User talk:YellowMonkey/Archive27

THIS ARCHIVE CONSISTS OF POSTS TO User talk:Blnguyen regarding various Karnataka-Maharashtra disputes

Sarvagnya is crossing the limits
Dear admin, I request u to take some steps against this vandal,Sarvagnya.He has been lost his battles in Belgaon or Kaveri and hence he is coming on Marathi people page to show its colors.I am naming it battle because this guy is extraordinarily rude and arrogant to work with. If he can vandalise Marathi people article,I can vandalise Kannadi people article also.I request u mediate. mahawiki 10:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Dear Admin, I request you to take this continuous accusations of vandalism on me with great seriousness. You know what edits I had made on the Marathi article.  If I had to be frivolous I could add fact tags for every line on the article.  But everyone knows its not so.  Also note Mahawiki's edit son the Kaveri page.  Even there like everywhere else, he knows zero about the subject but is simply trolling to his heart's content. Sarvagnya 14:23, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Dear admin, Please note that Sarvagnya has made some nasty comments about Chhatrapati Shivaji, of whom we are extremelely proud of.Who the hell is he to question the greatness of Shivaji Maharaj?Ask him to go and develop article on that Bangalorean amma rather than defaming our idols. He has posted some idiotic comments about Rama and Krishna on Kaveri page.He is deliberately hurting our sentiments.How can he ask for citations for each and every sentence on Marathi_people?Plz see the Kaveri talk to see how this guy blabbers all nonsense original reaseach and assumes our nod for that.

To be very frank,working with these kind of ppl is a headache.These ppl are marketing Karnataka everywhere.Note,that we have removed all POV statements on Marathi_people on ur insistance,but Kannadised rashtrakuta, Kaveri and belive me, many others are still continue to be advertisements of Kannadi culture and language.See Kannada talk page,these ppl are busy promoting it as a classical language when Kannada is perhaps a dialect of Tamil! MANY EDITORS have questioned it. mahawiki 14:33, 20 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I must add that Sarvagnya is being quite uncivil in his approach. Earlier, he didn't use to comment on me, but since I added my comment on Kavery talk page he is stalking my edits and openly attacking me. See talk page of Marathi people for instance. Another thing is he is deliberately insulting us. Check out his comments on Rama and Krishna. Also, see the edit summaries on Marathi people history page. He typed Shivaji as "Sevooji". Check it out here - history. It's extremely insulting for us. He also questions the greatness of Shivaji. In short, he is provoking us without any reason. I never went to talk with him, nor have I edited any of the articles he's edited. Still he is making insulting remarks about our culture. Apart from this, I second what Mahawiki has said about Kannada propaganda.


 * --Arya Rajya Maharashtra 15:27, 20 September 2006 (UTC)


 * YAAAAWN. this is getting old.  atleast come up with different set of lies next time.  Sarvagnya 19:03, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Back to warringDineshkannambadi 13:11, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Dear sir, the same wikipedian mahawiki is back to throwing prolific quantities of includes. Looks like the war monger is back on Rashtrakuta page where I have now included useful material on Governance etc. Please contact him and explain all info has been sourced from valuable reference material as discussed over the last week. It would not bee too difficult for me to do the same on pages of his interest also, but out of civity i have decided to bring you in at this point.

Dinesh Kannambadi

Dinesh this was in accordance with ur dear friend sarvagnya's insistance on Marathi_people page.Plz ask him to stop his vandalistion and unnescessary troubles.mahawiki 13:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Please block this aggrassive userDineshkannambadi 14:25, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Dear Sir, the last message left by Mahawiki shows a clear "Tit-for_Tat" mentality that robs wikipedia of its real purpose, to bring reasonable info to the public. What someone does to one page cannot be used as a reason to throw grabage on another totally unrelated page. Please block him.

