User talk:YashSInghvishen

July 2023
Hello, I'm Bri. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to LK-99 have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you.

YouTube is generally not considered a reliable source, and should not be added to articles as a source if there is another good source available. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:55, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Editwarring
You have returned this YouTube link twice now, so I'm afraid I have to leave you this warning about it becoming disruptive.

Your recent editing history at LK-99 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC)


 * I'm a newcomer to Wikipedia and lack knowledge about its guidelines, but I came across this video from a reputable source on science. Feeling compelled to share valuable information, I decided to upload it. I believe everything is in order, but if you disagree, I apologize. If you think it's inappropriate, I won't repeat it. My intention was simply to contribute more information to Wikipedia, making it easier for people to access valuable content without having to go through the journals I've encountered YashSInghvishen (talk) 17:17, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I understand you are new here, and welcome. I'm glad you replied. If someone "undoes" one of your edits, it's a good idea to pay attention to the notification that should appear in your interface when they do that. It means your edit has been reverted. It's a normal part of the bold, revert, discuss cycle. In that cycle the next step is for your to discuss the change on the article talkpage, not to just re-do the edit that was reverted. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:22, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023 II
You might want to read Talk page guidelines which can be extended to your edit summaries and user page. In particular, see the subsection WP:SHOUTING. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:04, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Belated welcome
Welcome!

Hello, YashSInghvishen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome!

☆ Bri (talk) 17:43, 31 July 2023 (UTC)