User talk:Yappofloyd

Disambiguation link notification for June 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * MRT Brown Line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Nonthaburi


 * MRT Yellow Line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Samrong

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Edit in BTS Skytrain Article
Hello, I have one concern about your revertion at BTS Skytrain article. The train shown in the picture is the CNR (Changchun Train) but the description says only "BTS Skytrain". Looking forward to hear from you. (P.S. I'm Thai, you can message me in Thai if you want)

 romtam  talk 08:08, 29 July 2014 (UTC) Hello Khun romtam,

Firstly, please note that though I have been updating this page and the sections, I did not post the original pic nor description. I reverted that for two reasons; 1) BTS Skytrain seems an appropriate description in the general section regardless of the specific rolling stock. I'm not sure why it would be important to state that this is CNR (EMU B) in the pic which is in the general section? The pic below states "interior of a train" but not which rolling stock interior. Is it really necessary?

2) As you can see, I have greatly expanded the rolling stock section including delivery dates. In that section there are two pics of both the Siemens and CNR rolling stock - though the later does not state if it is Mark 1 or Mark II as the two batches that have been delivered are different.

I'm not set either way. It just seems to flow better that the specific rolling stock descriptions are in that section. If you feel strongly about it then change it again but perhaps also for the interior pic.

Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.183.245.178 (talk) 15:15, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply.  romtam  talk 04:59, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MRT Brown Line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nonthaburi ([//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/MRT_Brown_Line check to confirm] | [//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/MRT_Brown_Line?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Springfield railway line
I am mystified why you reverted my edit. There are two citations to the same PDF file so I added a citation re-use for one of them. In what way are they different? Kerry (talk) 23:27, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

I am completely confused as to why you think that the 2011 Connecting SEQ comprehensive report consisting of 148 pages is the same as an early 2019 16 page City of Ipswich overview of the corridor??? Yappofloyd (talk) 23:42, 8 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Because you added a second citation with the same URL, specifically http://www.ppt.asn.au/pubdocs/connecting_seq2031+%281%29.pdf

From

.

The lines are shown in the map below.

See, they are the same URL. Kerry (talk) 00:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Ah yes, I obviously wasn't aware that I didn't paste the correct report link. I've now rectified that. Given that the edit specifically referred to a 2019 report along with the title it may have been better to just search for the correct url or notify/query me as the edit obviously wasn't referring to the 2011 SEQ report. Cheers Yappofloyd (talk) 12:07, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mass Rapid Transit Master Plan in Bangkok Metropolitan Region, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metro. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Pink Line
NotCory (talk) 07:32, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Regarding Nopparat opening date
According to a TransportDailynews post, which Suraphong had interviewed with: "[...]other phases include the Yellow Line phase 2: Lat Phrao (YL01), and Pink Line phase 2: Royal Irrigation Department (PK05) - Chaeng Wattana 14 (PK11) and Nopparat, and phase 3 [Samakkhi (PK04)] - Nonthaburi Civic Center (PK01) will open in 2022." However, I'd say that it shouldn't be included for now since it's the only source that mentions the exact opening of Nopparat, even though it's coming from the company's chairman.

Regarding formatting
As for formatting concerns, the dates should be grouped along with the phases instead of grouping them with stations list. "Note:" is also unnecessary because the bracket should makes it clear that it's an addition to the earlier text.

Unexplained revert
Hi Yappofloyd

In this edit, you reverted an edit by me. However, you did not provide an edit summary to explain why you had reverted. Per WP:REVEXP, edit summaries are always a good practice, and they are particularly important when reverting.

My edit, which merged several duplicate sources and tagged inappropriate sources. That was a useful improvement, so I have run my script again.  Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 13:19, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi BrownHairGirl, indeed I nearly always provide an edit summary. In this case, I didn't as it is the 3rd time I have removed the tag for MRTA Orange line construction updates. The official FB pages clearly meet WP:SELFSOURCE. How are these an inappropriate sources as you state? All the MRT metro projects maintain official FB pages for monthly construction progress updates by the MRTA. There can be no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity & the actual updates in this case are limited to factual progress percentages. The script doesn't seem to distinguish between official, statutory authority, FB pages and non official ones. You've only been runnning the script on these pages in the last few months for some reason. The script has also inserted the tag on other MRT articles - MRT Yellow line & MRT Pink line - which I have also previously removed.

I'll note that once the line opens for operation, most of these construction updates refs will be removed as they will no longer be as relevant. Only a few will be kept for historical overview. This was the case with the MRT Blue and MRT Purple line articles. Accordingly, rather than use the format for what are temporary refs, it has been easier to just ref the url. However, if you are going to keep running the script then I will probably change this practice. --Yappofloyd (talk) 10:52, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)