Dinesh Kannambadi

Dear admin , I am reverting back Rashtrakuta.Plz advice that guy against his revenge and Tit-for-tat mentality.Just because I edited Kaveri he added tags everywhere on Marathi_people. And its Dinesh who needs to be blocked with sarvagnya for their sheer narrow minded mentality of thinking Kannada is best, Tamil and Marathi are crap!Admin,once again let me request u to check the articles which I have been mentioning from long back.These Kannadis choose biased sources and then 'kannadise' it.Dont forget that Solapur have been rectified by u,but Rajkumar Kannada kaveri and many other articles along with rashtrakuta are NOTHING SHORT OF ADVERTISEMENTS. This guy Sarvagnya is rediculuous!!I think he thinks of me all 24 hours and perhaps I haunt him in his dreams!

To add,his friend has already reverted the article.Plz ask Sarvagnya not to create trouble at Marathi_people unnecessarily. mahawiki 14:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Comments on Karnataka vs Maharashtra
Firstly I am getting really busy IRL, so I can only make some quick comments
 * Marathi people had some lots of hyperbolic/hagiographic assertions and adjectives which are inappropriate, and violate WP:NPOV, which I have pointed out today
 * Although POV, it would not be so clever for Sarvagnya or Dinesh point this out so much given the past history - it would be better a third party do this - If Mahawiki and Arya Rajya Maharashtra sudmitted this to WP:DYK or Featured Articles any passing editors or admins would oppose due to the current inadequate level of the article.
 * A tit-for-tat citation nit-picking war is bad - wrt those Karnataka pages
 * Using a Wikipedia article as a reference is circular reasoning and is considered invalid - you cannot cite yourself!
 * I will hopefully look at the articles myself soon
 * Comments implying vandalism are wrong, and nonsensical and innappropriate threats to engage in counter-Kannada vandalism is disruption and will result in a block - also see WP:POINT violation

Thanks, Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 08:52, 21 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The heated talk and words like "warmonger" are not acceptable. Blocks will be coming if this does not stop.
 * Scrutiny in cleaning up Marathi people will lead to a good article educating the world about Marathi people sooner . This would increase the likelihood that the article gets on the front page so that people can read about the culture of Maharashtra.

Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 08:56, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry!!Dineshkannambadi 13:26, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
For using the word warmonger. Will refrain. Thanks Dinesh Kannambadi

Usage of the term "Kannadi"
Blnguyen: I have requested the user Mahawiki not to use the term "Kannadi" to refer Kannadigas or 'Kannada talking people' or 'people from Karnataka'. Other wikipedians such as AreJay, Dineshkannambadi, Aksi_great, Sarvagnya and Haphar too have requested/asked Mahawiki to not to use that word.

I hereby request your attention into this issue to avoid further heated debates on the issue. Thank you! - KNM Talk - Contribs 17:32, 21 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Though I think KNM is is right, I dont see Haphar or Sarvagnya as a quotable user on the matter. They both have indulged in name-calling. Dineshkanna... is a party to the ongoing dispute so he shouldnt be quoted. Akash is the only third-party then that has told him to stop.Bakaman Bakatalk 22:40, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * What name calling? And party to what dispute? Dont mix issues.  If you have anything to say about this particular issue, say that and end it.  There's no need to bring in issues irrelevant to the topic of discussion.  (My apologies to Blnguyen for saying this here, but I hope you dont see it as off topic and just see this. talking of name calling, unless its a case of spelling and/or grammar gone horribly wrong, he seems to have called you a 'nut'!). Sarvagnya 01:02, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Further to this: On 29th of August 2006, Mahawiki had agreed to use the word "Kannadiga" instead of "Kannadi". Please refer to this edit in AreJay's talk page - KNM Talk - Contribs 02:07, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

How low does this sarvagnya stoop!I am sorry for my poor English,I wanted to write it 'BUT'.He is trying all the techniques to woo admin!

