User talk:Yay Dad/Archive

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hey, Yay Dad, welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for creating TV-PG/TV-PG-V. We do already have a pretty similar article at TV Parental Guidelines, so what I've done is turn that page into what's called a redirect. Now, if you click on a link that reads TV-PG/TV-PG-V, it'll take you straight to the main article. I hope that's okay! It looked like what you were trying to do. Anyway, thanks again! Redirects are actually really helpful, so making new ones is a good thing. If you have any questions about this, or about anything else really, you're more than welcome to ask me on my talk page. You can also try out the Teahouse, which is a place for new users to get answers to their questions in a friendly, relaxed environment. Wikipedia can be a pretty tricky place at times, so don't be shy about asking any questions that occur to you! Happy editing, and again, welcome! Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 03:33, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tree for Two


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Taroaldo   ✉   02:58, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

VisualEditor
Hey Yay Dad :). Thanks so much for your edit here; unfortunately it looks like you accidentally added nowiki tags. This isn't your fault, it's just that the new editor doesn't directly accept markup (like the link you added) - although we're looking at ways to make it handle people trying to use markup in a better way. In the meantime, the userguide here should help with how to add things like links and references. Thanks, and let me know if you see any other issues or have any comments. Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:40, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm Trivialist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 12:15, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

On Awful Orphan, you added, "It only exists as a low pitch cartoon." What does this mean? Trivialist (talk) 01:04, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to The Lion King, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Sum mer PhD (talk) 14:34, 19 December 2013 (UTC) hi

Disambiguation link notification for February 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Golden age of American animation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Merrily We Roll Along. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Golden age of American animation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arthur Davis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Flop Goes the Weasel Blue Ribbon titles.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Flop Goes the Weasel Blue Ribbon titles.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henery Hawk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flop Goes the Weasel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Looney Tunes/Merrie Melodies stuff
My main issue is that a lot of the info is unsourced, and exceptionally minor. I'm a big Warner Bros. fan, but even I don't care what color the rings are in what year, and I don't see why it's worth noting. Trivialist (talk) 21:39, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:The 1944 rings.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The 1944 rings.jpg, which you've attributed to Warner Brothers. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 23:39, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

An off-topic question
Hi. Thanks for all the great work on the cartoon articles. Just wondering if your username is a reference to Toby Turtle? :-) Thanks, Dai Pritchard (talk) 20:25, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Hippety Hopper (film)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hippety Hopper (film), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://looneytunes.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Hippety_Hopper_(Short).

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:17, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hippety Hopper (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Carey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MERRIE MELODIES TITLE CARD.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:MERRIE MELODIES TITLE CARD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:11, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

The Shell Shocked Egg
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Shell Shocked Egg, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.vioozmoviesonline.com/movie/237261/the-shell-shocked-egg-1948.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:23, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Please do not create pages or add content that attacks, threatens, or disparages their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 17:48, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Copyvios and multiple accounts
I see what may be a lot of copy pasting from sources. Are you copy pasting?

You created and added content to The Shell Shocked Egg. Some of that content appears here at IMDB added by "Kevin". Then User:Crow removed copy pasted content from that article.

Now a new account is created that restored content to The Shell Shocked Egg. The name of that account is [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/NOOO_KEVIN!! NOOO KEVIN!!]. Quite a coincidence.

Could you please tell me what is going on? Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:24, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

My friend is NOOO KEVIN!!, I got blocked for 2 months, and he is blocked indefinitely for reasons unknown, other than the vandalism.

May 2015
Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 16:43, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Chillum 16:45, 12 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Note to other admins, I made this block based on recent vandalism alone. I see there is possibly more too this, I have no objection to another admin modifying this block as they see fit. Chillum 16:45, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SERGIO SKYLER!


A tag has been placed on SERGIO SKYLER! requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. George Barnick – Talk/Contribs 05:03, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 05:10, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 05:11, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with SERGIO SKYLER!. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Wgolf (talk) 05:12, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

