User talk:YellowMonkey/Archive44

rfa thanks
Thanks for the support on my RFA. It passed successfully with just under WP:100 supports and 1 oppose. I look forward to serving the community as an admin. &rArr;   SWAT Jester    On Belay!  18:00, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Evrik
Would you care to take a look at Requests for comment/Evrik and leave a comment if you feel it is appropriate? Thank you. -- PageantUpdater  •  talk  |  contribs  |  esperanza  23:41, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Western Chalukyas
Could you take a look at Western Chalukyas? I was copy editing it and the footnotes suddenly became junk. I checked back in the history and User:FrontLawn did it in the middle of my edits. Is there any way of fixing it without reverting everything I did after? Sincerely, Mattisse 02:19, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * In fact, if you look at that user's contributions they are all articles I am working on -- three of them say "Undo Mattisse"!  Mattisse 02:23, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Nevermind -- I managed to find what the vandal did and fix it without undoing intermediate edits. And the Fred guy banned him. Plus Dinesh was happy. So, O.K. for now.  Sincerely, Mattisse 12:41, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Definitely, I would do the same if I was around at the time. Do feel free to report again when this stuff happens again. Thanks, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Mountain Biking on Mount Tamalpais
Hello, An article that I created as a part of Wikiproject Cycling called Mountain Biking on Mount Tamalpais and linked to the Mount Tamalpais article, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Mountain Biking on Mount Tamalpais. Thank you, Bob in Las Vegas - uriel8   (talk)  10:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Err okay. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Sarvabhaum

 * God bless u! At least u declared in open that u love Mr.Kannambadi's nonsensical FA's. Why do u took a long turn. U should have blocked me as soon as a I challenged Mr.Kannambadi's intellectual contribution to Wikipedia. Why did u act as a neutral judge! User:Sarvabhaum

You were blocked because you violated 3RR and kept on creating sockpuppets to avoid the block and revert incessantly. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikibreak
Have a nice wikibreak, Blnguyen; goodness knows we all need time away from here. Hope to see you back here at some point, whenever you return. -- Nataly a 18:42, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Thankyou. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Editor review
Hi. Just keeping you in the loop. User:Captain panda has started reviewing me too. I welcome this - he's apologetic for being a newbie, but I think the combination of his perspective and your's will be very powerful. I like to think of myself as being kind to newbies... we'll see if that stacks up, and he's a great person to judge. Enjoy your break. --Dweller 09:01, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Ajith Kumar
Good, fast revert. Is that our old friend under another name? Zora 00:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The 212.... is definitely him. However, he hasn't made four reverts, so a checkuser is supposed to be done. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:54, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Evidence
It is regarding. At User:David.Mestel (who I mistakenly refered to as Daniel in an edit summary) asked me to reduce the evidence but you are opposing my removeal of evidence. I'm confused!!! Szhaider 02:40, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Well that's a relief. I did not want to reduce the evidence anyways. Thanks! Szhaider 02:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

DYK needs update :)
DYK needs update :). --Parker007 03:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The Yellow Monkey is sleeping. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:54, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The Yellow Monkey's showing a nice being vandal warning on his user page. 04:56, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

jbull
Has admitted to sockpuppetry on Babri Mosque and made four reverts. Baka man  04:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Oh how cute, he warned you. Baka man  04:51, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Well I was waiting for one eventually. Where is this admission? Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:54, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * See this, the IP on Babri Mosque is him. Baka man  04:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I have four reverts on Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, but per WP:LIBEL the material calling it terrorist (unsourced to boot) cannot stand on the page. Baka man  05:01, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Also he made a new sock . Baka man  05:02, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Just as a heads up, I re-deleted your userpge; no clue what that was about, but it obviously didn't belong there. Since I see the magic word "sockpuppet" above, I'll do a bit of sniffing around. Essjay  ( Talk )  05:03, 20 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Btw, I warned him for vandalism. Baka man  05:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh, Shanel has already blocked. Are you sure you have unlimited reverts on Babri mosque? Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Exactly how is a building defined as terrorist? I did make a section on Talk:Babri Mosque. Baka man  05:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

The cat also means things associated with terrorism I think.. Although the guy might make an article over the incidents that occurred there. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Harbers
http://www.bigfatphoenix.com/bosey/013/plaha.htm Tintin 06:38, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Heh. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

