User talk:Ybryan3/sandbox

Context counteracting each other or needs clarification
Avatar Project – Avatar B says, “An avatar in which a human brain is transplanted at the end of one’s life. Avatar B has an autonomous system providing life support for the brain and allowing it interaction with the environment.” While Avatar Project – Avatar C says, “An avatar with an artificial brain to which a human personality is transferred for emulation at the end of one’s life.” It seems like direct human immortality (making individual’s organic brain survive) downgraded to copying and pasting organic brain’s data to neuro-mechanic server. Does it mean Avatar C phase is leaving organic brain to die? Ybryan3 (talk) 13:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

needs further citations
[The main goal of the 2045 Initiative, as stated on site, is "to create technologies enabling the transfer of an individual’s personality to a more advanced non-biological carrier, and extending life, including to the point of immortality. We devote particular attention to enabling the fullest possible dialogue between the world’s major spiritual traditions, science and society".] Ybryan3 (talk) 13:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

needs variety of viewpoints
What are ethical viewpoints on 2045 Initiative? How will politics change when 2045 Initiative succeeds? How does different articles from different sources say about 2045 Initiative? Ybryan3 (talk) 13:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

discuss advantage and disadvantage
There are certainly debates about overpopulation in 21st century. How do professions suggest it to be overcome?

Collective intelligence is a result that many individuals get together through cooperation or competition. In other words, it is defined as collective ability. Ybryan3 (talk) 13:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Article presented in too positive light
'''PLEASE ADD SECTIONS AGAINST THE INITIATIVE. YOU ARE ENCOURANGING A HARD SINGULARITY'''  soft_singularities_create_portable_radios_and_end_the_tyranny_of_distance hard_singularities_end_people_and_turn_them_into_radio_waves 
 * I removed the POV tag; feel free to suggest sources that meet WP:RS if there are specific criticisms you want included. Rolf H Nelson (talk) 04:27, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

What sources will be useful to make it neutral? If that is what is meant to emphasize? Ybryan3 (talk) 13:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)