User talk:Yamamoto Ichiro/Archives/1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Welcome !
Also, thank you for reverting Vandalism on my Userpage.  xaosflux  Talk / CVU 03:17, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Japanese articles
Please stop creating articles with Japanese titles. This is English Wikipedia. --Khoikhoi 05:33, 16 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Upon further inspection, you are mostly creating redirects with the exception of 漫画. I guess this is ok, but what's the point? --Khoikhoi 05:35, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Bot
Are you a bot?? Georgia guy 00:33, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * maybe :) --山本一郎 00:35, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Nelly
Stay current ffs. don't undo my edits without asking. thx: http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/charts/chart_display.jsp?g=Singles&f=Hot+R%26B%2FHip-Hop+Songs http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/charts/chart_display.jsp?g=Singles&f=Hot+Rap+Tracks

Stop Deleting My Editing
Wikipedia is mean to be the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. All i have done is make serious contributions and u keep deleting them... PLEASE STOP —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.168.169.151 (talk • contribs)


 * I agree with the fact that wikipedia is an enyclopedia that anyone can edit. However, the chances are you have been making random edits, and it has been reverted because it is considered to be vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions to wikipedia, please try to read the help pages and read all the policies and guidelines we have for editing. --山本一郎 04:31, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my userpage ;-) &mdash;Kirill Lokshin 21:47, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No problem :) --山本一郎 22:23, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Warning templates
It is encouraged that you substitute user warning templates, which I see you haven't been doing. See Template substitution. - Royboycrashfan 22:00, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks for telling me that, I havn't read about substituting templates yet. --山本一郎 22:24, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Unsigned comment
ummmm.... read what i deleted... i am an attorney and i deleted a portion of the article that was incorrect. that is all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.152.186.159 (talk • contribs)

Hey
Hi, I noticed that you, like me, are a popup-enabled vandal whacker. You might be interested in this proposal: Community Trust. hajimemaste ... jaco desu-ka! :) Jacoplane 06:39, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

どもありがとう
Thank you for your reversion here! I got the title from here. See you around! :D --HappyCamper 17:18, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
Hey, thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page! :-)

--Activision45 19:13, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Oy...
Good job reverting Jimmy Wales - you are a good editor and deserve an award. I've been seeing a lot of you and I like what I've seen. Izehar (talk) 19:14, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

PS what does your username mean? Izehar (talk) 19:14, 18 December 2005 (UTC)


 * NP, and my name doesn't really mean anything special, just a common name really.--山本一郎 19:16, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Do you live in Japan? Izehar (talk) 19:27, 18 December 2005 (UTC)


 * I havn't been to Japan for a long time, so I really don't speak much Japanese anymore. Except maybe I can still fluently speak some phrases. I live in Canada for years now, so the language I'm most fluent at is English. --山本一郎 19:30, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Rune stones
''This message is regarding the page Viking. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - 山本一郎 21:05, 18 December 2005 (UTC)''

I contend that the removed section only served to damage Wikipedia's reputation, as it consisted - and after its re-insertion still consists - of mainly off-topic and false information. Removing content as such is not concidered vandalism according to Wikipedia's definition. The intention and effect of my removal would according to this definition be exactly the opposite. I will be back with a vengeance, however, with a text based on verifiable sources. 213.112.33.172 21:46, 18 December 2005 (UTC)Herjulf Johansen.

Thank you!
For so promptly reverting the vandalism to my page. KillerChihuahua?!? 23:08, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Unsigned Comment
Hello Yamamoto, I restored/reverted the article b/c when the previous user removed certain info, it rendered the article inaccurate. If you read the article you will see. Look at the hostory and see that the registered user just removed something that made the article factually wrong. Thanks for your understanding!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.21.157.6 (talk • contribs)

You
God loves you... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.214.32.180 (talk • contribs)
 * hmm?--山本一郎 03:12, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

I think you do a good job Mr. Ichiro. Wikicrusader 04:23, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

You beat me to it! (tidal wave article) Good job!

^^ S0z0 06:05, 19 December 2005 (UTC)s0z0

Sorry
Sorry, but he deleted my personal entry, and I was kind of hurt. I don't have that much experience with Wikipedia, but please pardon me, as I thought if he did it to me, I should retaliate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.9.163.244 (talk • contribs)

Popups assisted reversion
Hi, I have the popup script installed on my user account. How do I configure it to give me an automatic edit summary as yours has? --Adam (talk) 17:08, 19 December 2005 (UTC)


 * I have installed the popups already it is under User:Kungfuadam/cologneblue.js. My question was how I can do the edit summaries when I revert the page- ie., popups assisted reversion to revision #.--Adam (talk) 11:52, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
I noticed that you reverted my User page. Thanks. ERcheck 23:50, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for reverting the vandalism WW2 Casualties page--Berndd11222 01:09, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

