User talk:Yarnalgo/Archive 3

commons:User:Yarnalgo
I assert to be the same user as commons:User:Yarnalgo. --Yarnalgo 19:28, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Death-simpsons.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Death-simpsons.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 14:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Copyright status for Image:Garygait.jpg
Hi, you tagged this image as No rights reserved, but I can find no indication that the copyright holder have released this image under any sort of free license, let alone released all rights to it. Please note that full copyright protection is always the default unless the copyright holder have explicitly stated otherwise or the copyright have lapsed due to age (clearly not the case here). Therefore I have tagged it as having "no license", meaning it will soon be deleted unless you can provide additional information to prove that all rights rely have been released for this image. --Sherool (talk) 22:15, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Professional Lacrosse template
I like the template you made, but I was curious why college leagues (USL MDIA, MCLA, NECLL) are included? They are definitely not professional leagues. Maybe a re-name of the template to "Lacrosse League" or "North American Lacrosse Leagues"? Stoneice02 02:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I just noticed that the actual title bar in the template reads "Lacrosse Leagues" so I guess you've already taken care of that. Stoneice02 02:24, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, I realized after I had created it that I named it wrong. I will move it later, I just don't have the energy to do it right now. --Yarnalgo 03:00, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

List of U.S. state colors
Hi! I just saw your edit there, do you have any source for Utah's State Color? Couldn't find it on the Utah.gov website. Regards, -- Hedwig in Washington (TALK) 23:38, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * No sorry, I did not add that. I was reverting an IP vandalism edit from a while ago that no one picked up (diff). --Yarnalgo 03:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Oops, now as you mention it... 8) I better go and get my glasses fixed..... #-) -- Hedwig in Washington (TALK) 04:28, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Duke lacrosse accused.jpg on Commons
I highly doubt that the user who uploaded Image:Duke lacrosse accused.jpg to Flickr is the actual photographer who took the image, and I don't think that you should have uploaded it to Commons. Also, please don't review images you've uploaded from Flickr. That defeats the whole point of the template. ~MDD4696 03:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Please read my response on the image talk page. It could be the Flickr user's original work, there's no way to tell. Also, as long as you are an admin or trusted user (which I am) it is fine to self-review your images (see commons:Commons talk:Flickr images) . The purpose of the flickr review is so that images uploaded by non-trusted users can be reviewed. -- Y ar na lg o talk to me 14:16, 28 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I have speedily deleted this image. I, too, was suspicious of this image, and a quick Google revealed that it is an AP photo from http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2006/04/18/us/18cnd-duke.1.html.  Please be suspicious regarding such images uploaded to Flickr.  Thanks. --Tom (talk - email) 21:16, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok, sorry about that. I will be supspicious in the future. -- Y ar na lg o talk to me 02:40, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

commons:Commons:WikiProject Flickr
I have started this as a central place to discuss issues with Flickr images. Please take a look. Bryan 09:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:RBK Logo.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:RBK Logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;   &spades;  17:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Hello
You might be interested in this:

Lord _Eru  _(Cont)  05:21, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Brooklin redmen.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Brooklin redmen.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Unspecified source for Image:Brooklin redmen.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Brooklin redmen.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Image:HRS Jayhawk.gif
Hello Yarnalgo, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:HRS Jayhawk.gif) was found at the following location: User talk:Yarnalgo. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 12:36, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Hrslogo.gif
Hello Yarnalgo, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Hrslogo.gif) was found at the following location: User talk:Yarnalgo. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 12:36, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Cropped_Shan_Killarney.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cropped_Shan_Killarney.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 09:33, 30 May 2007 (UTC)