User talk:YellowMonkey/Archive22

*sigh*
I know I ask you for help a lot, but can you please do something about this? :( Thanks... &mdash; Khoikhoi 01:26, 6 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks a lot. While you're at it, perhaps you could protect the Justin McCarthy (American historian) article? It keeps popping up on my watchlist... &mdash; Khoikhoi 01:32, 6 September 2006 (UTC)


 * You are the man. :) &mdash; Khoikhoi 01:39, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

DYK
I finished an update, just as you started.--Peta 01:52, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I saw an update in progress notice as I was previewing it to change the update time, but there was no edit conflict, si I guess there is no problem.--Peta 01:57, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Request help
Hello! I hope you are feeling fine. I have to ask for your favour here. Could you please delete these redundant and empty sub-userpages from Wikipedia for me? Here are these pages:
 * User:Siva1979/Wikipedia help
 * User:Siva1979/Images
 * User:Siva1979/Maintenance
 * User:Siva1979/Policies, guidelines and essays
 * User:Siva1979/Administration
 * User:Siva1979/Wikipedia copyright

As you can see, I am not an admin yet, so I can't do it myself. Thank you for your help! -- S iva1979 Talk to me  01:53, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, thank you for your quick response! -- S iva1979 Talk to me  01:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Can you take a look at this?
Hi Blnguyen... just a couple of things... can you please look at the vandalism of Template:America's Next Top Model by User:66.108.64.87 because at first I was happy simply to revert but its getting out of hand. Also, you may be interested in weighing in at Articles for deletion/Susan Barnett. Thanks! -- PageantUpdater  •  talk  |  contribs  |  esperanza  02:21, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Status
Rearranged as per your suggestions. The current players (except Ganguly) are now in 'stubs, or 'not stubs, but to be expanded' as they will continue to evolve. Yuvraj and Harbhajan in 'completed' looks like a genuine error as they were hardly ten lines long when they were included there. Sreesanth et. al. hadn't played Test cricket when the list was first compiled. Feel free to update this when you expand articles. Tintin (talk) 05:06, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Acknowledged
Thank you for your explanation. I have already 'made peace' with Ragib.Bharatveer 06:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for watching my back!
Gee, I\\\'ve only been back for less than a day and my user page has been hit twice. The vandals still love me! :) Mucho thanks for reverting that last bit of idiocy. Since I voluntarily resigned as an admin, I can\\\'t block these dummies. Must step more carefully, it seems. VERY nice to hear from you and I\\\'d like to thank you even more for the reversions you did for me while I was away. You da best. :) - Lucky 6.9 07:37, 6 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Looks like you fixed a couple of things right after I left. I remember that Muslim thing! One of the things that sent me over the top, as I recall. Anyway, \\\'tis durn late on my side of the planet. Catch you later and thanks again. Nice to be back. - Lucky 6.9 07:42, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Not a open proxy
Now I´m on a proxy to get this message to you, this is not a proxy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:84.114.131.27

It´s my account. Unblock it. 84.114.131.27

Acronym
Thanks :-) My new learning for today! --Golden Wattle ( formerly known as Arktos ) talk 09:28, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

List of critics of Islam
Could paste a copy of the page you deleted on my talk page or give me a link, as I want to use the research to develop another article.--Amenra 12:26, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure.Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 22:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you --Amenra 03:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm happy to see that you did not just count the votes to make your decision on that article; you determined the strengths of each side's arguments - this is not always done by other admins. Well done. BhaiSaab talk 16:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm surprised I haven't copped much stick yet. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 22:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

khoikhoi
Why is it a personal atack? Communism is just a poliical ideology. As far as dictatorship, Khoikhoi chose authority over legitimacy and I have a natural right to classfy that as a dictatorsip. Please see Use talk:Khoikhoi on Sokhumi issue and talk:Sukhumi. In addition, please do not vandalize my user page. Sosomk 17:26, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Hello. It's an obvious perjorative statement against another user, especailly as he did not identify himself as such. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 22:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Re:Reletionship

