User talk:Yaronhad

Welcome!
Hello, Yaronhad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Air navigation did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. BilCat (talk) 23:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Help me!
Yesterday I added a small section about compass errors in the Air Navigation page. However, my submission was deleted because I did not include the sources. I resubmitted the topic, including two reputable sources, and it was deleted again. Why? Yaronhad (talk) 14:31, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Yaronhad (talk) 14:15, 8 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Dear, I must plead "guilty" for not having explained the reversals. The lack of references is one, and it still stands: for example, the complete "In flight" paragraph (largely your writing, unless I am mistaken) does not mention one single reference. I left it standing for now, but still consider removing it. Even worse, in my opinion, is that the whole text looks like having been copy-pasted from some flight school manual; and worst of all, all these details are far beyond the level of information of an encyclopedia. Please be aware that the goal is not to give every possible bit of information about every subject under the sun. Thanks for collaboration! Jan olieslagers (talk) 18:13, 8 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Sorry about misunderstanding the concept. The points I have mentioned are broad, and I tried to condense them as much as I could. I still think that the subject is worth mentioning in that section in two or three lines, and I promise not to make it too technical.Yaronhad (talk) 20:22, 8 May 2019 (UTC)