User talk:Yajeepms

Reblocked indefinitely
About a half hour after being unblocked by Edgar181, you decided to post this "WikiLove" message at the user talk page that led to your previous block. This kind of edit is completely and totally inappropriate, especially for someone who just came off a block for posting harassing/intimidating messages at that same user talk page. Since your disruptive behavior resumed almost immediately, I have restored an indefinite block on this account. As before, you can appeal the block using the unblock template, but note that you'll need a solid rationale; your previous unblock experience was a little disruptive and unproductive. only (talk) 13:35, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

I disagree that my last unblock experience was "unproductive"; I quickly started work on another article almost straight away.

In your last unblock request, you pledged not to do it again. A half hour after an unblock, you were disruptive again. Why should we believe you this time that you won't "do it again"? only (talk) 13:45, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

I was congratulating User: Swpb. I will not congratulate him again.
 * There is absolutely no way that anyone would take your message to Swpb as anything positive. -- GB fan 15:47, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

I clicked the send WikiLove button, therefore it is positive. I was congratulating him on suppressing Austrian culture on Wikipedia for under 18 hours, which is a fine achievement.
 * How you add something does not make something positive. It is the message that is sent that makes things positive.  Your message to Swpb was not positive at all.  Based on your attitude, don't expect to get unblocked anytime soon.  -- GB fan 16:02, 24 December 2014 (UTC)


 * First of all, do not modify closed unblock requests. Secondly, reposting a nearly identical unblock request to the most recently declined one is not a sound strategy.  We don't need an "Austria Promotion" account. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 16:14, 24 December 2014 (UTC)