User talk:Yawrate

License tagging for File:WDAM7only.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:WDAM7only.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:06, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello, I'm Newslinger. I noticed that you recently removed content from TruNews without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —  Newslinger  talk   18:37, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi Yawrate! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at TruNews that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. —  Newslinger  talk   18:38, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at TruNews, you may be blocked from editing. —  Newslinger  talk   22:28, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to TruNews does not have an edit summary.&#32;You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! —  Newslinger  talk   22:29, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at TruNews. —  Newslinger  talk   22:33, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Looks like TruNews is on YouTube, not sure what’s going on.

https://youtube.com/channel/UCr8LCsB_VXSlUUfkJFp6ANQ Yawrate (talk) 04:20, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

August 2023
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to engage in subtle vandalism by making unexplained changes to information, as you did at Real America's Voice, you may be blocked from editing.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 16:52, 4 August 2023 (UTC)


 * I was only correcting the post of misinformation as a fact, this is supposed to be a fact based page why not try to keep it unbiased? It seems like a pattern of labeling certain pages with labeled that are opinion not fact. Yawrate (talk) 17:36, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I guess this explains it.
 * Because Wikipedia cannot be considered a reliable source, the use of Wikipedia is not accepted in many schools and universities in writing a formal paper, and some educational institutions have banned it as a primary source while others have limited its use to only a pointer to external sources.
 * -source- GOOGLE Yawrate (talk) 17:39, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
 * 'Messaging' undermines what is cited by a neutral source, and has been reverted on this page many times before. And if you're here for debating that point and our reliability, I suggest you go elsewhere or find a less controversial topic field to edit about.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 19:08, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
 * My point is, why should a source of fact? Yawrate (talk) 19:32, 4 August 2023 (UTC)