User talk:Yashankit gurung

May 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ressha Sentai ToQger has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ressha Sentai ToQger was changed by Yashankit gurung (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953019 on 2014-05-03T21:22:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:22, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Ressha Sentai ToQger, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Ryūlóng ( 琉竜 ) 21:40, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ressha Sentai ToQger. — Ryūlóng ( 琉竜 ) 18:34, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at Ressha Sentai ToQger. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tonywalton Talk 01:17, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Once the block has expired, please do not attempt to make any further edits without studying the format of this, and other articles. If you wish to add information to an article please do so without disrupting the article format. Please use the time of your block to study the following: information in Wikipedia articles must be verifiable and should quote reliable sources, and should not merely be placed at random points in a pre-existing article. Tonywalton Talk 01:22, 5 May 2014 (UTC)