User talk:Yameka

Welcome
 Hello Yameka, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
 * Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Yameka, good luck, and have fun. --Aboutmovies (talk) 05:48, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The last mr. bigg


The article The last mr. bigg has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 02:55, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

http://blog.al.com/live/2010/02/shot_in_the_head_the_last_mr_b.html

February 2013
Hello, I'm BigDwiki. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to this edit to Nadillac, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, BigDwiki (talk) 04:20, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The last mr. bigg


A tag has been placed on The last mr. bigg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Tgeairn (talk) 04:25, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tgeairn (talk) 04:29, 24 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi, I'm Qwyrxian, an admin here at Wikipedia. I did read your comments on that articles talk page, but still deleted the article. None of those "sources" you provided did anything other than verify that Mr. Bigg once existed and released an album. That, in and of itself, is not sufficient to have a Wikipedia album. Please see WP:BAND, which lists the notability guidelines for musicians. If you think he meets those, please explain here and I'll see if I can help recreate the article. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:25, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Tgeairn (talk) 05:23, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:48, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Mr. Bigg email
Yameka, I got your email, but you didn't answer the question I posed to you in response to your comment on my user page: what criteria on WP:BAND does this person meet? If he does not meet our notability requirements, he cannot have a Wikipedia page. Qwyrxian (talk) 15:22, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Yameka, please reply here, on Wikipedia, not by email. Your responses don't help. Appearing on another person's song is not appearing on a major media work0--that's means the song appeared in a movie or television show. In any event, the "Poppin' My Collar" point is useless because, as the article used to say, he isn't credited on that song. And even if you could find proof that part of his work was sampled for that song, being sampled on a song that had radio play (which you'd also need to verify with reliable sources) wouldn't be enough. I'm sorry, but this person just doesn't seem notable enough for a Wikipedia article. If you can at least verify that he was sampled on that song, we could re-add the info to the Poppin article and then leave a redirect from Mr. Bigg to that song. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:28, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Ok, First off "Mr. Bigg" / "The Last Mr. Bigg" "only if you knew" his debut album was number 9 on billboard on april 27th 2002 and reached Number 7 on may 4th in and steadily stayed at Number 7 three more weeks in 2002 on Billboard - http://www.billboard.com/artist/311876/mr-bigg The part saying he wasn't credited on the song was wrong even then and wrong now it's simply not true...He is in the Video also, I assumed He was originally part of the Group in which That is something I can't prove but everything else i can...but here even on the Album version Poppin my Collar - You see Mr. Bigg Publishing (BMI) and D. Pears as a writer http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?release=2982953Yameka (talk) 01:09, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Mr. Bigg for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mr. Bigg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mr. Bigg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:20, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nat (rapper), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:35, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

References - ok here are some sources - http://ew.newsblaze.com/story/2006031613010100001.ew/topstory.htmlYameka (talk) 14:24, 26 February 2013 (UTC) Sources http://24hourhiphop.com/next-in-line/natalac-to-build-an-empire/Yameka (talk) 14:24, 26 February 2013 (UTC) http://jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/100402/ent_10599124.shtmlYameka (talk) http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http://www.geocities.com/ultimatereview/natreview.html&date=2009-10-25+23:30:12Yameka (talk) 14:24, 26 February 2013 (UTC) http://www.broadjam.com/artists/albums.php?artistID=75800&mediaID=21685Yameka (talk) 14:24, 26 February 2013 (UTC) http://www.cduniverse.com/productinfo.asp?pid=8107938Yameka (talk) 14:24, 26 February 2013 (UTC) Natalac recently bought and started a truck company in addition to owning a record company http://transportation-services.findthedata.org/l/1549498/Natalac-ExpressYameka (talk) 14:24, 26 February 2013 (UTC) http://www.prlog.org/11348905-natalac-the-most-infamous-pimp-in-the-south-signs-pgeezy-tug-to-natalac-records.htmlYameka (talk) 14:24, 26 February 2013 (UTC) Stealin from a deadman off his Bare truth album with a tupac shukur interview http://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/video.php?v=wshhSZq5B6Cucmtl6ns3Yameka (talk) 14:24, 26 February 2013 (UTC) Pimp of the city featured on BET Uncut - http://coast2coastmixtapes.com/videodetail.aspx/natalac-pimp-of-the-city-b-e-t-uncut-classic-with-explicit-versionYameka (talk) 14:24, 26 February 2013 (UTC) Mixtape with wyclef vol. 183 http://coast2coastmixtapes.com/mixtapes/mixtapedetail.aspx/coast-2-coast-mixtape-vol-183-hosted-by-wyclef-jeanYameka (talk) 14:24, 26 February 2013 (UTC) Mixtape hosted by kendrick lamar - http://www.datpiff.com/Kendrick-Lamar-Coast-2-Coast-224-mixtape.432017.htmlYameka (talk) 14:24, 26 February 2013 (UTC) mixtape hosted by yo gotti natalac also featured on this also number 13 entitled STAAACKS- http://www.memphisrap.com/2013/01/05/rapper-yo-gotti-hosts-new-coast-2-coast-mixtape-vol-225-ft-2-chainz-others/Yameka (talk) 19:26, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, well, in order to remove the tag, the references need to be added to the article to verify specific claims in the article. But before you start doing that you have to read WP:RS. The vast majority, if not all, of the above links do not meet our guidelines for reliable sources. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:07, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Well since you have more the experience than i and i don't wanna delete the tag unworthy then be penalized could you use the ones YOU Accept as Worthy? the mixtapes links are for the mixtapes on the natalac page, the link for the 18 wheeler truck company is for the Natalac Express company out of Columbia South Carolina that natalac owns as well, The album BARE TRUTH withe Single Stealing From a Deadman with Tupac is a Worldstar Hip Hop link for the Top Artists in AmericaYameka (talk) 00:32, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I have no interest in doing so. I have hundreds of things I could be doing on Wikipedia, and sorting through dozens of unreliable sites to find a nugget of information on a topic that isn't at all interesting or important to me is not how I want to spend my time here. And, in any event, if you want to edit at Wikipedia, you need to learn how our sourcing rules work. However, one thing that does interest me on Wikipedia is helping new users get better. So why don't you go read WP:RS, then come back and tell me which ones you think meet WP:RS. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:05, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Let me get this strait YOU flagged The Page it saying it doesn't have reliable sources, so then i find articles and post some then you say some are note worthy and some are not, But you wont even delete the ones YOU saw are not RELIABLE enough, to leave the ones that are, but you'll be Right there to flag it again with unreliable sources?Yameka (talk) 01:52, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Pgeezy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pgeezy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pgeezy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CNMall41 (talk) 03:11, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Carolina Anthem


A tag has been placed on Carolina Anthem requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gbawden (talk) 07:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Ok, Gbawden This is just one example of the Carolina Anthem by Mark B. Carolina Anthem has been the Carolina Panthers Anthem for the Football Team that they have Practiced to for motivation since 2013 Example Link of Josh Norman working out to Carolina Anthem by Mark B - https://www.instagram.com/p/1J84zVHImb/ Yameka (talk) 19:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carolina Anthem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Josh Norman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Mark B Marcus Byrd for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark B Marcus Byrd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mark B Marcus Byrd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 09:13, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Carolina Anthem


A tag has been placed on Carolina Anthem requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 12:46, 9 October 2018 (UTC)