User talk:Yannip-berlin

Speedy deletion nomination of BarebackCITY
Hello Yannip-berlin,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged BarebackCITY for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 07:30, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Why, what is the problem with the page???
 * Hello and thank you for your contribution. But Wikipedia is encyclopedia and not Social Network or advertising platform. In order to get included, article has to have significant coverage in independent and verifiable sources. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 07:39, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Ok, i understand this and what is it? https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlanetRomeo  ??? For some pages no problem, for other is a problem?
 * Try to search PlanetRomeo or Grindr in Google. You will see hundreds of independent and verifiable sources. The site you mentioned in the articles does not have. So, again, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not advertising platform. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 07:45, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Yes of course, the PlanetRomeo is the website since 2002, barebackCITY sins few months! For Rich websites no problem, right? for me this is discrimination!!!! If you want money for this let me know, i thing PlanetRomeo and Grindr pay you for this! if my page be deleted'll see you in court for discrimination
 * What in statement Wikipedia is not advertising platform did you not understand? Please, read Notability and Too soon to see why your article can't be included. Wikipedia is not commercial platform. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:03, 18 January 2016 (UTC

OK, if is not, delete the PlanetRomeo and Grindr anf etc. pages!!!!! Or the money witch the PlanetRomeo nad Grindr pa you is a lot and you cant delete?!?

January 2016
Hello, I'm Arthistorian1977. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:49, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Delete other pages too, other is Commersial too!!!!!!

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:07, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

So, if you don't get your way, you will vandalize Wikipedia? Jim1138 (talk) 09:11, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

why approve other webpages my not?????? you can block me or delete my account and i can create new! approve my page or delete other too!!!

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:16, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User:Arthistorian1977. Jim1138 (talk) 09:22, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

You are just a vandal. Agree? Jim1138 (talk) 09:26, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Other commercial pages
Please list these other commercial pages which you think should be deleted. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:30, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCRUFF_(app) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grindr https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlanetRomeo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaydar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tinder_(app) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 09:47, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

I presume you are wanting to write an article about a gay-related app on Wikipedia? Does the app achieve wp:notability? Can you write the article in a sandbox such as user:Yannip-berlin? Doing so is usually the best way to start an article. Another option would be a draft. See Your first article. Doing so with a sandbox or draft would generally avoid much of this turmoil. You would still need to get it over the wp:notability hurdle. Also would need to avoid the appearance of being promotional. It would have to read like an encyclopedia article. Cheers


 * SCRUFF (app) This seems to be the most encyclopedic of the lot.
 * Grindr Fairly encyclopedic. There is quite a bit of controversy listed - if it was overtly promotional, I would think this would have been removed.
 * PlanetRomeo Does appear rather promotional and could use some trimming.
 * Gaydar This talks about being intuitively able to identify someone as gay. There is a short paragraph about a "gaydar" electronic device.

Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:57, 18 January 2016 (UTC)