I thank you for your kind words during my darkest momenets of my association with English wikipedia. I have redefined my relationship, and "they" certainly failed to make me out-of-circulation. Thanks and regards. --Bhadani 18:40, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Mediation move
Yes, with the history of the debate so far, there is no other way to get a resolution. Wiki e Zach| talk  20:01, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Vindhyachal House
Need your attention there. To create an article on the same day of deletion seems "too much" for me. Can that be nominated again for AFD. _Doctor Bruno_ _Talk_ /E Mail 00:35, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

CfD Closing request
There's a consensus here Hindu polits cat that needs closing. At least 10 keeps, Only one delete, and one delete changed to no vote after I helped Akash change his mind.Bakaman Bakatalk 01:14, 7 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I didnt know. I thought it was just when the issue died down.Bakaman Bakatalk 01:36, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Armed Conflict and Proselitization
Hey, I think I closed an AfD that you were in the middle of userfying. I didn't look carefully at the timestamp, I must have thought you had speedied during the time it was up AfD. Sorry about that, feel free to reclose it properly. --- Deville (Talk) 02:59, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I see that you've done that in the interim. Again, sorry, my fault --- Deville (Talk) 03:00, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Clarification
Of course nobody is contesting that creating articles for Wikipedia is a good thing. Please do not confuse creating new articles with nominating them as DYKs. The former is clearly very beneficial to Wikipedia, but is it such a good thing for the main-page DYKs to be so repetitive in character? Andrew Levine 03:59, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Grapefruit Seed Extract - Copyright Violations - Please Investigate.
Please check links for copyright infringement.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Grapefruit_seed_extract&oldid=72495019 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Grapefruit_seed_extract&oldid=72467578

Compare the info which Judith Sims wrote and the illegal info Devios and Zoe revert to. Putting or reverting to copyright info on wikipedia's website is considered VANDALISM!!! Read carefully. You will find copyrighted info on wikipedia's website. This is against the law.

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_g2603/is_0003/ai_2603000396 < Judith Sims

There is still a lot more info that I think may be copyright violations still left in the article. Devios and Zoe have broken wikipedia's rules. Check the history of GSE article. Then you will have to revert way back to BEFORE Devios put copyrighted material on wikipedia's website. This is an ongoing problem with Devios all over wikipedia. This person is taking copyrighted material and dumping it on wikipedia's website without permission from the copyright holder. Thanks again for all your help. And good luck trying to STOP Devios and this user's VANDALISM.

WikiProject Catholicism
Hi Blnguyen. Thank you for you message. I have sent a message about the vote on the Roman Catholic Church article to members of WikiProject Catholicism for them to review. Anyone not on that list (such as Esperanza) was sent in error.

This is the message:

There is a vote at Talk:Roman Catholic Church: A Vote on the Title of this Article on moving Roman Catholic Church to Catholic Church. You are invited to review it.

--WikiCats 06:49, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

OMG Another DYK!!!
--Srikeit (Talk 18:53, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Review?
Hello! I hope you are feeling fine. I hope I can have your comments on my recent edits on image namespace where I added a few copyright templates (for example, a few of them has the nsd tags. Also review the comments I left on the users who uploaded these images without any copyright labels in them on their respective talkpages. Please correct and tell me if I had wrongly placed any of these tags on the image namespace. I intend to be very proficient in this aspect of Wikipedia, so I need your feedback. Thank you for your time and kind understanding in this matter! -- S iva1979 Talk to me  22:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Yet another request...
Can you please protect Ashoka and Maurya Empire? Some user keeps removing various sections from the article, but also does it when logged out. Thanks again. &mdash; Khoikhoi 23:22, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Interesting, I just got 2 DYKs recently on Mahinda, Asoka's son and Moggaliputta-Tissa, his Buddhism advisor. Done, Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 23:26, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Wow, nicely done (for both). Tạm biệt. ;-) &mdash; Khoikhoi 00:03, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Blocked
I have been unfairly blocked please unblock me Lordofchaosiori 02:53, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * It was an expired autoblock.Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 02:23, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

