User talk:Ycanneh


 * What do you mean? I added one comment pertaining Essjay, out of close to 100 edits I made. I did nothing wrong and demand to be unblocked. Ycanneh 23:24, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello, please leave a message if you feel so inclined.

Re:
Hey, no worries! By the way, small point, but would you consider removing the administrator userbox from your userpage? Since it actually adds you to Category:Wikipedia administrators, and isn't that obvious that you're having a laugh when you first read it, it might be a little confusing for new people (and maybe some of the old ones :p) Hope you don't mind. Cheers! – riana_dzasta 22:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Howbout I take out the catagory and add a disclaimer at the bottom? Ycanneh 22:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * That works for me - but I do warn you that some people can be pretty hard-assed about this sort of thing. – riana_dzasta 22:46, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure, if I get anymore compaints I'll probally just take it down. Ycanneh 22:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * OK. Thanks for being nice about it :) Have a great day! – riana_dzasta 22:48, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Block
Based on your impressive knowledge of Wikipedia and it being your first day editing here (as well as removing all text here, which is an IP that resolves to Pennsylvania while your userpage claims you're from Alaska), I have placed an indefinite block on your account. Another administrator may review my block through your placement of .— Ryūlóng  ( 竜龍 ) 23:01, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Our you out of you mind? Since when is showing an "impressive knowledge of wikipedia" grounds for a block? B.T.W. I will edit from the IP you said I "blanked" to prove it is me. Ycanneh 23:10, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * P.S. Why did you blank my Userpage? What did I do wrong? And why are you ignoring me now that you blocked me? Ycanneh 23:19, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


 * You weren't being ignored; people do need to do things away from their computers from time to time. The point is that you've shown yourself to be far too knowledgeable about Wikipedia's inner workings to actually be a new contributor, which means that you're an old contributor, possibly a banned one, pretending to be a new contributor. And you've thrown yourself into a complicated fussy internal meta-mess, which indicates that you're a single-purpose account made specifically for getting involved in that complicated fussy internal meta-mess. Got it? DS 00:13, 6 March 2007 (UTC)


 * That said, we do appreciate the token effort you made to revert some vandalism beforehand. Next time you try this, I recommend you try to act like a genuine contributor for at least a month and a half before you start getting involved in the internal affairs. DS 00:30, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

I am reviewing your unblock request. If you have a legitimate reason for this secondary account, what is it? It is very clear that this is not your first account. -- Renesis (talk) 19:34, 7 March 2007 (UTC)