User talk:Yarnalgo

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6

Thank you Yarnalgo!
I created the page "List of rovers on extraterrestrial bodies". It is the first article i have ever created in Wikipedia. I reviewed the page on 19th January, 2020 and saw your edits. I am glad to see that your edit has improved the article quite a bit.

So thank you for your contribution — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanvir Ahmed Zubair (talk • contribs) 15:43, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you too!!!

Thanks for your prompt and trouble-free gentrification of my correction of the small technical error in the Arrokoth article - looks spiffy!! :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.197.221.141 (talk) 16:00, 15 February 2020 (UTC)


 * No problem! -- Yarnalgo  talk 17:24, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Bridgeport Barrage.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Bridgeport Barrage.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Cancel it
No need Abdullah Al Manjur (talk) 14:22, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Don’t talk at the discussion sorry ok Abdullah Al Manjur (talk) 14:22, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 101955 Bennu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aetos ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/101955_Bennu check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/101955_Bennu?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Starlink
What do you think of Paul Benedict's latest edit? Cordially. CRS-20 (talk) 00:38, 20 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Seems fine to me. Do you think it doesn't belong in the intro? -- Yarnalgo talk 17:20, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, it should be in 2018-2019, in my opinion. CRS-20 (talk) 19:48, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Roscosmos vs. RKA
Hi, thanks for your edits on Roscosmos and RKA. The fact is that RKA is one of the precursors to Roscosmos (it existed from 1992 to 1999). Roscosmos (full name: Federal Space Agency) was established in 2004. They explain it here, in the first paragraph: https://www.roscosmos.ru/9156/ Also, Roscosmos is an acronym, and RKA is an abbreviation, not the other way around. Best regards. Buxareu (talk) 09:27, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for the explanation, but this is not explained anywhere in the Roscosmos article. The RKA acronym (I think you might have acronym and abbreviation mixed up?) just started getting used halfway through the article with no explanation, which is why I added the clarify tag. Thank you for adding the correct Russian name so that "RKA" is explained, but this history that you're giving me about it being the precursor is still unexplained. In that Current programs section, the writing just switches to calling it the Russian Space Agency/RKA without any explanation that that is a former name/precursor organization, which was pretty confusing for me when reading through. Could you add the information that you just gave me, with that source, to the article? It seems like this is probably important enough to add to the lead with the Russian Space Agency name bolded since it redirects to this article. Thanks! -- Yarnalgo talk 19:27, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Also, I just noticed that the Crisis years section talks about what "Roscosmos" was doing in the 1990s, and the next section talks about "Roscosmos" cosmonauts flying to the ISS in 2000, which contradicts what you just told me about Roscosmos being established in 2004 (not saying you're wrong, just that the article is confusing as it's written). Can you make this more clear in the article? I would make these changes myself, but clearly you are more knowledgeable on this topic, and I could use your help. Thanks! -- Yarnalgo talk 19:32, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, the Roscosmos article should definitely be rewritten, including the second paragraph where they mention one of the precursors to Roscosmos: first, the year given, 1992, is blatantly wrong (correct year: 2004), and secondly, Roscosmos had several precursors. Will try to fix it when I have time. As to acronyms: RKA is pronounced letter by letter (at least in Russian: "er-kah-ah"), so it's NOT an acronym, while Roscosmos is pronounced as a word, which means it's an acronym. "Roscosmos" is formed of the first three letters of the word "Rossiysky" (Russian) and the word "kosmos" (space). It literally means "Russian space". P.S. As a matter of fact, the current Roscosmos was established in 2015; the previos organization, also called Roscosmos, existed from 2004 to 2015 (yes, this stuff is quite confusing). All this info must be mentioned in the article. Buxareu (talk) 09:48, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Added info on the precursors. Buxareu (talk) 14:14, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Looks great, thank you! And I think I see what you mean now. I've always thought an abbreviation like RKA was called an acronym under the first definition given on Wiktionary ("An abbreviation formed by the initial letters of other words"), but I guess based on the second half of the definition there that it is more of an initialism ("A term formed from the initial letters of several words or parts of words, but which is itself pronounced letter by letter"). And Roscosmos fits under the second given definition of acronym: "An abbreviation formed by the beginning letters or syllables of other words". Abbreviation seems to be the umbrella term that encompasses all of these ("A shortened or contracted form of a word or phrase"). Thanks again for explaining! -- Yarnalgo talk 19:01, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