currentevent
Whilst we do have to be careful when editing articles about living people, I would not say that it is always inherently a current even article. Indeed, most people only rarely have things happen to them notable enough to hit wikipedia. The current event tag is supposed to be used, as far as I can tell, to tag stories which are in the process of breaking. it is intended to warn readers that the material is changing rapidly, and to warn editors to let some dust settle rather than to add in rumours. As such, your removal of the tag from Tony Blair was correct, as from what I can tell, the heat is off for the next few days now that he's made a somewhat stronger commitment. However the tag probably should have been added a few days ago, as people were regularly adding poorly sourced or interpreted statements. That's why it is still useful for articles about living people. LinaMishima 03:01, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Courtney's block
You changed Courtney's indef block to a 1 month block. From your blocking summary it looks like you were trying to increase the 1 week block to a month. JoshuaZ 03:58, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Woopsies, I went to unblock at the time that only Bishonen was unblocked. Seeing as I was being cautious as I have been complained about for being a hardman, then I only went for 1 month. But if people want indef, then that's fine. fixing now. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 04:00, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

personal attack?
excuse me? i have no idea what you're talking about, reverting vandalism is not a personal attack, insulting someone or calling them or their work is a personal attack. I am assuming you are mistaken. But if you're not, I wonder well, what you're talking about. The link you provided was to the history page of the STD/STI template i created and am working on and a revert i made of vandalism when a uses removed hep C and D Qrc2006 04:47, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

he did vandalize the page, we talked about it, i asked him not to remove it. he admitted himself that Hepatitis C can be sexually transmittable and the the CDC and Kaiser catalogue it as an STD, wikipedia precedent is in my favor since Hepatitis C is in the STD category, him then removed hepatitis C, and also D which he claimed not to have a problem with is vandalism and if he does it again i will report him for violating the 3RR and i will request semiprotection for the page if i have to.

Moreover you said nothing of my claims of him being a vandal as the motive for you accusing me of personal atacks, you used my revert of his "vandalism" as i called it. What's you're deal? Qrc2006 04:57, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

ohhh i see what you mean know, diff being my edit summary where i stated vandalism... well i was not personally attacking him, i was just stating in the edit summary what i in all honesty thought the previous editor has just done, i think it is vandalism, how can this situation be remediated, perhaps a peer review? Qrc2006 05:02, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

do you really think i should aplogize, i dont think i did anything wrong. we had an edit war is all, i think im right, he thinks hes right. i do have a question, why did u block me? and why did u take C off? i would have not made any further reverts if asked too, plus now i cant add any other stds.Qrc2006 05:09, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Sigh, thank you. But will you unblock me from this page I will let the HepC/D arguement run its course and not do anything to it. Have you blocked Samir as well?

thanks dude, for being so helpful. ill get on it. i aplogized and asked him if i offended him, but he wont talk to me.Qrc2006 05:22, 8 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm talking to you, I'm just updating WP:DYK, give me a second. -- Samir धर्म 05:27, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

hey could you add crabs to the list, the talk page has the details, the link and what id like displayed past the | divider line thanks!, by the way the page records seem to show that you blocked me, did you? Qrc2006 05:58, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Polls:
Hi. I'm just sending out a message for a new study I will be undertaking soon. It will involve surveys & polls to gather information & trends of editors on Wikipedia & other subjects. The data gathering will involve yourself recieving a questionaire on your talk page for you to fill out. I will then collect your questionaire & combine it with data from other editors. If you would like to be a part of this experiment, or know of someone who does, place a "Yes" or "No" below this message. Remember, it's only for fun & you can choose not to fill out all or parts of your questionaire once they arrive. Have a nice day... -- Spawn Man 06:10, 8 September 2006 (UTC). P.S. I see you have your own poll... :)


