User talk:Yank2000

May 2018
Hello, I'm EricEnfermero. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. EricEnfermero (Talk) 04:48, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Neutral point of view
Thank you for your message. If a neutral point of view is something that can be backed up by factual data and information then the data exists in both television broadcasts, pitchFx data on mlb.com and umpire review reports. I hope this clarifies the wiki edit I made. Thank you again. Yank2000 (talk) 14:53, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * PitchFx data doesn’t - in any way imaginable - describe what an umpire is best known for. Even looking at the descriptions of games from reliable sources like newspaper accounts, something like “best known for” is still going to be subjective, making that kind of edit a truly terrible idea. There is just no way that an edit like that will ever be justifiable. EricEnfermero (Talk) 15:10, 11 May 2018 (UTC)