User talk:Yanniel908

Nawaz Sharif is a Kashmiri
Nawaz Sharif is a Kashmiri, it is verified with sources, its a FACT. If you have a problem with him being mentioned as a Punjabi on any page, then remove him from that page, it does not mean you will delete his name from the Kashmiris page. WP works on FACTS, not POVs. The onus of removing his name from Punjabi page is on you, not me, I am concerned about Kashmiris page. Thanks. Barthateslisa (talk) 04:16, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * This is not a POV, i know Nawaz Sharif is of Kashmiri origin but you don't seem to get my point. Is he still considered a Kashmiri? As strongly as you may feel that he should be in Kashmiris Pgae, there are editors on the Punjabi Muslims page who see him as a Punjabi and have placed him there plus that is how people generally view him.His picture was removed a few times from Punjabi muslims page but it has been added back. Nehru on the other the other hand is never viewed from any other group other than a Kashmiri. RegardsYanniel908 (talk) 09:26, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, there are probably a few million people in Punjab (Pakistan) today that have Kashmiri roots. But they are not considered as ethnic Kashmiris or do you say that all people in Punjab that have Kashmiri roots are the same Kashmiris that live in Srinagar? I don't think that is right. Kashmiris in Punjab over centuries have lost their Kashmiri identity and can not be classified as Kashmiris on a Page that coveres ethnic Kashmiris, though it is worth mentioning about them in the article which has been done in the Migration section. Yanniel908 (talk) 10:37, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Unsourced content
Hi, re: making unsourced changes to unsourced content is not an improvement to the article, it's disruptive. Though you may have very insightful observations about the subject matter, we're not interested in your opinions or original research. The status quo will be preserved until you can provide adequate sourcing. Note also two very important things: Anything related to India and Pakistan is subject to discretionary sanctions. In a nutshell this means that the Wikipedia community is not interested in dealing with the perpetual disputes that arise from caste/ethnicity/borders/religious distribution/language distribution/etc. in articles related to India and Pakistan, and administrators such as myself may quickly issue editing sanctions at the first sight of a dispute. So, I ask you to please provide adequate sourcing, as anything short of that will be considered disruptive. And even when editing any other article at Wikipedia, when someone reverts you, it is your responsibility to open a discussion on the article's talk page, not resubmit the problematic content. See WP:BRD. Thank you, and please understand that it's nothing personal. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:38, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi there, it would be good if you actually go through the articles on those two tribes. Those are non-pashtuns. Those editors who have put Tanolis as "maybe Pashtun" is based in nothing substantial, they have based it on unreliable source; a source which is not accepted among scholarly circles and basically the tribe have never been classified as Pashtun by any authority on the subject. As with regards to Gujars, it is not even a matter of debate, the article is sufficient proof in itself. Anyways i leave it at that. Thanks.Yanniel908 (talk) 17:37, 4 November 2015 (UTC)