>>*Yeah,U know what, i dont have any personal grudges against him.Nut he's surely gave in to those Kannadi vandalisers and he surely thinks I am a mindless roudy vandaliser!I feel very bad when he is being partial.<< This is the whole para,go through it again,Replace N with B,and see.I didnt have any intentions to defame admin.Sarvagnya is trying hard to get me blocked! mahawiki 04:12, 22 September 2006 (UTC)


 * It's obvious it's an honest mistake. B is next to N on the keyboard. Nut would not make any sense in terms of the sentence. Thanks Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 08:09, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Insult of Shivaji Maharaj
User sarvagnya is trying hard to prove me wrong and requesting others to 'drop a line' againt me on ur Talk page.See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Haphar#Mahawiki_and_Arya

He is crying foul about me calling u a 'NUT' which is not true.I request u to go thru that para and u might know that I wanted that word to be 'But'.I apologise for my poor English.Its very sad to see that Sarvagnya is stooping so low to get ur agreement on blocking me!His latest post in my talk pages http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mahawiki#Language_Timothy insults Shivaji Maharaj.


 * And dont hide behind meaningless google hits which only maratis can read. Interestingly, google also gives a hit for Chatripati Shivaji. So right, Chatripati Shivaji(wow.. the name sounds so coooool), he is and will be from now on..

I request u to ask Sarvagnya stop bad-mouthing and lobbying against me! mahawiki 04:20, 22 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I must add User:Sarvagnya has been unnecessarily putting tags on Marathi people and unnecessarily harrassing us with asking for citations. Just check the history of Marathi people - History. He has insulted Shivaji Maharaj in the edit summary. These are his words - (rv to my previous version because Arya has blatantly done away with fact tags I had added without giving citations. also citation for sevooji is another WP article. its unacceptable.). How can one call Shivaji as "Sevooji". This is in totally bad taste.


 * I think Mahawiki has not been that much uncivil. If these Kannada fanatics provoke us what will be do. We do get angry. But you can see that it is almost always initiated by Sarvagnya. Check out my contribs. I have never edited anything which Sarvagnya is working on (although I do wonder what he works on....apart from badmouthing others and stalking others). Mahawiki was blocked once, but Sarvagnya was never punished for his constant badmouthing of Marathi leaders. As for Kannadi term, he also uses Marati,etc. Anyway, Kannadi was never a slang.


 * Arya Rajya Maharashtra 04:43, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Will Mahawiki ever stop his nonsense?
Here's the latest -. Please note that this is in spite of you putting the "Do not use as a forum"' notice on the talk page. Sarvagnya 18:27, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

I have just responded Tipu in civilised manner.And Sarvagnya stop callinf me names everywhere.mahawiki 04:05, 23 September 2006 (UTC)


 * One more. Note that here he asks me to stop BITCHING AND BADMOUTHING.  His grouse seems to be that I had referred to him as a troll and as a bluff here and here.


 * Trolling:Now WP:TROLL defines a troll to include, The archetypal troll is the deliberately inflammatory post — saying something controversial specifically to cause a flame war. Now if  "....I do know about totures of Karnataka government against linguistic minorities like Marathi,Urdu or Tamil,but plz...."  is NOT an inflammatory post, tell me what is.  It is surely an inflammatory post and frivolous as it may be, it surely qualifies as trolling