CWC
Sorry, it's on my watchlist but I don't have time to edit much, I mostly just revert a little bit and take a look at the Rfar. I don't want to get involved in Babri Mosque, I may end up involved but I don't want to.  — N o b l e e a g l e  [TALK]  [C] 06:56, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Btw, now if you highlight something on a page it comes up with a preview of what you are highlighting above the edit box, this is annoying and I want to get rid of it, how can I do it?  — N o b l e e a g l e  [TALK]  [C] 07:00, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Unfortunately no there isn't, Enjoy the spoils of your work. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Pauline Hanson
"I'm sure if some politician talks at a rally, they could end up on the same stage as some extremists at some point"

While that's true, this isn't a random rally. The main organisers of it are the extremists. So if it happens, and there are reports that she has withdrawn, it wouldn't be random. Regards, Ben Aveling 07:40, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Please ban Holocaust Denier !
Hi Blnguyen,

please ban Holocaust Denier http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Holocaust_Denier_Vandalized_Holocaust_Article_.21. I noticed you reverted his post. I don't think that's enough. He actually deleted half of Holocaust page and wrote "It didn't happen!". Hey --- he deserves at least 7 days block for his obvious vandalism. Bosniak 08:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I already blocked him immediately. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Your block
It has been drawn to my attention that the word Mongrel in Wp itself is defined as "For humans (often an insult); a mixed-race individual", Although it indicates that its use can be insulting it does not indicate that usage is racist. This is consistent with definitions in most non-US disctionaries that I have consulted and in US dictionaries the flagging as racist is recent.

I also draw your attention to the quotation from Zackary in the Mongrel article which indicates that the usage can in fact be positive.

Absent any other evidence that you can produce that my use of the term in relation to Pauline Hansen was racist in intent I ask that you withdraw your accusation as unfounded and to me personally hurtful (see previous emails on this). Albatross2147 12:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Given your edits to the PH entry, I can only conclude that you see the "mongrel" as a perjorative term against the subject of this article and a source of amusement. Having said that I did not say that you were a racist. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Errr... so how am I supposed to interpret:

"racism :R eferring to mixed race as 'mongrel')"

Don't split hairs: you called me a racist. If you are too weak to admit this you should recuse yourself from being an admin Albatross2147 01:18, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Carnatic Music, Yakshagana - Unprotection
Now that, the Dravidian topics has finished its TFD and is deleted, can you consider unprotecting articles such as Carnatic Music, Yakshagana which had undergone revert warring over this template. Thanks, - KNM Talk 16:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Banana Bucket
Sir, I live in RSA and at my place the expression means offensive slang for vagina. I request you to change it.
 * Can you give a citation for this. I would be happy to change it if necessary. However, I do note that your IP appears to be in Turkey. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 00:34, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Sir, I don't know why mention Turkey. Were you joking? please see the article and search for words bucket, banana etc. in it. http://www.bortsportal.com/2005/11/02/vagina/
 * At risk to my stomach churning, I checked the list. I specifically does not include the term "banana bucket". Yes, it includes "banana" and "bucket", but many other otherwise innocent words are also in there - do you propose to censor any and all such combinations? --Dweller 09:39, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, I looked as well, and I see that "box" is also something which is caught in this net. However, I don't think that is what comes to a user's mind in that context. With respect, I do not see how the merging of the two words constitute a slang for an obscene term. I wasn't joking either, the WHOIS tool seems to say Ankara, Turkey. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * This term is usually used by non-indigenous males in respect of indigenous females in "colonial" situations. As such it does not find its way into print. That is whilst there are dictionaries of English slang etc. and the slang finds its way into other books and articles and can be cited, this term is used in circumstances which are not well documented. I myself have heard it used in Papua New Guinea in the 60s and 70s referring to unmarried indigenous females who were suspected of being promiscuous although such usage might have been quite localised. Would it not be better to err on the side of caution in this regard? Albatross2147 02:15, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * By the way don't rely on IP whois locations being accurate. Several web sites I work on try to restrict or direct visitors based on their IP involving lookups on massive databases. It's largely pointless. Albatross2147 02:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I've gone to WP:RFCN and started a feedback session. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Per this discussion, I reserve the right to continue using this signature. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:26, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Cricket stuff
Actually, I've never tried to make a bowling graph. I'm just not sure how I would best go about it. Obviously the wickets would be easy to do, but I'm not sure how to work the bowling average into the graph. Doing it just like the batting graphs wouldn't look all that great, as a bowler can of course never take more than 10 wickets in an innings but the bowling average might frequently be up around 30 or more. I don't know how I could get that looking good, but I'm happy to fiddle around and see if I can come up with something.

