User talk:Yanivhaber

Speedy deletion of Yang@Tiroche Gallery
A tag has been placed on Yang@Tiroche Gallery, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:33, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:35, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Explanation request
Hi Dan, It was never my intention to do advertising on the article I posted today - Yang@Tiroche Gallery - but instead just add informative description regarding a new gallery house. I have seen many such articles about companies and the services they provide, with similar content and I do not understand exactly why this one was deleted so brutally (see example in Yigal_Arnon_%26_Co.). Can you please explain the difference?

I then accidentally removed the spam tag due to improper understanding of the procedure. But while doing it I also removed all the 'advertising jargon'. Was the second version not OK as well? Can I try and post the amended article again with some references? Thanks, Yaniv


 * Hi Yaniv, I am not Dan, but I noticed your question and would like to help. I am sorry that you first contact with wikipedia has been so unpleasent, I hope that your future interaction will be better.


 * Let me try to explain to you what happened. You created an article on a subject which you seem to have a conflict of interest.  In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest are strongly discouraged.  Even after you cleaned it up, there was still a concern that that the gallery is not notable (which for Wikipedia generally means having significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject) and was only there because the subject of the article wanted it there (ie spam). In the past wikipedia has had problems with commercial enterprises trying to use wikipedia for its own benefit and the community has reacted strongly to counter bias.  Your main mistake was not in removing the tag, or in cleaning it up, but in creating it in the first place.


 * I would strong recommend that you follow the directions laid out in our frequently asked questions for businesses if you wish to try again to create the article. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page. Jon513 (talk) 21:09, 10 November 2008 (UTC)