65.49.144.146
afer final warning has turned attn t penis, have reverted please block

many thanks Benon 01:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Award
Hi Yamamoto,

I'm quite impressed with your RC patrolling and vandal-fighting in the last few days, and think you deserve an award:

Your signature
Hi. I've come across a lot of your vandalism reverts while on vandal patrol myself. Thanks for the help! I wanted to let you know that on most if not all of the computers that I work on your signature is rendered as little boxes showing the unicode characters as hexidecimal numbers. I put a capture here so you know what I mean. Just FYI in case you want to consider a signature more universally renderable. Thanks again for your contributions. &mdash; Kbh3rd talk 03:13, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure of the full list of fonts I have or what I might be lacking. Most characters render fine – I read Russian and a little Arabic, and those I know show up fine, and I believe I normally see Japanese and Chinese rendered correctly.  FWIW, I generally use Linux computers, but as I said, it's usually not a problem.  I'm not an expert on the subject.  Thanks. &mdash; Kbh3rd talk  03:21, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for helping revert
ags I've been keeping track of a couple pages which are in VfD - essentially, based upon what I can see, it's a record producer and a sock puppet keeping up a triad of self-promoting pages (one for the group, of no particular mention (anywhere on the Web, according to Google); one for their album; and one for himself). I saw that an IP took away a couple VfD tags, and I wanna thank you for helping put them back. D.valued 07:25, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Potential to Lock Articles
Can you do me a favor and (if you have any Administrator Privileges) lock the article The Apprentice 4 from further editing since I'm pretty much seeing an Edit War--There also has been plenty of silly edits that I'm suspecting as well. I'm not sure if you can understand what I'm saying but if so, then I would highly appreciate you locking The Apprentice 4 from editing for at least 30-60 days to deal with Edit Wars. Thanks. &mdash; Vesther 15:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Vandalism message request
Would you take a look at this and please kindly leave a message as you did when my page was vandalized before? Thanks much - KillerChihuahua?!? 01:42, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

Unsigned Comment
you said that i tried to experament. I did not experament, I was just trying to clean up a page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.165.41 (talk • contribs)
 * From the looks from |this edit, uh, sorry for experimenting message. I guess I made a mistake ;) --Ichiro 15:22, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

IRC
Hi, I saw you were on IRC yesterday - what happened? I got fed up and left early. Izehar (talk) 11:08, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Stop undoing my edits
All I'm trying to do is help the community with the most recent and most factual information, and you get me banned for "vandalism". Thank you for making community service such an enjoyable experience. It's people like you that make me wonder why I even visit this website in the first place. 67.169.182.42 21:35, 23 December 2005 (UTC)


 * If you wish to contest the block, please put on your talk page with the reason why you want to be unblocked. Also, edits that are obviously appears to be vandalism will be reverted, if you disagree, use the article talk page and state why you disagree. --Ichiro 00:27, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Veganism
What is your issue? I know what I am doing. 195.82.106.69 00:49, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

OK. User Canaen. Read it and then get back to me.
I am removing this page because it is a knowingly erroneous and dishonest libel of a Wiki user setting out to deliberately damage - and silence - a contributor to a topic by one particular opposing contributor, Viriditas, supported by two allies one of whoms constant nonconsensual revisions led to his contribution being moved off the page by consensus.

The article is on veganism. Veganism is a provocative challenge to many individuals, as is vegetarianism to a lesser degree because it makes individuals and animal industries look at themselves. It regularly attracts fanatics, trolls, propagandists of boths sides.

The libel of Canaen was started by Viriditas's associate Skinwalker based on the erroneous claim that I was at first Canaen using various anonynous IP address. Even when I wrote and made it clear to admins, even stating IP address, Viriditas associate Skinwalker continued to make their claim and use my actions against Canaen.

Now that charge has failed, they try claim that I am his meatpuppet, even insultingly calling me " Mr. Meatpuppet ". To call a vegan " meat puppet " is a equivalent to calling a black person a nigger dishonestly claiming that I became involved after Canaen posted his thoughts to a Livejournal page. I say dishonestly because I wrote to both the antagonists for their comments and to engae in rational discussion many weeks before the Livejournal postings. Even the use of the accusation of " sock puppetry " was intended to hurt and damage the credibility of those that might not actually have a fixed IP and be held as some sort of crime.

Despite my reminding them of this, they refused to withdraw the allegations. Sorry guys, the date stamps are against you and you can censor them away like Viriditas does other contribution on other's talk pages.

