User talk:Yamh91~enwiki

Hello, Yamh91, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Happy editing! JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 05:16, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Sourcing
Please note that allieiswired.com is a fan-site, and cannot be used as a source for information within any Wikipedia articles. Thank you.&mdash;Kww(talk) 12:30, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Backflipsong.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Backflipsong.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:03, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Removing AFD notices
Do not ever remove AFD notices from articles. The notice will be removed when the discussion is closed. If you want to express an opinion on whether the article should be deleted, click the link inside the AFD notice. If you remove the notice again, that removal will be treated as vandalism.&mdash;Kww(talk) 19:41, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. You have been previously warned. Do not remove AFD notices from articles.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:02, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. &mdash;Kww(talk) 01:45, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. You must not remove AFD notices from articles. Your use of the anonymous IP 189.237.105.162 has not gone undetected, either. Further vandalism using the anonymous IP will have consequences.&mdash;Kww(talk) 23:27, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


 * It would also be best if you didn't log out to remove AfD notices, or to leave harassing messages for other users. Last time I saw significant activity on this front was in March, so I'm hesitant to take administrative action on your recent activity, there, but it's very easy to get into trouble doing this, and you should probably know that. – Luna Santin  (talk) 20:20, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

ANI
Your constant edit-warring and false vandalism accusations are being discussed at ANI.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:07, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Here's to New Dreams has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. blurredpeace ☮ 22:07, 11 May 2009 (UTC)


 * FYI, your behavior has been reported as vandalism. Please do not remove any deletion or other administrative notices from articles.  You'll likely be blocked for a much longer time.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:18, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Anti-Love Song
I moved your information from the talk page to the main article. It looks shorter now, but I kept everything. The main reason it is shorter is because phrases like "from Raven-Symone's fourth album, Raven-Symone" just become "from the album".

This is the right way to handle singles that never charted. They don't get an individual article, but there's nothing at all wrong with putting the infobox and description in the album article.

We haven't been working well together, but I'd like to try and change that. I can see that you are an editor that wants to do things right. Unfortunately, part of doing things right is to not create articles that fail guidelines. The guidelines for article creation on singles are at WP:NSONGS, which I kept pointing at every time I redirected one of these articles or nominated it for deletion. Following guidelines is important, and, if you do so, we should get along much better.&mdash;Kww(talk) 17:34, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism accusations
You really need to avoid making all these accusations of vandalism. In this edit, you accused an admin of vandalism. That can cause you problems.&mdash;Kww(talk) 02:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Would you please learn to talk to people instead of just edit war? Why are you adding the Rhythmic Top 40? If you look at Rhythmic Top 40, it states that Rhythmic Top 40 is a component of the Billboard Hot 100, and WP:Record charts says not to include a chart if it's a component chart. Please revert your edit instead of edit warring. Remember: edit warring is a blockable offense, and reverting 4 times in 24 hours is an automatic block: see WP:3RR.&mdash;Kww(talk) 02:31, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Stop accusing me of vandalism. I do not vandalize articles. Never have, never will. I removed those charts because they are component charts, and WP:Record charts says that component charts should not be included in articles. It doesn't matter if they are right or not: they are component charts, and should not be included. Please learn to follow guidelines and policies, and don't just revert every edit that you disagree with. Especially do not edit-war by logging and and making changes under anonymous addresses, as you did here.&mdash;Kww(talk) 23:47, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Stop reverting, and review a few of the guidelines that you insist on violating, please.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:25, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Raven-Symoné discography has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 02:35, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. &mdash;Kww(talk) 23:50, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Bad Charts
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. You must stop adding charts listed on WP:BADCHARTS, such as the Mexico Top 100, the Chilean Single Chart and the Top Latino charts&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:33, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Removal of AfD notice
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. - eo (talk) 17:16, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

enough with reverting, disruption and non-notable articles
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. - eo (talk) 18:27, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Probably your last chance
You really need to understand that you are about to be indefinitely blocked because of your editing. You can't just revert every edit you don't like without explanation. After Thetruth12892 started removing your "Anti-Love Song" section, I looked at your sources more carefully, and discovered that he's right: you haven't got a single reliable source for the material. That's why I started to remove it as well. If you want to restore it, find a reliable source for the material, and add the sources. If you just continually edit-war, your edits will be removed, and you will wind up blocked.&mdash;Kww(talk) 03:49, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * What references? Please show me one reliable reference that meets WP:RS: Moldova.org doesn't count. Please respond on a talk page, not in an edit summary: learn to use Wikipedia and discuss edits.&mdash;Kww(talk) 04:07, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * There is only one reference that describes it as a single. Your Billboard reference lists it only as a track on an album. I also note that you did exactly what I asked you not to do: you communicated only via an edit summary. You can't do that. You need to use talk pages, and discuss your edits. Simply reverting every other editors contributions to Raven-Symone articles is unacceptable behaviour.&mdash;Kww(talk) 05:04, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - eo (talk) 11:02, 22 June 2009 (UTC)


 * [Do you think we are stupid]?&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:22, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. - eo (talk) 10:04, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigations/Yamh91
Due to your continued disruption and block evasion, I have indefinitely blocked your account. As always, if you wish to contest the block, you're welcome to add with a reason for an unblock. Icestorm815 •  Talk  14:25, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Yamh91. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Yamh91~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 03:29, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)