User talk:Yanqin Li/Monguor language

Peer Review
Hello, I have a couple of suggestions for your Article. First, you need to add much more information and sub-topics because this information is way too little. More explanation is needed under phenology and numerals. We don't know enough about your language tell us more details. Overall the sources are good but the article is too short and basic. Also, the last sentence in the first paragraph is not written well, maybe try to focus and on the structure a little more. Suby1234 (talk) 01:36, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Final Review
Hi Yanqin, this is my feedback for your final project. As a reminder, the 6 points on which I'm grading you are Language, Structure, Balance, Accuracy, Relevance, and Length. Here are my assessments on each of those areas:


 * 1) Language: On the whole, the article employs proper English spelling and grammar. 5 points.
 * 2) Structure: The article has a lead and two short sections. 3 points.
 * 3) Balance: At present, the article appears to reflect a neutral point of view. 5 points.
 * 4) Accuracy: Nearly all of the claims are backed by references to the scholarly literature. 5 points.
 * 5) Relevance: Nearly all of the information is relevant to the subject. 5 points.
 * 6) Length: Word count 541/2000 (including headers but not bibliography). 1 point.

The final score is 24/30. Have a great summer! Chuck Haberl (talk) 21:31, 12 May 2021 (UTC)