Thanks for telling me about Stan McCabe too, but I can't really take any of the credit. If I didn't start it someone else would have eventually, and it's looking a lot different now from my first version... Raven4x4x 06:11, 21 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Ah, well maybe wickets as the vertical bars and an average line, although that would mean that the worm bends down when the wickets go up (generally speaking, although you could take many wickets for many many runs in some cases....). How does that work? Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Cristan Williams
When I lecture, some want bio info and I have generally referred folks to the wiki article what was listed here. I was going to do a lecture at the University of Houston on gender issues and the professor informed me that the article wasn't there. I checked tonight and sure enough, I found that you chose to remove it. So, I have to ask why? Was it that I lecture on gender issues? Was it that I run most of the medical and social services for transgendered people in Houston, TX area? Did you feel that being the first person in America to open a shelter for homeless gender variant individuals wasn't noteworthy? Was it the whole transgender thing that pushed your button? I noticed some folk had vandalized it in the past, so were you just taking down an article that had been vandalized? Just curious about your motive.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.151.5.181 (talk) 06:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC).
 * No, not at all. As noted in the deletion summary, it was due to WP:PROD. Someone tagged it with prod, asking that it be deleted, and since nobody objected in 5 days, it was deleted under the policy. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Dont touch thalas article again thotta soorthy varai adipain!!
Leave it alone, ellaty oothapen, thala thaan naan!!
 * ???? Huh?? Very well. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:58, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

DYK question
Hi. Is it ok to nominate for DYK an article pertaining to a "King" whose "empire article" has already become a FA.? For example. King Vishnuvardhana of Hoysala Empire. ThanksDineshkannambadi 22:11, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * It is. There are no restrictions on its relation to pre-existing articles. However in this case the article is not new, and the majority is not new (80%), so it is not eligible. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I'll bite ...
What is the "temporary measure" and when will it end? I don't think it's appropriate for an ArbCom member to have a redlinked signature. Why not just make it a protected redirect to your talk page? At least then it has some utility. -- Cyde Weys 04:37, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, in late September- late October I was on a wikibreak/go slow (for my standards anyway), and I find deleting my userpage to be something of a psychological process of relaxing a little. It might sound a little idosyncratic, but I feel that it is somewhat useful to myself, that's all. It was there from before the issue was brought up on ANI as well. It should be gone by next week at the latest. Thanks, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Glossary of sexual slurs
Hello. You deleted Glossary of sexual slurs in October because it had "already been transwikied." However, the list was deleted on January 3 by Connel MacKenzie. What are your thoughts on that?--ЦпғогуетаЫе 07:21, 22 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I guess the fact that it was determined to be inappropriate in a dictionary, which was a more appropriate place for it than an encyclopedia, says something about its merit. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:58, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
 It's been a week since my recent request for adminship passed, and since I haven't managed to delete the Main Page - yet - I figure it's safe to send these out. Thanks a lot for participating in my RfA; I hope to do a good job. If you see me doing something wrong, need help, or just want to have a chat, please don't hesitate to drop by :) – riana_dzasta 07:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Hope you won't recant your support if I tell you I've only lived in Adelaide for a little over a year now :) – riana_dzasta 07:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh not at all. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