 * Yes, why not? Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 06:19, 8 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Yay! Thanks a bunch! As soon as I get enough people, I'll send out the first questionaire... Spawn Man 06:20, 8 September 2006 (UTC). :)

FPC
It does do a very good job showing two admins! -- Samir धर्म 07:15, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

☆
OK, thanks for the star :) I'm very proud of having the inaugural DYK star and now I have two of them. Wow! Although I don't edit DYK-related pages as often as I used to, it's only because I'm busy with other matters and because I see that DYK is in good hands these days. I shall certainly return to more active editing if/when I have time. -- Ghirla -трёп-  11:37, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

STD/STI template
Please remove sprotect.

Again, could you please remove the protection?

Wouldn't a temporary block of the people edit warring be more effective? Atom 23:58, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * No, unless there are two guys causing disruption and lots of otehr people trying to do useful edits to it. At that stage, locking is a more preventative meaures. Thanks, Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 01:35, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

DYK
Is 2 DYK's an update becoming the average for Blnguyen? I think you're trying to catch up to Ghirla. Cheers -- Samir धर्म 05:27, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Merv Wood
Hey Blnguyen. Mervyn Wood exists. Merge? -- Samir धर्म 17:49, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 01:35, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * *Cough* That was my polite way of asking you to do it -- Samir धर्म 00:05, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 02:23, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Category:Hindu politicians
Its been more than a week. So its ripe time to remove the ugly CfD sticker. :)Bakaman Bakatalk 01:39, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Congrats
Hi. Just saw you archiving your talks. Congratulations on the neat work. . --Bhadani 01:38, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

1st poll:
Hi everyone! This is the 1st ever poll to be sent out. Please read the Disclaimer below & enjoy! -- Spawn Man 05:29, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Poll 1 - Wikipedian relationships

 * Question 1: Do you feel that other Wikipedians are as nice (or as horrible!) as when you started editing Wikipedia as a registered user?
 * A)Yes. B)No. C)Roughly about the same. D)Don't know. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.


 * Question 2: If you answered "No" above, how have other Wikipedian's attitudes changed?
 * A)They have grown nicer. B)They have grown meaner. C)Don't know. D)Other... (Please explain). E)Abstain.


 * Question 3: Are admins as nice as you think they should be? If you're an admin, try to be truthful...
 * A)Yes. B)No, they are nicer. C)No, they are meaner/grumpier. D)Not sure. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.


 * Question 4: Have you ever been in a serious dispute on Wikipedia?
 * A)Yes. B)No, I've never been in a dispute. C)No, I've only been in minor disputes. D)Not sure. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.


 * Question 5: Have you ever been blocked from editing Wikipedia?
 * A)Yes. B)No. C)Not sure. (You can find out by checking "My contributions" & selecting "block log"). D)Other... (Please explain''). E)Abstain.


 * Question 6: Have you ever met another editor on Wikipedia in real life?
 * A)Yes. B)No. C)Not sure. D)Other... (Please explain). E)Abstain.


 * Question 7: Do you enjoy communicating or working with other editors on Wikipedia?
 * A)Yes. B)No. C)Sometimes. D)Not sure. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.


 * Question 8: Have you ever taken a "Wikibreak" due to stress from other editors?
 * A)Yes. B)No. C)No, I've only taken a "Wikibreak" due to un-editor related stress. D)Not sure. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.


 * Question 9: Have you ever collaborated on an article with another editor on Wikipedia?
 * A)Yes. B)No. C)Several times. D)Not sure. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.


 * Question 10: Do you envy other editors on Wikipedia for their achievements or good fortune? Be honest...
 * A)Yes. B)No. C)Sometimes. D)I don't know. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.

Hi everyone. If this is your first time filling out a survey, read this. To fill out a questionaire sheet, simply send me a post to my talk page, clearly stating your choice for each answer. For example: For Question 1, you might choose to place on the message, "Q1: A)" or "Question 1: Choice A." etc etc. It's up to you, as long as I get the general jist of what your choices are. You have around 1 week to return a survey sheet, but late entrie's will be accepted.