SERGIO SKYLER ARRRRR WE DONT CARE

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:44, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm blocking you for two weeks because you repeatedly removed the speedy deletion template and because your attitude on this page gives off the impression that you "don't care", as you put it. Please edit within Wikipedia's guidelines or this edit may become permanent, not only for you but for User:NOOO KEVIN!! if it's decided that neither of you are WP:NOTHERE to constructively edit Wikipedia. What has kept both of you from being indefinitely blocked has been that you have made some WP:GOODFAITH edits on some pages. However keep in mind that this will not protect the both of you in the long run and if you continue to make articles like SERGIO SKYLER! and (most especially) act like you don't care about Wikipedia's rules, you will most certainly get blocked again, possibly permanently. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:44, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm actually extending this block to three months based on this and on the attack pages that you created and were blocked for back around May 12. There's evidence to suggest that the username NOOO KEVIN!! was created in an attempt to bully/attack/ridicule someone based on the content previously posted at Kevin and andy sex, Andy Yu and Kevin Mo Plays with COC, and NO KEVIN!!. This would be permanent except that again, prior to the actions in May you did seem to be interested in positively contributing to Wikipedia and you made quite a few edits. Wikipedia is not a place for shenanigans. If you want to mess around, do it somewhere else. (Although if you are legit bullying someone, don't do that at all.) I don't see where you've made any beneficial edits since you started creating the attack/nonsense pages around May 12, so if you continue to act like this once your block is up, it will be extended again. You need to understand that this sort of thing has serious consequences. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:57, 21 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Since you've openly admitted that you let your friends use your account to bully people online, I'm going to make this block permanent. Not only does this violate several of Wikipedia's policies (account sharing, vandalism, etc), but it's also a pretty terrible thing to do to another person. I know that you're too young to understand why bullying is wrong, so I can only hope that you will eventually grow out of this and will eventually understand why deliberately setting out to harm and mock someone online is an awful thing. Your friend's userpage was blocked because he made several excuses for his behavior because he didn't want to own up to the fact that he was trying to vandalize Wikipedia and bully someone online- excuses that do not hold water on Wikipedia. Since you clearly don't understand what you did wrong and you seem like you're just trying to advertise for YT hits at this point, I'm going to block you from editing your talk page as well. I don't see where you're going to contribute anything positive from this point on and to be honest, I think that you're just far too young to be editing Wikipedia in general, given your statements here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:14, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:You're An Education reissue card.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:You're An Education reissue card.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Revent talk 06:10, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Reply
Cause above SquishyZ1 (talk) 05:16, 2 November 2016 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 02:12, 22 April 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 05:55, 23 April 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 04:20, 6 June 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 22:40, 6 December 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 01:03, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Unblock Req 1/13/18
You still have not addressed the concerns raised by WP:UTRS in your unblock request of 2017-12-06. --Yamla (talk) 14:08, 15 January 2018 (UTC)


 * If Checkuser has shown that User:Corinne le bouch has performed edits similar to mine, I have made sockpuppets in the past to evade bans in the past because I was ignorant of the rules but this user is not connected to me. In fact, I have a grudge against them making sockpuppets to evade their ban on the Looney Tunes Wiki. If this is not enough for Wikipedia, if you could please tell me step by step what I need to do to be unbanned and show me an example, that would be great. Much appreciated. Yay Dad (talk) 05:52, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Is anyone going to review my unblock request. If declined, will someone explain to me what I need to do to be unblocked as soon as possible. Yay Dad (talk) 02:26, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Probably, admins are waiting for you to address the concerns raised earlier by WP:UTRS, which you still haven't done. --Yamla (talk) 12:03, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I said you should show me because I do not understand. If you aren't going to help me, then I want to request someone who will. Yay Dad (talk) 04:40, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Conditional unblock proposal-- second chance
You seem to understand that Wikipedia is not a playground, so I am inclined to unblock.
 * To be clear, you will not upload any image you did not take yourself. Screenshots of someone else's work are not acceptable.
 * No more joke pages or attack pages like SERGIO SKYLER! or THIS PAGE or THIS.
 * No more joke edits like THIS.
 * Not a hint of bullying behavior will be tolerated. No "kidding around" or "just having fun"
 * You will not make edits based on watching something on TV and describing the plot. That is WP:OR. You understand all edits must be sourced by WP:reliable sources.
 * I'm not privy to the WP:UTRS. Unblock is cotingent on those issues having been dealt with.
 * Please see WP:BROTHER. I will however take you word for it that the other person won't be involved in moving forward.
 * A checkuser might be useful in determining if you've evaded your block.
 * You understand that any unconstructive edits moving forward may result in reblocking.

