User talk:YanA

Please, PLEASE, stop making SO MANY minor edits to such an often-edited page as the Village pump and causing edit conflicts... it's amazingly irritating.

If you want to experiment with the way your signature looks, go do it in the Sandbox, I beg of you. :) --Dante Alighieri | Talk 17:49, Apr 22, 2004 (UTC)

Message deleted a long time ago
''This message was deleted during an experiment from my earlier days on wikipedia. However, I feel bad about having deleted another user's comment. So, here it is, once again allowed to exist on my talk page.''--YanA 08:32, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Howdy, welcome to Wikiepdia. I see you've already started on HMS Serapis (it's nice to see a new user who's so comfortable with wikimarkup so early - did you contribute anonymously first?). Anyway, incase you didn't find them already, here's some handy "getting started" links:


 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Also, you probably want to take a look at WikiProject Ships, which is the "standard" (such as it is) for ship articles, and which will hook you up with other shipping fans (or lonely sad weirdos as the rest of us call them). TTFN. -- Finlay McWalter 02:07, 26 Jan 2004 (UTC)

I see that the Flamborough Head article refers to a (currently non-existent) Battle of Flamborough Head, which I assume to be the same thing as you're talking about in HMS Serapis. I figure we should either make the battle page a Redirect to Serapis, or move the battley parts to the battle page from Serapis, with links from there back to both Flamborough Head and HMS Serapis. What do you think? -- Finlay McWalter 03:19, 26 Jan 2004 (UTC)

...and if you want to get credit (or take blame) for the edits you did as an anon, you can do so at the Changing attribution for an edit page. -- Finlay McWalter 03:22, 26 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Battleships
Hi: I am currently writing a series of articles about Victorian battleships, and have arrived at the Devastation class. Would you mind if I re-worked your work? I know I don't have to ask, but I like to.--Anthony.bradbury 19:53, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:CFT-Low_Spin.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CFT-Low_Spin.JPG, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU ≈ talk 00:25, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:CFT_-_High_Spin.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CFT_-_High_Spin.JPG, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 20:07, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Burrowing Owl Featured Picture Nomination
Thank you very much. I have four versions that I am looking at and have asked a friend to help me perhaps edit one that is a little lighter and reduce the shadowing as well as enhance the contrast a bit. He was a willing subject, shot at an indoor aviary, so he was used to have his/her picture taken. Much appreciated!--MONGO 21:12, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

I uploaded another image which has some adjustments if you want to choose. The second one is sort of a temporary one just uploaded to Wikipedia, not commons. Thanks again!--MONGO 04:54, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Chemiluminescence - Spring 2006.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Chemiluminescence - Spring 2006.JPG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. YanA 06:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Wikipedia Fail!!!.svg
Thank you for uploading File:Wikipedia Fail!!!.svg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 02:52, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Hydroamination-2.svg
Thank you for uploading File:Hydroamination-2.svg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 02:52, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed Image Deletion
A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:10, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia Fail!!!.svg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wikipedia Fail!!!.svg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 23:01, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Crystal Field Splitting 2.PNG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Crystal Field Splitting 2.PNG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:39, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Earth–Minbari War


The article Earth–Minbari War has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 12:31, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Earth–Minbari War for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Earth–Minbari War is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Earth–Minbari War until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – sgeureka t•c 20:40, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Omega-class destroyer


The article Omega-class destroyer has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication this fictional starship class passes WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to show anything that is not a plot summary. Some discussion of origin and design, but mostly sourced to blogs/listervs/etc."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:02, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Omega-class destroyer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Omega-class destroyer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Omega-class destroyer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:09, 25 November 2019 (UTC)