Let us be clear ;


 * Idleguy attemtped to stop all development of the topic and ram home criticism against vegans using statistics that were actually from sources criticism the meat industry. [ i.e. deforestation caused by increase demands of cattlefood ]. He was defeated and the criticism moved elsewhere.


 * Skinwalker is trying to ram home an agenda that associates anorexia with veganism using home page FAQs from non-vegans, discussion board material and comment about vegetarians. Consensus is that there is not sufficient evidence to relate this association with veganism. He refused to accept this and instead is using personal attacks against users to try and silence opposition to his POV.


 * Skinwalker calls us " nasty ... veggiebashers " to another contributor on their user page trying to find another ally and so I think that clearly discredits his neutrality.


 * Viriditas - who it must be said does contribute some good - sees himself as a defender of the two above's POVs and acts as self-appointed censor and revisionist - whilst refusing to engage in topic discussion or follow consensus - repeatedly revising the topic to include the above non-sequitors.

In doing so, we are suffering a tirade of erroneous and dishonest, accusations, insults, wikitrick, banning and snitches from him ; " vandall [sic] ... attacker ... troll ... POV ... sockpuppet ... meatpuppet ... harrass ". It goes on and on.

It appears, by the initial Wiki invite, that Viriditas and Skinwalker have some prior relationship. Skinwalker modus operandi is similar if not so strong.


 * So the question remains, why are the three of them continuing to attack Canaen when they know he is not their nemesis?

Canaen has been reasonable beyond the call of duty, always willing to contribute to the discuss page in a good hearted manner and engage in discussion personally as, particularly Viriditas vomits his abuse in a scatter gun attempt to discredit him.

And for the record, the only interaction user Canaen and I have had is for me to apologise for all the abuse he is receiving from Viriditas and Skinwalker on the lie that I was him.

Oh ... that and a joke about Lord Huntly's suffering at the battle at the Hill of Fare. 195.82.106.69 00:43, 24 December 2005 (UTC)


 * I have no idea what your trying to say, but from looks of it, you were engaged in edit wars. Edit wars are discouraged, and you are suppose to resolve them using talk page. You were also deleting comments other people made, such as this edit, this is blanking and it is considered to be vandalism as far as I know. --Ichiro 04:19, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Yay - Hero!
Yay! Ichiro is my hero! (No really, he is.)  Perma-awesome job! --ShakataGaNai 22:41, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

University of Miami criticism section
thanks for previously removing the vandalism from the UM page. The criticism section has been repeatedly deleted for maybe a dozen times now, and we have been having to just keep putting it back up. Finally, someone prtotected it- but with the vandalsim up (and the criticism down). If you could add your input on the discussion section it would be helpful. Thanks, jcdpi

User:Flavius Aetius
You might also check out User:Brian Brockmeyer; I've long suspected the two were sockpuppets of one another. &middot; Katefan0(scribble)/ mrp 05:28, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thank you for reverting the repeated vandalism on my user page! [[User:Xaosflux| xaosflux ] Talk / CVU 04:35, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Unsigned Comment
Ok then —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.63.33.92 (talk • contribs)

Thanks for the quick revert.
Thanks for your quick action earlier in reverting the vandalism to my userpage. Triona 05:51, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Fair enough
Maybe if you told your friends to stop deleting entries they didn\'t agree with I\'d stop vandalising their pages...after all I\'m not looking for a fight, but these people are doing nothing more than abusing Wikipedia for their own benefit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.210.68.122 (talk • contribs)


 * I'm not sure what you were doing, since your contrib is empty. However, assuming if you have vandalised a userpage or an article, it is considered to be vandalism regardless what your opinions are. If you want your opinions to be heard, do it in a much more constructive way than to be seeing as a vandal, and it won't help you being one either. --Ichiro 08:09, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

my contrib is empty because I was banned by one of your friends for vandalising his page. I respect what you are saying, and the incident only occured out of frustration with your friend, but the other stuff he kept deleting had nothing to do with vandalism or what not, I have contributed to Wikipedia for a number of years and I must say as of late that the level of vigelentism and abuse by admins is really getting out of hand, indeed I\'d argue that the corruption is nearly as bad as the open directory. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.210.68.122 (talk • contribs)


 * It might be helpful to explain what you were trying to do, because right now I have no way of telling who you were, or what articles was seen as vandalism, or what admins are abusing their power. If you don't back up with your arguments with facts, then it is nothing more than trash talk or nonsense really. --Ichiro 08:25, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for reverting my userpage for me after that IP kept messing around with it. Both times I tried to do it, you beat me to the punch! ^_^ Mo0 [ talk ] 08:43, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

User_talk:213.146.147.9
What? - CobaltBlueTony 18:52, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Sockpuppet
Hello. just to let you know I suspect User:24.186.219.3 may be a sockpuppet of User:Brian Brockmeyer,User:Almeidaisgod, User:Flavius Aetius. No Guru 07:46, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