New Horizons
Hi. Sorry, can't find a printed source, but asked members of the team and been told it's unlikely a third target will be found. There's not even a Hubble search going on, is there? Maybe we could say that. — kwami (talk) 17:54, 12 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but asking members of the team is original research. If you want to claim that it is "unlikely" then you need a published source. I've talked to members of the team too, and their analysis said there was a ~1% chance of finding a new target. That information has never been released publicly though so we can't put it in the article. They are using Subaru for the initial search this time around and then will use Hubble for follow-up observations to confirm any candidates. They are currently analyzing the data collected from Subaru over the last couple months and should know within the next few weeks whether there's any viable candidates or not so maybe some more information will be released publicly soon. -- Yarnalgo talk 21:08, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

That's why I didn't revert you. I thought you might be able to find sources, which it looks like you will be, so I'll leave it in your hands. — kwami (talk) 21:55, 12 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Yeah, unfortunately they just haven't released much publicly yet about the search besides the article that is already cited there. As soon as they do, I'll be sure to update the page. -- Yarnalgo talk 22:51, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Aerojet Rocketdyne logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Aerojet Rocketdyne logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Andrew nyr talk  contribs  05:02, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Canadian Lacrosse Association logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Canadian Lacrosse Association logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Van zyl overlook
I request you to Please come forward and make a page for van zyl overlook. it is a important site in Mars 2020 mission and needed for new Mars 2020 self portrait image. Chinakpradhan (talk) 17:20, 8 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Sorry, don't have the time for that. -- Yarnalgo talk 17:11, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Blast Lacrosse Screen 01.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Blast Lacrosse Screen 01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Blast Lacrosse Screen 02.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Blast Lacrosse Screen 02.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Blast Lacrosse Screen 03.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Blast Lacrosse Screen 03.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Is this robotic arm a permanent iss robotic Arm or just for a short time on ISS
Hi Yarnalgo  sir, can you please help me in this matter. i wrote about GITAI S1 Robotic Arm Tech Demo as a tech demo on this wikipedia page SpaceX CRS-23. Though it is a tech demo, if it will remain aboard ISS, then this mission will be a ISS assembly mission like the CRS 21 and CRS 22.If it is not permanent iss arm, then i will be relieved. but if yes then i have to do lot of changes on these pages on wikipedia. Thus it will be needed to create a new topic for this arm and then it must be added to ISS assembly page and then we have to write about it on all robotic arm page about iss like canadarm2, era, dextre, strela, Mobile Servicing System, etc. this thing seems to me a bit confusing. so please share your views sir. Chinakpradhan (talk) 06:12, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I am not familiar with this tech demo, and I don't have time to do the research myself. If you are not clear on its purpose then I'd advise you not to make any changes yourself until and unless you find reliable sources that make it clear. Otherwise, just let the other editors that know more do their work. You don't need to do anything, especially if you don't understand what something is for yourself. -- Yarnalgo talk 18:27, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Starlink, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:In The Crease
Hello, Yarnalgo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:In The Crease, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:In The Crease


Hello, Yarnalgo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "In The Crease".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:03, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Quebec Caribous for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quebec Caribous is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Quebec Caribous until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Boleyn (talk) 11:06, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
Hello Yarnalgo! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! &mdash; MusikBot II  talk  17:25, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of List of career achievements by Gary Gait for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of career achievements by Gary Gait is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of career achievements by Gary Gait until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Let&#39;srun (talk) 19:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC)