User talk:Yashwenee Selvaraju/sandbox

Hi Yashwenee Selvaraju Your draft article is very good. I found it easy to understand and didn’t find that I was getting lost. You also have a lot of very useful information. You do need more information on the History, Headquarter, Anti-Terrorism Laws, and Expenditure, as you know. If possible, I would suggest more information on the attacks if you are able to get more surrounding them. Just a comment on University involvements would that fall under the subcategory of involvements instead of safety measures and Efforts. Another section that could use more information would be criticism. The section on Al Chaidar was interesting but it would be better if there was more on criticism. You do have a lot of sources which is very good, you did a good job of taking a neutral standpoint while presenting the information to the reader. I like how much information you were able to gather considering how little was on the page before. The organization Structure appears to be the same as the original article. Are there any more involvements that could be added? Overall there is room for more information, for example, the empty headers, however, the information that you do have is very detailed and to the point. Overall you did a wonderful job presenting the information at a level that is easy to comprehend and follow. I really enjoyed your article and good luck! I hope this was helpful!

Hello, Thank you for your feedback! Thanks for pointing it out, I will expand on History, Headquarter, Anti-Terrorism Laws, and Expenditure as I am in the process of still finding more information about it from reliable sources. At the moment, my main issues are finding sources that are peer-reviewed and not merely derived from news articles and government websites. I am thinking of expanding on other terrorist attacks that the NACT have been involved in and I am about to look for specific ways in which the NACT have intercepted. Regarding the 'University Involvements' section, I believe I did put it into the right subcategory of 'Safety Measurements and Efforts' as it in reference to universities around Indonesia taking safety efforts to cooperate with NACT and not NACT being involved in terrorism acts in university, which would only then fall into the subcategory of 'Involvements' such as the incidents in University of Riau. Yes, thank you for pointing out the lack of expansion on the 'Criticism' section, Al Chaidar did have a lot to say about his views on NACT. I will be sure to include more of that and use several different resources to refer to while I'm at it. Again, thank you for your feedback. Cheers! Yashwenee Selvaraju (talk) 02:29, 18 March 2019 (UTC)