 * Then what is calling Chhatrapati Shivaji as 'Chatripati Shivaji' and terming it as COOOL? [HERE] Plz look for Sarvagnya's post there
 * I was responding to Mahawiki's post on KNM's talk page saying that "Kannadi" has some google hits. I was pointing out to him that "Chatripati" Shivaji also returned some hits.  So his logic for using "Kannadi" was flawed.  I am not surprised that he is trying to twist it out of context.  Sarvagnya 06:32, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Kannada people are known as Kannadi.There is absolutely no insult in it.But words 'chhatripati' 'marati' 'marathoo' 'marathee' 'sevooji' 'maratyhi' are surely a insult.More so if u think it sounds COOOOL!mahawiki 06:46, 23 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Bluffing: I can give any number of cases of his bluffing.  He is going all around Wikipedia slandering myself and DineshKannambadi saying that we have Kannadised articles on Wikipedia.  It is just all over the place.  His every second edit summary has the phrase Kannadi vandalism.  And the articles he has repeatedly pointed out as being victims of Kannadisation and/or vandalism by me are Kannada, Rajkumar, Rashtrakuta, Chalukya, Kaveri etc.,. Sarvagnya 05:20, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes.U r kannadising every article possible.Why did u delete ur fabulous Kaveri dispute article where u had ranted how TN has oppressed Karnataka etc etc.Why does Rajkumar article lots of adjectives and POV.Why didnt u include that his mother-tongue is Telgu?Have u seen talk page of Vijayanagara_empire?Ur buddy Dinesh is being accused of pushing Kannadi POV there also.This is what I mean Kannadisation.Also perhaps u remember how u failed to push ur Kannadi POV in Belgaon article???
 * I have said this before and I say it again. If you have any sources to prove that Rajkumar's mother tongue was Telugu, go ahead and cite it and make the change on the article.  Nobody is stopping you.  Same holds for all other articles too whether it is Vijayanagar or Rashtrakuta or Kaveri or Chalukya.  Also, by the way, have you even noticed the number of edit I have made on Rashtrakuta, Rajkumar, Kannada, Chalukya and Vijaynagar_empire??  Its next to nothing!!  I almost have no edits on those articles.  You seem to have a problem with me regardless of whether I edit an article or not!!! 
 * I have problem with Kannadisation of articles be it u or ur pal Dinesh.Rajkumar's mother tongue is telugu.See [THIS]mahawiki 06:46, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Sarvagnya 06:32, 23 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Now this is my challenge to everybody on Wikipedia. If anybody find any instance of me making an inappropriate edit on any of those articles, please point it out OR ELSE i request the admin to come down with a heavy hand on mahawiki.Sarvagnya 05:20, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Firstly it u who needs to be blocked.Dont u have another work except bitching against me.Stop it t once.Plz dont think that I shall tolerate ur tantrums without any reason.Didnt u push ur POV at Belgaon article [SEE THIS],u have remved Kaveri_dispute article WHY?.mahawiki 05:31, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * First of all, come up with something new. The diff you've given is as old as the hills and not even an example of POV pushing.  It is just an edit I made to the Belgaum article just before Aksi Great entered the picture(if i remember correctly).  Aksi made some changes(which was not much different from my edit) and I accepted his changes.  As for Kaveri dispute article, it is still live and kicking and in the final stages of construction here.  Whats your point?  Sarvagnya 06:32, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh how innocent u r!!Then my arent edits on Akkalkot or Solapur as old as hills!!!I had just 1 or 2 edits on Konkani.Read ur edits neatly [SEE THIS],doncha feel its pushing of pov??

Oh any Kaveri water dispute is alive and kicking huh?Sorry that I couldnt find it earlier,but see the article isnt it shows TN in bad light???mahawiki 06:46, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * "I do know about totures of Karnataka government against linguistic minorities like Marathi,Urdu or Tamil"
 * Mahawiki, you had written this sentence in Rashtrakuta talk page, inspite of that page being tagged as "This is not a forum for discussing merits of Kannada or Marathi civilisation." by an Admin. Please let us know about this sentence of yours showing Karnataka in what light? Thanks. - KNM Talk - Contribs 18:07, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * KNM, ur friend Sarvagnya wrote some crap about Shivaji Maharaj here.Please let us know about this sentence of his showing Maharaj in what light>Thanks. Mahawiki 03:46, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Another troll
Please see another troll posting crap against Maharashtrians at []mahawiki 05:31, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * blocked, Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 08:09, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Sarvagnya's And Other Anti-Marathi Users
BInguyen, I after you warned me, I have been extremely civil, but these anti-Marathi Kannadis are just trying to trouble us. When I started improvement on Marathi people, this Sarvagnya comes from nowhere and starts putting "fact tags" on the article. Even after I cite the references he agin reverts the whole thing back. And now he goes on whining against mahawiki.

Apart from Sarvagnya, some users are again putting anti-Marathi rants on Marathi-related talk pages. See this diff. This is very uncivil. And then I get angry. This must be stopped.

