User talk:YankeeDoodle14

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you haven't done so already, you may want to create an account.

Please read The Five Pillars of Wikipedia to help you get to know this place, and you might want to look at What Wikipedia is not to see what is and isn't suitable for Wikipedia.

And remember, don't submit copyrighted work without permission. By submitting your work you promise you wrote it yourself, or copied it from public domain resources — this does not include most web pages.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk pages using four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) to produce your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! Dan100 (Talk) 21:30, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Declaration of Independence
What is the basis of your edits about the Declaration of Independence and Josiah Bartlett? The Declaration was not ratified on July 2nd (the Lee Resolution was). And it was not signed on the 4th. It was adopted on the 4th, and then a handwritten copy was created later which was signed by the delegates. --JW1805 (Talk) 22:57, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

You are mistaken. According to World Book (2001 CD version):
 * "On July 2, the Congress approved the Lee resolution. The delegates then began to debate Jefferson's draft.  A few passages, including one condemning King George for encouraging the slave trade, were removed.  Most other changes dealt with style.  On July 4, the Congress adopted the final draft of the Declaration of Independence.  
 * The Declaration was signed by John Hancock as president of the Second Continental Congress and by Charles Thomson, the Congress's secretary. It was promptly printed and read to a large crowd in the State House yard on July 8.  On July 19, the Congress ordered the Declaration to be engrossed (written in stylish script) on parchment.  It also ordered that all its members sign the engrossed copy.  Eventually, 56 members signed.  "

--JW1805 (Talk)
 * Adams was talking about the Lee Resolution which said "Resolved, That these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States..." This is different from the Declaration of Independence which was a longer document written by Jefferson. --JW1805 (Talk) 03:43, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Fool (The Fallen Angel)
Hi I've just marked this page for proposed deletion as it isn't cited and I cannot find any mention of him/her in the new testament. If you can cite the source you got this from please go there and remove the prod. Regards -- Shimirel (Talk) 19:32, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Do you wish to remove the prop then? if your sure it is out their ill leave it alone perhaps if you said on the page that its an obscure footnote in an English translation of the Catholic New Testament? Given what you have said I wouldn't put it up for deletion again if you did decide to remove it. Regards -- Shimirel (Talk) 22:38, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

I put it up for deletion, as unverified, and as far as I can tell, unverifiable. Please see Articles for deletion/Fool (The Fallen Angel). If you can't say more than there being an obscure footnote that you can't find again, that's not enough. -GTBacchus(talk) 20:22, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

COTW Project
You voted for Caribbean Sea, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. -Scottwiki 03:38, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from articles without explanation.
Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to NCIS (TV series). It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Oni Ookami AlfadorTalk 03:25, 17 May 2006 (UTC) My apologies. You did not remove content. However, you did inapropriately move Agent Gibbs' listing to a section in which it most certainly does not belong.-- Oni Ookami AlfadorTalk 03:37, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't see my mistake in editing the article. Agent Gibbs left the show in the season finale after all.

YankeeDoodle14 ''(Migrated from User talk:Oni Ookami Alfador)
 * This has happened before to a point. My actions were definitely overzealous, but at the same time, he should probably be left for now as he has left NCIS but has not officially left the show.  Technically he is still current as he is in the most recent episodes.  Until it is clearer that he is not going to return in the next season it would be best to simple make note in his description, but to leave him in the current section.-- Oni Ookami AlfadorTalk 02:53, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

List of Roman legions
Would you kindly explain your edits to List of Roman legions?--Panairjdde 20:54, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Legio X
I moved Legio X article to Legio X Fretensis. For now Legio X is a redirect to the latter article, as result of the move. Add the informations about Caesar's legion to Tenth Legion.--Panairjdde 17:04, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * What are the proofs Dando-Collis uses to support that Legio X Fretensis did originate from Legio X, while Legio X Gemina was not?--Panairjdde 21:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * First of all, thank you for accepting the compromise, and then going against it. Then, what are you disputing about Legio X Fretensis??? Answer here or on the Legio talk page.--Panairjdde 22:08, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Whoops, dorry, clicked on the wrong link. Meant to put it on the Gemina page. Sorry. Now, why have you gone against our comprimise and ignored the deal to have seperate the three legions known as the Tenth? --YankeeDoodle14 01:46, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Are you serious? Who wrote Legio X page? There is a clear reference to three legions there.--Panairjdde 09:30, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Well, what about those articles? If you are going to ignore them, remove the disputed tags. If not, solve the problem.--Panairjdde 13:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Please help on William Shakespeare
Posted by PruneauT 01:09, 20 June 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the AID maintenance team.

PIano Man
Thanks...that slipped my mind jj 22:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Yep, anytime. --YankeeDoodle14 05:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Edward Baker Lincoln
Hi! An article you started is up for deletion: Articles_for_deletion/Edward_Baker_Lincoln Thought you might want to vote. Jokestress 17:00, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

COTW Project
You voted for 1950s, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. Davodd 19:55, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

You helped choose this week's WP:AID winner
Draicone (talk) 11:59, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

You helped choose as this week's WP:AID winner
Davodd 17:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Billy Joel DYK
Just a reminder that the article needs to be a fully-fledged one when nominated. One sentence doesn't tend to cut it with the admins (who are surprisingly picky sometimes, I find). BigHaz - Schreit mich an 21:21, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, thatnks. --YankeeDoodle14 21:39, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

You helped choose Mark Twain as this week's WP:AID winner
→ A z a  Toth 00:22, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

City Walk
How's the split coming? -- Farquaadhnchmn ( Dungeon ) 20:25, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * That's okay. I saw you mention you were going to split it up like the two parks, but haven't seen a change yet. If you need help, just let me know.-- Farquaadhnchmn ( Dungeon ) 21:22, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Dando-Collins
Welcome back.

First, D-C is a novelist, and this should be clearly stated in the article, otherwise the reader has no way to weight his claims. Second, you said he discovered new things about this legion, among which its lineage, but you are stil failing to provide references for them.

--Panarjedde 03:24, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

GWB
The last thing that article needs is more vandalism, even meant as a joke. Kaisershatner 22:01, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

The Star-Spangled Banner
Thanks for your catch of my goof on The Star-Spangled Banner. I normally check the history when I revert vandalism so as not leave earlier vandal edits in place. I'm not quite sure quite what went wrong there. Flowerpotman 23:48, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Cultural depictions of Elvis Presley
An article that you created, Cultural depictions of Elvis Presley, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Cultural depictions of Elvis Presley Thank you. SkierRMH 08:43, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

April 2007
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Cappuccio on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. &mdash;dgies tc 22:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Sandbox. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Lakers 22:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to George Washington (inventor), you will be blocked from editing. Lakers 22:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Elvis Presley
Hello. I see you've edited the Cultural depictions of Elvis Presley and I cordially invite you to help us out at the Elvis Presley article with any input, observations, or other help you can provide. --Northmeister 05:52, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Abraham Lincoln assassination GA Sweeps Review: On Hold
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I have reviewed Abraham Lincoln assassination and believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I'm specifically going over all of the "World History-Americas" articles. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, and I'll leave the article on hold for seven days for them to be fixed. I have left this message on your talk page since you have significantly edited the article. Please consider helping address the several points that I listed on the talk page of the article, which shouldn't take too long to fix. I have also left messages on the talk pages for other editors and a few related WikiProjects to spread the workload around some. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 21:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Category:Liberal democracies has been nominated for discussion
Category:Liberal democracies, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:24, 6 January 2018 (UTC)