VENDETTA
Fermatamaru means FERMATA Maru. When (s)he stops I will stop. Go ahead and ban me, I can come back as 1,000 different user-names. You're only chopping the head off of a medusa. But when (s)he stops, I will stop. Tell him/her that. Fermatamaru 02:03, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Do you seriously think that vandalising other people's userpage will help your cause? If you create multiple accounts for vandalism, we could block them quite quickly too. If you have disputes with that user, use a more constructive method instead, check Resolving_disputes.--Ichiro 02:17, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for all the reverts. And no, I have no idea why fermatamaru has launched a vendetta against me. --maru (talk) Contribs 03:34, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Stop Vandalizing
Don't vandalize my user page with your nonsense.Flavius Aetius 08:54, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Apparently, I'm not the only person who suspects you being a sock puppet. Your other two accounts used to violate the 3 reversion rule to remove the criticism section on the University of Miami article. Also, They happen to have only small amounts of edits while you were removing the section. --Ichiro 08:57, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

I have no idea what you are talking about, but you better stop.Flavius Aetius 09:05, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Look at these edits-Judging from the edit count from your accounts, they were created recently just to remove that one section in that article. Also, the edit summaries you used are very similiar. And not only that, you removed the suspencted sockpuppet notice almost at the same time too. You made this edit and this  only a few minute apart. If you dont know what sock puppet means, check the sock puppet policy. There is no direct rule against sock puppets, but from the way you used them, it's against the policy of Do not use multiple accounts to create the illusion of greater support for an issue, to mislead others, or to circumvent a block; nor ask your friends to create accounts to support you. --Ichiro 09:18, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Vandalize my page again and you will be reported. Also, you'd be wise to gain a better command of the English language.Flavius Aetius 09:21, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Do you have any argument to defend against my evidence at least?--Ichiro 09:23, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Counter, not defend, my linguistically challenged friend. And in case you hadn't noticed, I've been a user for much longer than you have and my existence also predates the little conflict you seem to have been engaged in on the University of Miami page with these other users.  This is your third and final warning: quit defacing my user page or you will be reported.  Sayonara.Flavius Aetius 09:30, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Yes, English is only my second language, and I admit that. But you still havn't "countered" my evidence yet. You are using sock puppets to "fight" with your side if this is an edit war at all. --Ichiro 09:35, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Please stop
Ichiro, please stop messing with User:Flavius Aetius's userpage, or I will block you for a 3RR violation. You have no policy backing in adding that tag and if the user in person does not consent, he is authorised to revert in perpetuity under policy whereas you have already violated the rule. Please stop. Izehar 10:00, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Apology
Ichiro, I guess you were right about Flavius being a sockpuppet, I apologise for swooping down on you like that after his complaint on WP:AIV. Sumimasen. Izehar 00:05, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * That's big of you Izehar, but you were actually in the right, in general. Folks can do as they please with their user pages, and until a checkuser is done, the sockpuppet tag is mostly useless (folks don't like having it there, as you can see)!  Sorry to butt in. &middot; Katefan0(scribble)/ mrp 04:49, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Results of checkuser
24.186.219.3 = 66.254.232.219 = Brian Brockmeyer = Almeidaisgod = Flavius Aetius Fred Bauder 18:09, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Vandal
FYI, I just blocked User:172.202.35.46 for 24 hours for personal attacks and vandalism. &middot; Katefan0(scribble)/ mrp 19:34, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Unsigned Comment
it was a week ago i did thata bit late aren't we? &mdash;the preceding unsigned comment is by 68.9.138.84 (talk &bull; contribs)

Not removing. Editing an entry laced with false data with verified facts.

thanks
Thanks for your help in monitoring my user page. The would-be vandal was quite peeved with me for listing a page she's helping to write in afd, so I left her a note that hopefully will explain that I mean no animosity. --Mareino 15:01, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

message p....... B...
the p........ b... copyright problem has been resolved

please remove the text notices. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.62.104.50 (talk • contribs)

ICHIRO, IM FROM HAKUI
, since VANDALISM is a crime (as im sure youronline witchcraftpedia tells yous mugs) i was wondering if i committed a crime for my practical jokings! i hope im not going to jail *SCARED FACE*! PS WHERE CAN I G ET A BARNSTAR OF REVERSION I LOVE WIKLEPDAI —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.230.51.152 (talk • contribs)

GULLLLLL
sorry i need a subject matter headline, i needed ot check my other message and did not know how so i made a new banr and titled it gull so i coul get in and see if jail is in the near future for me, im sorry ichiro, my english lacking abilities make jail the near future for mahkj! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.230.51.152 (talk • contribs)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.