Remember however, your personal choices may be read whilst they are on my talk page. I will understand if you don't wish to answer some or all of the survey due to this. For this reason I have also placed an "Abstain" choice for each question. Try & answer truthfully, or don't answer at all if you can't.

However, your personal choices will not be expressed on the survey's outcome, instead it will be part of a larger finding, such as "60% of people eat chocolate, 25% never eat chocolate & 5% of people chose to abstain from answering..." I will never say, "90% of people eat chocolate, while only Fruityman said he didn't..." This would be an invasion of privacy. However, if a question has (Please explain) or (Please elaborate) as a choice, your specific answer may be used in the survey outcome, although your name will not be. If a question does not have (Please explain) as a question choice, but your intended choice is not represented on the choice list, then feel free to provide another choice which fits your description.

You're probably getting bored reading all of this so I'll wrap up. To see outcomes of the results, see my Polls subpage. Feel free to comment on anything! Feedback is always welcome. Most importantly, have fun. Topics will vary greatly & surveys may be resent out at later times to re-assess a consensus if survey numbers have grown significantly. If you know anyone who would be interested in these surveys, send them to my talk page or if you see this survey sheet, send your own answers in! Thanks. -- Spawn Man.

Hey
Hey Blnguyen. As a DYK-updating admin, we'd appreciate your opinion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know. Many thanks -- Samir धर्म 00:04, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thx. Samir धर्म 08:41, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: Glenn McGrath
Warning removed, I didn't know. :) --Core des at talk! 05:54, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, and thanks for the vandalism revert on my userpage. :D --Core des at talk! 06:06, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Here and there.... around the place
Hi! Thanks for your concern. I am still with you guys, but lately life has been a struggle. Its nothing to do with wikipedia, just my business in general. Cheers, --Ali K 08:57, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

3RR Violation in Sanskrit article
BInguyen, Pls see Sanskrit. User:crcluver has reverted about 4 times regarding "mother of languages " edit. See 1 ;2 ; 3 ; 4.

Also see the number of reverts that editor has made today(which becomes more like 'owning' the article). -Bharatveer 15:39, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Blocked.Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 01:45, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for reverting vandalism on my user page, monkey! :) -- Andeh 16:59, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Consensus science (2nd nomination)
You closed this as "delete" but it seems like the article has never been deleted (or maybe it was restored, but the AfD tag is still up). ~ trialsanderrors 18:27, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Closed. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 01:45, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Rushbrooke inequality
Hello. I more-or-less accidentally found this article and did a number of format-polishing edits, punctuation fixes, link fixes, etc. on it. Then I noticed that no articles linked to it. I added it to the list of inequalities, and I may add it to a few other pages. Probably you could help think of pages that should link to it and add those links. Also, can you add something that says who it's named after? Michael Hardy 20:09, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

RfA
I'm not sure if I'm ready to be an admin yet. Maybe after another month or two. :) --<b style="background:red; color:#FFFF00;">TBC</b> TaLk?!? 00:12, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Jalandhar
Please - there was no intention of sounding like an "advert for a bus company" - it is meant to be helpful information from a regular traveller to people who would like to know the actual travel options. Punjab roadways and PEPSU are govt. undertakings, and I am not their advertisement agent. Moreover, you removed the train services - I took full 30 minutes to write it down and refine it. Trains have multiple options, so the best ones have to be told, ain't it? EyeMD 05:51, 13 September 2006 (UTC)


