User talk:Yak

Welcome! You did a great job with Cassia
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.

You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!


 * If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.


 * You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: . If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.


 * If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Again, welcome! Sennheiser! 15:00, 8 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Deer
Take a look at my changes for Persian Fallow Deer and Fallow Deer. Also, no need to make links like Dama dama. One the species level or lower we always use the common name. On higher levels we'll use either the common or the scientific name or both. (See Deer and Cervidae, for instance.) You may be interested in WikiProject Tree of Life. - UtherSRG 19:15, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Griffin
Nice looking griffin page now, Yak. Can you format Herculaneum? It's begging for formatting. Stuff'a all right there. I'm too dumb.Wetman 15:43, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)

me too, I just copied a nice looking format from another page --Yak 16:04, Feb 20, 2004 (UTC)


 * Always a good technique :) Say, at Philistines tell us what's in Claude Vandersleyen, "Keftiu: a cautionary note." Oxford Journal of Archaeology that you entered! Wetman 00:21, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Hazel
Hi Yak, re your query on Talk:Hazel Is the hazel a tree?
 * Yes, some are, notably Turkish hazel (Corylus colurna), which can reach over 30m tall with a trunk over 1.2m diameter - MPF 23:33, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)

lentil, vetch and pistachio
Nice to see the notes on ancient use of these plants. Keep it up! WormRunner | Talk 21:01, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)

History of Cyprus
Wow, lots of great info. Nice work. --Mmm 09:32, Mar 31, 2004 (UTC)

Deposit
Hi Yak, I've changed your definition of deposit as it is wider than originally described. adamsan 19:26, 14 May 2004 (UTC)

Image license
Hi Yak,

We use Image:Dattelpalme.jpg on the German Wikipedia. Could you please clarify its licensing status, so that we can keep it there without any future problems? Thanks in advance, --zeno 10:09, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)


 * Danke für die schnelle Antwort. Ist es dann GFDL? --zeno 10:25, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * ja

--Yak 10:37, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Noch eine Frage: Bist Du auch auf der deutschen Wikipedia als "Yak" bekannt? Es wurden nämlich gerade zwei Bilder dieses Benutzers zum Löschen vorgeschlagen. Wenn die Bilder von Dir sind, sage mir bitte Bescheid, oder hinterlasse einen Kommentar auf de:Wikipedia:Bilder_ohne_Lizenzangabe/Y.

ciao, --zeno 10:54, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Image
What is the copyright status of Image:TrimCastleNorman.jpg? David Remahl 15:01, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)

What is the image license for...
Image:WhitecliffsDover.jpg? ed g2s &bull;  talk  01:02, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Image:Aswadpoint.jpg
Guten Tag! Thanks for uploading Image:Aswadpoint.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GFDL, or  if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much,   – Quadell (talk) (help)   14:05, Nov 7, 2004 (UTC)

Another image tag
Image:WhitecliffsDover.jpg needs a tag, Evil Monkey &rarr; Talk 06:35, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Unverified images
Hi! Thanks for uploading the following image:


 * Image:Delphinium.jpg

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GNU Free Documentation License,  if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk, automation script)]] 05:13, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)

P.S. You can help tag other images at User:Yann/Untagged_Images. Thanks again.

Image:Famagusta.jpg
Hi! Thanks for uploading Image:Famagusta.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have a image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GFDL, or  if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, Chris j wood 14:26, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Unverified images
Hi! Thanks for uploading the following images:


 * Image:DunbegDingleDet.jpg
 * Image:DunbrodyAbbey.jpg
 * Image:DyeCurcuma.jpg
 * Image:DysertODeaHighCross.jpg

I notice they currently don't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to each to let us know its copyright status?

You can use   if you release your own work under the GNU Free Documentation License,    if you wish to release your own work to the public domain,    if you claim fair use, and so on. Click here for a list of the various tags.

If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page where you got the image from, and I'll tag it for you. Thanks so much. Denni &#9775; 04:23, 2004 Dec 13 (UTC)

P.S. You can help tag other images at Untagged_Images. Thanks again.

