User talk:Yallayallaletsgo/Archive 3

Proposed deletion of All Natural Food Zone


The article All Natural Food Zone has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No reliably sourced sign of notability. Alexa lists only two inbound links, site rank over 9 million. No gnews hits for "All Natural Food Zone" or allnaturalfoodzone.blogspot.com. Ghits are almost all self-generated, nothing of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 13:41, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of All Natural Food Zone for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article All Natural Food Zone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/All Natural Food Zone until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nat Gertler (talk) 20:08, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with All Natural Food Zone. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t &bull; c &raquo;  20:32, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with All Natural Food Zone. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Nat Gertler (talk) 20:33, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia to you as well. I removed said template as there was no entry at that time. I have been an editor for three years with this account, and with my other accounts since 2001. While I thank you for the welcome, I surely do not need it.


 * The claim that you removed the template because there was no entry at the time is false. The entry was created over fifteen minutes before you deleted the AFD tag. The claim that you are not affiliated with it is dubious; you may wish to consider retracting it if it is not so. --Nat Gertler (talk) 21:52, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at All Natural Food Zone shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:35, 25 April 2013 (UTC)