. The article is a law review style analysis of the case and it deserves to be on the site. So leave it alone of format it the way you see fit, but leave it up.


 * Sorry, with no citations of its sources, it falls well short of the WP:EL hurdle. It can't stay up. —C.Fred (talk) 02:30, 16 April 2016 (UTC)