User talk:YasmaniGrandahl/Pre workout

Peer Review
I left a peer review for you in the peer review page for this article. I also copied what I wrote below so you can find it more easily.

Lead:

The lead looks copied from the article. I think the lead looks inclusive of what is in the article, without having unnecessary information. I think the lead could be edited to be more concise. This is something you could work on editing. The lead does cover a few things that are covered in sections in the article.

Content:

I'm not sure what was added to this. I struggled to find any differences between what you had and what the article already has. What did you add?

Tone and Balance:

The tone is neutral in the article. I don't notice any biases to in the article. There is a lot of sources that range in dates. The most recent date I saw was from 2019, is there any more recent sources that you could use to add information to this article? Maybe in the history section you could add any aspects of underrepresented viewpoints.

Sources and References:

There are a lot of references already listed in the article. I think that you could try to find and add some updated sources and information to this article. I think there should be some new information, since I have heard about this more in recent years. The two articles in your bibliography are not that recent. Is there anything more recent? Anything about this on trusted health websites?

Organization:

I think the article is well organized into sections, but the sections could be reordered. I think after the history section, the side effects and benefits sections should go next before the ingredients. This is something you could change.

Images and Media:

There are no images for this article, is there an image you could add to make this article more appealing?

Overall, I think this article could use some updating, organizing and some pictures added. I'm sorry if I missed any of the additions you made. Blainethesquirrel (talk) 03:52, 19 October 2022 (UTC)