--Arya Rajya Maharashtra 05:27, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Sarvagnya needs help
Sarvagnya didnt want Marathi_people article to be included in DYK.
 * What nonsense! Sarvagnya 06:15, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes!It seems so.mahawiki 06:30, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

He was badly defeated at Belgaon article where he tried to push his Kannadi POV and remove Marathi transliteration.
 * Belgaum Marathi transliteration is not a dead issue yet. I certainly intend to edit it after I finish what I am doing now and you stop your incivil behaviour.  So dont fool yourself into thinking you've heard the last about it from me.
 * Try it.I have backed it by many citations.In fact go and get some knowledge in Hindi.Try it as much as u want.But there's no 'ळ' in Hindi!!!mahawiki 06:30, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

I REQUEST u to plz go thru Belgaum:Talk] and see how sarvagnya was creating havoc unnecessarily and ignoring my citations.Even when user Aksi_great and admin Nicalp pronounced and accepted my citations this user was crying foul.U must have seen from few days this guy is continuously trying to woo to block me.
 * I am 'wooing' Blnguyen?? Alright.   Sarvagnya 06:15, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes.U r writing nonsense on his pages from ages.mahawiki 06:30, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

What would I call it?Why is he so behind me?Why he doesnt want Hindi transliterations at Vande_mataram and Jana_gana_mana,Tamil transliteration at Kaveri and Marathi transliterations at Belgaon.
 * Clear sign that Mahawiki is trying to divert attention by talking about irrelevant things. All my edits have always been accompanied by debate on the talk pages and anyone is free to take a look at the talk pages.
 * Is that so dear?Then why were u talking about Akkalkot and Solapur here?Double standards,I must say! mahawiki 06:30, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

He is a kannadi fanatic opressing everyone here.
 * I construe this as a personal attack Sarvagnya 06:15, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Then what is calling me as shameless, troll, wolf, bluff blah blah

I will not deny my mistakes I have done befor.Plz ask user:Aksi_great and user:Amerique which he claims to 'fed up' by me.I have followed EACH and EVERY advice which they gave.Since these ppl have asked me to edit anything with proper citations I am doing it.User sarvagnya is editing out Kaveri or Belgaon with no valid reasons. All he can do is rant against me.He is wasting everyone's time here.He wants to impress u to get me blocked and infact he is making other users to write on ur user page against me.sarvagnya had pleaded Bakaman and Haphar for that.Pl see their talk pages if u dont belive me.
 * Please see. Sarvagnya 06:15, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * See[Haphar's page] (..Admin Blnguyen has some background about these guys and I request you to please drop him a line about the blatant misinformation campaign these people are indulging in..)

and see [Baka's page] (...if you are so bent on supporting me, support me against Mahawiki...)mahawiki 06:30, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Ask this Sarvagnya to stop his childish behaviour.I think he suffers from acute inferiority complex.
 * Another case of a personal attack?? Sarvagnya

06:15, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Again,then what is calling me as shameless, troll, wolf, bluff blah blahmahawiki 06:30, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

He is behind me since he failed to remove Marathi transliteration from Belgaon article after which he did a disappearing act only to come back cry foul.Ask him not to take it personally and BEHAVE properly. mahawiki 05:42, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Marathi people's DYK Status
I think the important reason why Sarvagnya stalked mahawiki is that he did not want the article Marathi people to be included in DYK. We, me and mahawiki were rapidly expanding the said article. But Sarvagnya didn't want anything Marathi to go to DYK. That's why he deliberately poked into the article and added fact tags everywhere. We, simple people, got trapped in his evil games and tried to answer him but he again started distracting us. And now he has sent his buddy User:Vgowda as User:Kirtinat Kamat to again start ranting anti-Marathi comments. Check Talk:Marathi_people.

--Arya Rajya Maharashtra 08:01, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

I plead justice...
Dear Admin, It is very unfortunate that the troll Sarvagnya has vandalised Marathi people article and kept us busy arguing with us to stop making that article into DYK status.Yes he deserves to be called as troll and vandaliser.Its high time u should do to this guy who's unnecessarily bothering us.He is following my contribs and ruining every other article which i touch.Obviously he looked into my discussions with Arya, u and Bhadani about making that article of DYK status and then jumped in there.U and other users had notified us about POV and we were more than ready to correct it,but this guy started a war there.Everything cannot be backed by citations on wikipedia.His interference provoked us and article lost its way.I request to take strongest possible action against him.Why is he filling up ur talk page ranting against me?Why does he unnecessarily create issues??Plz look into the matter.Sarvagnya's behaviour is highly objectionable.I plead u to sort out this matter.

