User talk:Yatindrakumar0212

Speedy deletion nomination of Bigkhan.com
Hello Yatindrakumar0212,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bigkhan.com for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 12:22, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! - Happysailor  (Talk) 20:15, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Bigkhan.com is not a significant media agency and should not be mentioned in articles
Greetings! I've undone an edit you made to Kareena Kapoor Khan that talked about her winning an award from Bigkhan.com. The problem is, that site is a blog created by a student. Therefore, the awards it gives are not significant enough to be mentioned.

If you think the awards should be mentioned, you'll need to show where the awards have been written about by reliable sources independent of Bigkhan. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 17:38, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Kareena Kapoor Khan. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 01:39, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Salman Khan. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —C.Fred (talk) 01:47, 26 November 2013 (UTC)


 * This is especially true since you have declared that you write for the website in question. You should not add links to your employer, publications, or any other topic with which you have a conflict of interest. —C.Fred (talk) 01:50, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
This is your last warning. The next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Shahrukh Khan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BollyJeff &#124;  talk  13:58, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I have deleted the article Bigkhan.com and protected it from re-creation. The article made no claim of notability or significance, and (given the rest of your edits) it may have been created to promote it. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 04:18, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Please stop creating articles about your website, or adding links to your reviews to articles. I am on the verge of blocking you from editing as a single-purpose account, so please don't push your luck. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 04:28, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Please see the inclusion (notability) guideline for web content; coverage in reliable third-party sources is the primary criterion. Since you are the author of the website, please also see the conflict of interest guideline on why writing about yourself or your own works may be problematic. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 07:16, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using Wikipedia for spam or promotional purposes. You have already been warned multiple times about the use of bigkhan.com as a source. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Basa lisk inspect damage⁄berate 08:18, 2 December 2013 (UTC)


 * You'll need to state specifically which policies you were violating that led to your block. You should also state that you understand that if you repeat that same behaviour (i.e., adding links to an inappropriate site or using it as a reference) that you will be blocked again without warning and with no likelihood of a quick unblock.


 * You should also give an example of a constructive edit you would like to make if unblocked. (You can use the format "I would like to change X to Y in article A based on reliable source R.")


 * If you do both of the above, then I will consider unblocking your account. —C.Fred (talk) 17:21, 2 December 2013 (UTC)


 * In the section above (which you had previously removed) you can find a hint what you did wrong... - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:44, 2 December 2013 (UTC)