User talk:Yawnaisian1

Gai wan
I redirected the above article to Gaiwan. If you click on the above link, or search for it, it will take you directly to the article. For more info on this process see WP:REDIRECT. KnightLago (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Also, if you search Gai wan in the search box on the left and hit go, it will take you directly to Gaiwan even though it is spelled differently. That is the beauty of redirects. KnightLago (talk) 01:24, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Flammability

 * Sorry if this has seemed less than welcoming. Please also see Consensus and Three-revert rule. Fireproeng (talk) 02:00, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Comments on Talk:Penis
Administrators on wikipedia are as stated multiple places, regarded as no more special of a editor than a normal user (see WP:Admin). Administrators do not censor wikipedia's content (see WP:CENSOR). No one is really in charge of wikipedia as a whole, except Jimbo Wales and a few other groups like ArbCom and the WikiMedia foundation. But for the most part they don't weigh in on the day to day operations (see WP:Not and ). Because of this you can't simply ask an administrator to do something or to censor something. If you disagree with something you need to start a discussion and try to develop a consensus through debate. There is currently a debate in progress at the bottom of the talk page regarding using drawings instead of pictures. As far as your comments I do agree that pictures in the article are absolutely unnecessary and inappropriate for the page. --Nn123645 (talk) 04:37, 24 November 2007 (UTC)