I genuinely intended of contributing to make Marathi people article a DYK.I knew there were zillions of issues which needed to work upon and we were ready to do so as u had suggested.Arya has been working hard on this article.Since 5 days have been passed,can we still attain the 'goal'?It will be very sad if ur answer is no..I demand strongest possible action against Sarvagnya. mahawiki 08:46, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Mahawiki back to tagging without proof
Sir, Mahawiki is back to tagging. The page Seuna which has been develpoed by me with a reliable source reference had been tagged without even a hint of discussion. He has called it Kannadaization again without taking the trouble to read up on history. I have told him I shall also include material from a second scholar for purposes of credibility. You may be required to intervene if he continues to Tag it. Dineshkannambadi 14:43, 25 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The reliable source that Dinesh refers to is "Kamat's Potpourri", a totally Kannada nationalist forum with an equally fanatic author/owner infamous in Maharashtra for his anti-Marathi bias. And to say he is reliable is tomfoolery. Mahawiki did the right thing by tagging the article. In fact, I only informed him about this. I didnt tag the article myself since I wasnt so sure about Yadavas but that was only because of this article by Kannadabadi. We have been taught in school that Yadavas were Marathi, and what is this ? This guy seems hellbent on propogating Kannadi culture everywhere. Look at the articles he has created - Great Kannada Expansion, and so on... The scholars he qoutes are total Kannadi fanatics. Please stop this Kannadization, for God's sake


 * -  Arya   Raj ya  महाराष्ट्र  15:05, 25 September 2006 (UTC)


 * First of all, Dinesh hasnt quoted from Kamat's Potpourri. And second of all, the Kamat of Kamat's Potpourri and Suryanath Kamath(who is the one who has been cited) are not related in any way. Number three, the Kamats who run Kamat's Potpourri are highly celebrated and respected historians in their own right. Number four, branding anybody who has views opposed to yours(never mind that your views are uninformed at best and novice or worse at worst) as fanatics is and will certainly be considered incivility on Wikipedia.  Refrain from doing that.  If you have any sources to cite other than your own POV, please do so, discuss on the talk page and we can certainly make any changes if warranted.  Until then, stop raising a hue and cry about every article that mentions the word "Kannada".  Sarvagnya 18:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Dear admin, This is a classic case of cultural invasion.i intend to prepare a new article for Yadava dynasty.I request u to see the article Sauna and see how Kannada is being glorified against Marathi and Sanskrit.Instrestingly all articles created by Dinesh has that notorious books 'of history of Karnataka' by some Kamath.He seems to be a good fiction writer than historian.Note that Telgu wikipedians have also objected the rediculuous premise of Vijayanagara_empire article.This is the worst case of POV pushing in Wikipedia.Mahawiki 09:11, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Mahawiki
Hi dear Admin,

This is to bring to your notice the wiki-feud I've been having with User:Mahawiki for almost one month now. It started with the Belgaum page which went to mediation, warnings were handed out to both parties, and when Mahawiki's incivil ways continued, Admin:Bluyugen handed him a warning and then a block. Find that.

I do not want to turn the clock back and go through all those content disputes again. Infact, I dont want to present to you the details of any content dispute we've had. All I want to present to you is the brazen incivility and personal attacks being committed by User:Mahawiki either in the course of his content disputes or even simply just out of spite.

All the diffs(exhibiting his incivility and personal attacks) I provide below are from '''AFTER, I REPEAT, "AFTER". ADMIN BLUGYUEN INTERVENED, WARNED ALL OF US, AND HANDED MAHAWIKI A BLOCK.

Please find below dozens of instances of blatant incivility and personal attacks by User:Mahawiki either on me or on User:Dineshkannambadi and all Kannadigas in general. His remarks are in extremely bad taste and counterproductive resulting in undermining of the good faith efforts of the other editors to carry on editing their articles.

