User talk:Yash Shrimali

研究技術Kenkyū gijutsu
研究技術これは研究のためだけのテクニックであり、私たちは良いマークをつけているのではなく、あなたの苦労と努力に依存するので、まずはストレスフリーでオープンな心を作るまず、あなたの主題の内容を簡単に知る必要があります. いいえ、あなたは数えません. あなたの本のページを読んだり、それをノーで捨てたりします. 試験のために除外された日の数を計算し、例えば、あなたの書籍が2000ページある場合、1日にどれくらいのページを読む必要があるかを正確に見積もります. あなたは大学生であるため、技術2000÷180 = 11.11111それはあなたが1日に11ページしか読んでいないことを意味し、11ページは1時間で読むことができるので、1時間に1時間勉強すれば、あなたは全体のシラバスを簡単にカバーすることができます. 1ヶ月と12日でシラバス全体をカバーすることができ、実際にシラバスを再授与する時間が多いことが分かりました. あなたのシラバスを理解してみてください. Yash Shrimali (talk) 12:00, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Technique d'étude
Technique d'étude Ceci est une technique seulement pour étudier non pas pour la façon dont nous obtenons de bonnes notes ok, parce que cela dépend de votre lutte et de vos efforts Donc, laisse tomber Tout d'abord, fais du stress et de l'esprit ouvert Maintenant, d'abord, tu connais le contenu de ton sujet brièvement et son caractère unique Ok alors vous comptez non. Pages de votre livre que vous lisez et ensuite faites-le par non. De jours laissés à l'écart pour les examens et vous obtenez l'estimation exacte de la quantité de pages que vous devez lire dans un jour pour, par exemple, si votre livre a 2000 pages. Si vous êtes étudiant, alors vous avez 180 jours dans un semestre, donc selon mon Technique 2000 ÷ 180 = 11.11111, cela signifie que vous ne pouvez lire que 11 pages par jour et que 11 pages peuvent être lisibles facilement en une heure, donc si vous étudiez une heure par jour, vous couvrez complètement votre syllabus mais si vous étudiez quatre heures en Un jour où vous trouvez que vous pourriez couvrir tout votre syllabus en un mois et 12 jours et que vous avez beaucoup de temps pour révéler votre syllabus en fait, vous devriez répéter un programme complet huit fois par semestre. Veuillez essayer de comprendre votre syllabus et ne pas avancer Yash Shrimali (talk) 12:00, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Studientechnik
Study-TechnikDies ist Technik nur für das Studium nicht für, wie wir Akzente gute Noten ok, weil es hängt von Ihrem Kampf und Bemühungen So, lassen Sie sich an erster Stelle machen stressfreien und offenen Geist Nun, zuerst sollten Sie wissen, Ihr Thema Inhalt kurz und seine Einzigartigkeit Ok dann zählst du nein Seiten deines Buches, die du lesen wirst und es dann nein nennst Von Tagen ausgelassen für Prüfungen und dann erhalten Sie genaue Schätzung, wie viel Seiten müssen Sie in einem Tag lesen, zum Beispiel, wenn Ihr Buch haben 2000 Seiten. Wenn Sie College-Student sind, so haben Sie 180 Tage in einem Semester so nach meinem Technik 2000 ÷ 180 = 11.11111 bedeutet es, dass du nur 11 Seiten am Tag liest und 11 Seiten in einer Stunde leicht lesbar sind, also wenn du eine Stunde am Tag studierst, deckst du einfach deinen ganzen Lehrplan ab, aber wenn du vier Stunden lang studierst Ein Tag, den Sie finden, dass Sie Ihren ganzen Lehrplan in einem Monat und 12 Tagen abdecken können und Sie haben viel Zeit, Ihren Lehrplan zu revidieren, sollten Sie den ganzen Lehrplan achtmal im Semester revidieren. Versuchen Sie bitte, Ihren Lehrplan zu verstehen und nicht zu zermalmen Yash Shrimali (talk) 12:01, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Study techniques


A tag has been placed on Study techniques requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. - MrX 14:02, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Extompore(Technique)


A tag has been placed on Extompore(Technique) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 15:07, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of An interlude of partical


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on An interlude of partical requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JamesG5 (talk) 08:49, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Reason why you are WP:BLOCKED
Hello Yash Shrimali, and thank you for your contributions, such as they are. It would appear that you are a spambot that has added Markov text to a number of Wikipedia pages. If you disagree, please do let me know. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)