Also:
 * Image:Kantara.jpg - Kbh3rd 13:57, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Image:KapeArkona.jpg
 * Image:Karop.jpg
 * Image:Kastros.jpg
 * Image:Pastinak2.jpg
 * Image:CragganowenEingang.jpg - I've marked this as   for now. --MaxPower 15:47, 2004 Dec 22 (UTC)

ALSO:
 * Image:KnidosKriegshafen.jpg
 * Image:Pfahlbau.jpg RedWolf 21:42, Dec 30, 2004 (UTC)
 * Image:BesParnakFlag.jpg RedWolf 22:37, Dec 31, 2004 (UTC)

AND:
 * Image:Unileipzig.jpg - Kbh3rd 01:55, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Neuhaldenslebener Forst.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Neuhaldenslebener Forst.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GFDL, or  if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Right now, I'll put it as unverified, but change it to what it's supposed to be when you get a chance. Thanks, Mattingly23 15:41, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Image:Halle4Faeuste.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Halle4Faeuste.jpg. Please leave a note on that page about where you got the image or whether you made it yourself because of copyright law. If you have any questions, just leave a message on my talk page. --Ellmist 15:12, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Image:HalleSaline.jpg
The same applies to Image:HalleSaline.jpg. Thank you. --Ellmist 15:14, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Image:MaesHoweOrkney.jpg
I uploaded a few pictures of the tomb Maeshowe I took this summer. Maybe you'd like to replace the old picture, that seems to have an unkowns source Cheers, Tbc2 00:02, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Image:ApelsteinReudnitz.jpg
Burgundavia (&#9992; take a flight?) 05:36, May 24, 2005 (UTC)

Image tagging
Greetings. You may not have seen this, but images that are not properly tagged or sourced are now candidates for speedy deletion. I see you've had several warnings before to do this, and looking through some of the images you've uploaded many of them are not tagged. Since you have so many images I though I might warn you so you have time to label them. Please tag these images properly with source and license information, or they will be deleted. If you're not sure how, I or someone at the Help Desk will gladly help you. Thanks, Mindspillage (spill yours?) 07:20, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

Image:GudeaLagasch.jpg
What about the Licence of this Picture? I would like to use it in the german Wikipedia - but there's it only possible as free Picture. Kenwilliams 19:26, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:MaesHoweOrkney.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MaesHoweOrkney.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use or fairuse. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by going to "Your contributions" from your user page and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much.

Additionally I have removed this photo from the Maeshowe article, since it is now redundant to two other photos which do have source/copyright information. Thanks/wangi

Piyashshili
Hi Yak, I'd appreciate an answer on Talk: Piyashshili nl:Gebruiker:Jcwf

Unspecified source for Image:DyeCurcuma.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DyeCurcuma.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 04:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Pomeranian culture
Hi,

I noticed you are the main editor of the article Pomeranian culture. Can you please provide the sources on which the article is based. I would like to translate it for the Slovenian wikipedia. However, I would like to have it supported with verifiable sources.

Regards, Jalen 21:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bloody Stupid Johnson
I have nominated Bloody Stupid Johnson, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Bloody Stupid Johnson. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 23:12, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Voelkerschlacht.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Voelkerschlacht.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Dattelpalme.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dattelpalme.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

File:El Khiam.jpg
Hi, a file you uploaded a long time ago (El Khiam, a schematic drawing of a spearhead, has been moved to commons, and I would just like to ask if you are the creator of this file, or if you got it from somewhere else. If you could add the information into the description of the image, that would be perfect. You can also answer here if you like. Thanks. Deadstar (talk) 08:00, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Huehner.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Huehner.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:17, 12 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:17, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Halle4Faeuste.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Halle4Faeuste.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.

File:HalleSaline.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HalleSaline.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.

File source problem with File:Heidenmauer.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Heidenmauer.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:57, 21 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 02:57, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

File:DunbrodyAbbey.jpg needs authorship information.
Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:DunbrodyAbbey.jpg is missing information as to its authorship (and or source) , or if such information is provided it is confusing.

Although images may not need author information in un-controversial cases, or where an applicable source is provided, such information aids those making use of the image, and helps verify the copyright status of an image.

If possible, please consider updating the media information page to make the authorship (and or source) of this media clearer.

If the media is your own work, please consider explicitly including your user name or using the own template on the media information page.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:06, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:DunbrodyAbbey.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:DunbrodyAbbey.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 06:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Yak. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Yak~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 03:58, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:UKRazor.jpg


The file File:UKRazor.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, no need for a diagram when we have File:GBM - Urnenfelder 1a Rasiermesser.jpg"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 17:26, 30 July 2019 (UTC)