While I dont want to go into each and every diff and explain it, just to give you a sample of his incivility, he has made edits where, even if only in jest or sarcasm, he makes atrocious claims like, I am on a kill Mahawiki mission, that User:Dineshkannambadi is the Kannada (Bin) Laden(sic). In another edit, even if only for jest(which I certainly dont find amusing nor appreciate esp., when it comes from him), he has threatened to sue me. He has called us cultural TERRORISTS, losers, notorious, shameless etc., etc. He uses the word vandalism like one would use 'Hi' and 'Hello'.

Find all the above and much much much more in the diffs I've provided below. '''Whats worse is his antics are going unchecked because Admin:Blugyen who knows about our feud is on a wikibreak and Admin:Sundar whose intervention I've sought more than once, is busy with other things(I presume, in real life) - which ofcourse, I dont hold against either of them.

But wikipedia will be a poorer place if brazen incivility like this goes unchecked for weeks simply because many admins dont know about it or the ones who know are by force of circumstances, too busy to deal with it.

I request immediate and harsh action on Mahawiki.

Once again, let me remind everyone that in the links below, none of them pertain to any content disputes. I belive in dealing with the content disputes on the relevant talk pages and dont usually bring it out on user talk pages.

Infact, I have even not listed below, the atrocious claim he made a couple of days ago that I had deleted and later undeleted an article. Also not listed below is his blatant removal of tags I had added in a couple of articles without even clarifying or providing a citation for the claim which I had tagged. Also not listed below may be umpteen other instances of incivility and npa violations on his part that I might have missed.

All the diffs below deal purely and only with his brazen incivil comments and personal attacks not just on me, but on User:Dineshkannambadi and also highly respected historians like Mr. Suryanath Kamath et al(who have been cited in some articles by Dinesh) whom he has trashed and dismissed in the most uncivil manner possible.

Apart from this he also makes disparaging remarks on Karnataka and Karnataka politicians who he keeps claiming are oppressing and torturing Marathi speaking people in Belgaum. This is not a content dispute, this is plain nonsense and insanely belligerent language.

His incivility apart, he has made it a habit and a routine to go around all over wikipedia branding me and Dinesh as 'Kannadi' vandals bent on Kannadizing all articles we touch. Ask him if we have included any uncited material or if we has ever cited any references for his numerous claims or whether he has taken it up on the article talk page instead of on a random user talk page. His answer will be negative. And yet, that doesnt stop him from going around shouting that we have been vandalising articles!!

Anway, I dont want to veer this towards the 'content disputes' which is a whole different matter altogether. Content disputes can always be discussed and agreements reached. Let me present to you just his brazen incivility and personal attacks.

Here we go -

                                    

Sarvagnya 22:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

RFc/RFA
File an RFC/ RFA for the language dispute. My two cents can be found at User:Bakasuprman/Langwar. The war is turning out to be nasty so I have all interactions with the involved parties noted.Bakaman Bakatalk 00:12, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Seems pointless with these inquiries. I think best to look and content as personal inquiries have only lead to fights. Thanks, Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 08:09, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Why did u disappear?
Hello, Why did u disassociate from our dispute.I mean its too teadious and stressful for me to plead innocence to evry admin which my dear friend sarvagnya approaches.Unfortuantely ppl are giving in to his sweet talks.Our new mediatator has started the paece process with labelling me as 'more serious trouble maker'.This is very unfortunate.U had also started by blocking me.I dont jhave grudges about that but Sarvagnya is taking help of that block to malign me.He's posting msgs against me on each and every admin's talk.His lies about Belgaon issue continues.I think there's no justice here.One who's proficient in wiki policies and gets along with admins well is the winner.

And as sarvagnya is continuing his crucase against Maratha_empire I think I should stop being civil and counter these guys who are insulting Maharashtra with vandalism.In any ways,perhaps Sarvagnya would be able to get me blocked so why not teach him a lesson and then spade off?Mahawiki


 * I've had conferences, and university deadlines for posters, etc for this week, so I can't do any big investigations. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 08:09, 29 September 2006 (UTC)