I will involve the blocking admins in this discussion-- -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:14, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

I need to understand how user:Corinne le bouch Perhaps can provide insight. Adding that block evasion/using multiple accounts is grounds for reblocking. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:20, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If there was block evasion, I would recommend against unblocking them. I don't see anything active on UTRS at the moment that looks like it would be related to them. It's entirely possible that it was closed since the questions hadn't been answered. I'm going to ping since they had seen the ticket. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  16:06, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I have to say though, that I'm kind of hesitant that they want to edit North Korea related articles, as those tend to be fairly controversial articles. To be very honest, that's something I would really only recommend for people who have a good working knowledge of Wikipedia guidelines and cool heads. I'm not sure if any of these articles are held under sanctions, but I wouldn't be surprised. That's not an area that I would recommend that he work in, given the situation here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  16:10, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello! The unaddressed concern from UTRS is around who has been editing well inside of the past six months. This user has so far refused to address the overlap with that account. --Yamla (talk) 16:15, 30 January 2018 (UTC)


 * I have my doubts about the linking of Yay Dad to Corinne le bouch. The latter almost certainly edits from France as demonstrated by copious IP-socking, e.g. . This also fits the temporal editing pattern. Yay Dad, on the other hand, has used – a California address – again compatible with their editing habits. Continuing this line of reasoning, I'm inclined to think that  and  are socks of Corinne rather than Yay Dad. Finally, there's a difference in "style" between the two sock drawers. Corinne is into fairly lengthy additions, more often than not copyvios, while Yay Dad's contribution are more, well, all-round useless. Favonian (talk) 19:11, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I have no objection to your argument there. I haven't looked into the relationship between the accounts, but your explanation sounds plausible. --Yamla (talk) 20:03, 30 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Should I not be able to work on humanitarian articles, then I don't know what I want to work on quite yet. I do want to be unblocked on Wikipedia as soon as possible and I won't troll and vandalize articles anymore and I definitely was ignorant of the copyright violation rules back then. Let me figure it out first because I don't think I will continue to work on Golden Age media as often if I do get unblocked. I usually include sources for my edits and if original research is a problem, then I'll adhere to it. I always have been, except for plot summaries. I'll also try to rewrite my plot summaries if they are not taken from Wikia, especially if I wrote the plot summary myself. I was just ignorant of the policies back then.

Also, User:Antoine Lemperrière and User:455jiujo are not my sockpuppets. They definitely are User:Corinne le bouch's.

Yay Dad (talk) 05:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alondra Boulevard, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Interstate 110 and Atlantic Boulevard ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Alondra_Boulevard check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Alondra_Boulevard?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Looney tunes
Stop undoing my edits! Kofi4495 (talk) 21:21, 14 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Then stop vandalizing the article. Yay Dad (talk) 02:41, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

You can’t stop me! Kofi4495 (talk) 06:17, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

I don’t need to stop you. You better stop yourself because a Wikipedia administrator has the rights to strip your editing rights. Yay Dad (talk) 11:41, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Euclid Street


The article Euclid Street has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails to demonstrate notability beyond being a typical suburban street"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Sounder Bruce  23:54, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Valley View Street


The article Valley View Street has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails to demonstrate notability beyond being a typical suburban street"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Sounder Bruce  23:54, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 2
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Ain't We Got Fun (film) ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ain%27t_We_Got_Fun_%28film%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ain%27t_We_Got_Fun_%28film%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to The Night Watchman
 * Cross Country Detours ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Cross_Country_Detours check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Cross_Country_Detours?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Paul J. Smith
 * You're an Education ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/You%27re_an_Education check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/You%27re_an_Education?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Merrily We Roll Along

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ain't We Got Fun (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Night Watchman ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ain%27t_We_Got_Fun_%28film%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ain%27t_We_Got_Fun_%28film%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Signature
Your signature should contain a link to either your user page or user talk page, see WP:SIGLINK.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  15:29, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Colima Road, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telegraph Road ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Colima_Road check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Colima_Road?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of California Fish Grill


A tag has been placed on California Fish Grill requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Jmertel23 (talk) 11:20, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Hello, I'm Atlantic306. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Atlantic306 (talk) 13:33, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Atlantic306 (talk) 12:01, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited What Makes Daffy Duck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arthur Davis ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/What_Makes_Daffy_Duck check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/What_Makes_Daffy_Duck?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

October 2019
Your addition to Bless the Harts has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Young Forever (talk)   05:51, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Duncanville.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Duncanville.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:27, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for adding sources
But please don't add AMP links. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:32, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hello. Please do not use improper edit summaries as a discussion, as you did. Thank you. —  Wylie pedia  @ 13:50, 19 February 2020 (UTC)