User talk:Yalda22

Welcome!
Hello, Yalda22, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Please add goals to the Talk page
Hi, I see your group chose to edit HPV vaccine, however there are no editing goals currently posted to the Talk page. Please update. Health policy (talk) 04:09, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia! We have compiled some guidance for new healthcare editors:
 * 1) Please keep the mission of Wikipedia in mind. We provide the public with accepted knowledge, working in a community.
 * 2) We do that by finding high quality secondary sources and summarizing what they say, giving WP:WEIGHT as they do.  Please do not try to build content by synthesizing content based on primary sources.
 * 3) Please use high-quality, recent, secondary sources for medical content (see WP:MEDRS; for the difference between primary and secondary sources, see the WP:MEDDEF section.) High-quality sources include review articles (which are not the same as peer-reviewed), position statements from nationally and internationally recognized bodies (like CDC, WHO, FDA), and major medical textbooks. Lower-quality sources are typically removed. Please beware of predatory publishers – check the publishers of articles (especially open source articles) at Beall's list.
 * 4) The ordering of sections typically follows the instructions at WP:MEDMOS. The section above the table of contents is called the WP:LEAD. It summarizes the body. Do not add anything to the lead that is not in the body. Style is covered in MEDMOS as well; we avoid the word "patient" for example.
 * 5) We don't use terms like "currently", "recently," "now", or "today". See WP:RELTIME.
 * 6) More generally see WP:MEDHOW, which gives great tips for editing about health -- for example, it provides a way to format citations quickly and easily
 * 7) Citation details are important:
 * 8) *Be sure cite the PMID for journal articles and ISBN for books
 * 9) *Please include page numbers when referencing a book or long journal article, and please format citations consistently within an article.
 * 10) *Do not use URLs from your university library that have "proxy" in them: the rest of the world cannot see them.
 * 11) *Reference tags generally go after punctuation, not before; there is no preceding space.
 * 12) We use very few capital letters (see WP:MOSCAPS) and very little bolding. Only the first word of a heading is usually capitalized.
 * 13) Common terms are not usually wikilinked; nor are years, dates, or names of countries and major cities. Avoid overlinking!
 * 14) Never copy and paste from sources; we run detection software on new edits.
 * 15) Talk to us! Wikipedia works by collaboration at articles and user talkpages.

Once again, welcome, and thank you for joining us! Please share these guidelines with other new editors.

– the WikiProject Medicine team Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 08:03, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Support from WikEdu
User:Shalor (Wiki Ed) can you provide some details here? Also Yalda please familiarize yourself with WP:3RR Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 20:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello, trying to modify my sources, however now I cannot do so. Also don't understand what MusikAnimal's vague statement or what is considered to be constructive statement. Thanks. Yalda22 (talk) 21:03, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay have you read what has been posted above? Can you please use high quality secondary sources. Also please read WP:MEDMOS regarding formating. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 21:07, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

What is unclear to me is why there are no in detail discussions of the studies completed which FDA referenced in approving expansion of age for vaccination? Indeed they are primary sources, however these are the studies FDA utilized and referenced during approval. This was my goal with the addition of my initial edit and subsection, was to include the sources for studies which FDA referenced in their summary basis for regulatory action. In the current content of this article it references that FDA approved expansion of age and indication for Gardasil 9, but missing information and necessary discussion of how FDA came to approve vaccine implementation for females and males aged 27-45, which would entail discussing the clinical literature and findings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yalda22 (talk • contribs) 23:31, August 7, 2019 (UTC)

You added
"On October 5, 2018, Food and Drug Administration released a summary basis for regulatory action and approval for expansion of usage and indication for the usage of Gardasil 9 to include men and women 27 to 45 years of age ."

Can you provide a direct quote from this source that supports the text in question? I am just not seeing it. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

https://www.fda.gov/media/117054/download
 * That was not the source you used. The source you used was https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(19)30298-3/abstract How does that support the content you added? Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 21:37, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

What is unclear to me is why there are no in detail discussions of the studies completed which FDA referenced in approving expansion of age for vaccination? Indeed they are primary sources, however these are the studies FDA utilized and referenced during approval. This was my goal with the addition of my initial edit and subsection, was to include the sources for studies which FDA referenced in their summary basis for regulatory action. In the current content of this article it references that FDA approved expansion of age and indication for Gardasil 9, but missing information and necessary discussion of how FDA came to approve vaccine implementation for females and males aged 27-45, which would entail discussing the clinical literature and findings.
 * First with respect to the Lancet? I am trying to figure out why you used that source? Was it simple a mistake? Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 05:17, 8 August 2019 (UTC)