 * It just happens that Indians like a personal touch and do tend to pass on personal experiences, in terms of recommended lists and things to watch out for, since that really helps the next person. Getting such info beforehand helps avoid planning-disasters. The article you mentioned, on Sydney, is bereft of such knowledge, so a person trying to plan a trip will have no idea of how to go about and what to watch out for. That I think is a much need feature, which unfortunately until the restrictive policies are removed, would not be possible on Wikipedia. Maybe we need a travelogue portion on Wiki. EyeMD 06:44, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Sameness
Yeah, it's true. There is nothing to write about most of the ODI innings except quote two or three numbers, and after one or two innings even that becomes repetitive. Tintin (talk) 10:36, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi Blnguyen, Nice to know that you are also a physics student and interested in Cricket and a part of India-related articles in wiki. I was too busy with some work and didn't get much time to do anything with Wiki. Now i have some time and hope to contribute more regularly in whatever way i can! Thanks for the invitation to the wiki cricket project; i shall join soon! Ranjith (talk) 15:40, 13 September 2006 (CDT)

WP:FUC
Hi Blnguyen. Looks like September 9. I'm just following the thread on ANI to see whether there's more insight on the broadness of interpretation of point #1. -- Samir धर्म 06:02, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Template:America's Next Top Model
Hi Blnguyen... further to my comments a few weeks back about Template:America's Next Top Model... since it can only be edited by an admin would you please delete all the "contestants" links and leave it at judges and cycles... or even just at cycles. Some of the contestants have already been deleted and more are in the queue... and it looks messy with some redlinked and others not. Besides, the lists can be read by going to the cycles! Anyway there's been some talk about this by the person who created the template (who was formerly anon but now goes by the name StarbuckDude) and who wants "control" of it... I think there may be "ownership" issues! -- PageantUpdater  •  talk  |  contribs  |  esperanza  06:04, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

The St. Clements University AfD
Could you please close Articles for deletion/St. Clements University, I withdraw the nomination and don't want it to be deleted if the process continues. Arbusto 06:30, 15 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Arbusto 06:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Solapur,Akkalkot etc.
Ok.I am sorry for calling names to that guy in my reply.If u insist I shall delete those comments.I hope the same applies to him whenever he's talking about me with other ppl in public. Secondly,Solapur district's few villages were disputed not whole Solapur.Akkalkot was raked up by Karnataka but since its residents didnt gave a damn about it,that issue is dead.Of course u might include the details of it.But remember,Akkalkot isnt as 'disputed' as Belgaon is,so 2-3 sentences should suffice.Other point to note is,if u look at the talk pages,I dont mind Kannadi mentions on those pages,but same rule should be applied for Bidar,Bagalkot,Karwar,Athani,Nippani,Mudhol and COUNTLESS towns and villages.Frankly speaking,these edits should happen only under close scrutiny of admins as i have ZERO belief on this Kannadi editors.

I have a question to ask,can I use a photograph a copyrighted image and use it here?Note that I have not done it yet.mahawiki 05:18, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

'Generally,no'?I hope we can have exceptions to it!Their's a dearth of pics in Marathi/Maharashtra related articles.mahawiki 05:49, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

ok.mahawiki 05:56, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry
Blnguyen, sorry for my uncivil behaviour. It won't happen again. But I was really upset with Dinesh's comment on the Belgaon talk page. Anyway, thanks for the advice. I will try to be civil from now on.

--Arya Rajya Maharashtra 05:20, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Blnguyen,plz verify Rashtrakuta also.mahawiki 05:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Belgaum
Talk on Belgaon article is not dead but I have confirmed about Marathi transliteration.There's is a consensus about Marathi in Belgaon Mahanagarpalika board.If ur unprotecting it,I request u to keep a keen look on it.Rather I would request u to keep it protected for possible vandalism.mahawiki 06:06, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Trivia
Who is the only batsman to score hundreds in his very first fc and Test innings ? Tintin (talk) 10:50, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Not able to log inDineshkannambadi 14:02, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Sir, I am not able to log in today. Is there any particular reason?. Dinesh Kannambadi

Declaration of AGF Violation
Hi,

User:Hornplease has just declared here that he will persist edit-warring on 2006 Malegaon blasts and that he will intentionally violate WP:AGF.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3A2006_Malegaon_blasts&diff=75792345&oldid=75749909

Is there anything you can do regarding this user? Hkelkar 23:56, 14 September 2006 (UTC)