michael has gone
This is rediculous, I can't believe how far this has gone and how quickly this has developed over such a small thing. What's happening in regards to his unblock? Timeshift 14:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Two other admins did email Sarah to ask her to reconsider, but as she did not reply in time and there seemed to be a consensus that the situation would be best rectified by not having the block, I removed it, without intending any contempt or disrespect towards her as an administrator. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Michael's PA on Sarah
Hi Blnguyen. You said that you unblocked Michael by consensus. Can I ask where this consensus to override Sarah was reached? Sorry to be a pain. Regards, Ben Aveling 10:20, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, myself and Daniel Bryant sent emails to Sarah as well as the other guys on that talk page. I waited overnight Australian time to see if she was away or not, and I thought that she was away, by not replying, so I unblocked Michael because I thought there was a consensus that the removing the block might be the best way of moving on. I do not mean it to be a condoning of Michael's comments, or that I felt that Sarah to be a bad administrator or that the block was improper. I'm saddened to see that my actions have only flamed the discontent. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm sure you didn't. But I guess you see why people are interpreteting it that way.  Well, not that you think that she is a bad admin, but that you think she made a mistake in blocking him.  My preference would have been for her to flag the block at WP:AN, and maybe even let someone else make it.  Dito in spades for your unblock.  This morning I was of the opinion that Michael ought to serve the remainder of his block.  Now, I'm not sure.  But I think it is important that he be given the message that his behaviour was unacceptable.  Wikipedia works best when various editors hold different view-points, but only if they respect each other's right to hold different view-points, and IMHO, Michael forgot that for a moment.  Anyway, it's Friday night.  Go out and enjoy yourself!  Cheers, Ben Aveling 06:53, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

She did make a mistake in blocking him. We don't block people we're involved in a dispute with, not even when they're treating us like garbage. Yes, I think Sarah is great, and I don't want her to leave, even temporarily, and yes I agree that Michael's treatment of Sarah was not acceptable. But her block on Michael was a minor breach of policy, and Blnguyen did the right thing by overturning it. Hesperian 07:11, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * No, she wasn't. She's made a handful of edits to Talk:Pauline Hanson recently and none to the article that I can see.  She's supported Michael and Skyring in one of those edits . She's gently warned Michael about NPA a couple of times, eg  and  to which his response was "I've always skated NPA, [and] I'm well aware that it's our very own OR" and then he really let fly .  So no content dispute, at least not on this page.  Were you refering to somewhere else, perhaps?  The only dispute I see is about acceptable behaviour, and I think that's part of being an Admin?  Regards, Ben Aveling 13:00, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * If Michael had let fly at anyone else, I'd back Sarah to the hilt. But he let fly at Sarah, so Sarah shouldn't have applied the block. Look, I'm not happy being in the position of dumping on Sarah in what is a difficult time for her. This situation is really not her fault, and we should be supporting her. I just want to point out that Blng's actions are not the problem either. Hesperian 03:45, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I can't say that my unblock was based on Sarah being engaged in a debate with Michael. I thought that it would alleviate tension but I don't think it did unfortunately. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:58, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Consensus?
Consensus? I'm assuming you took this to ANI or similar as if your statement above is accurate and you simply unblocked after a discussion with one other admin... then I'm simply mortified. This kind of language is outrageous and the block was 100% justified. Please clarify Glen 12:49, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't for a moment condone what Michael said, but I was hoping that the unblock would make the situation less tense. Evidently it did not. I did not mean the unblock to be a criticism of Sarah's capability as an admin which I find to be excellent, or a sign of contempt, or that the block was illegitimate. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:58, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Jumping the Gun (not the Irish band)
Sorry for self-nominating and having that nomination go to waste (although things may of course become different in 6 days' time). I took the initiative since I knew that this week I was going to be able to answer questions thoroughly and rapidly, which I might not have been able to guarantee at any other time. Plus the fact that you're hibernating on DYK kind of spooked me. Thanks for the support, though. And the making up for my under-selling :) BigHaz - Schreit mich an 12:06, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Enjoy the pats on the back. You deserve it buddy. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Paul Collingwood
Thanks for the feedback at FAC. I think Rambling Man addressed your concerns, but please do let us know if we missed something. Thanks for helping us improve the article. --Dweller 18:18, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh sure, I might even edit it myself. If I know anything about Collingwood. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Plan??
Do you people (You, Nobleeagle, and others) have any plan for FAC of Indian cricket team? Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 05:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Um, Nobleeagle is the main owner of that page, but I think the main issue is to write a comprehensive history section that shows the evolution properly, then fork most of it to the child article. I'm not sure how difficult it would be to convince FAC reviewers to pass it, but to get a comprehensive history complete with all the politics etc, crowd control etc, might be rather difficult. I'd say that Tintin has the best knowledge to be able to do it however, Nobleeagle's and my knowledge of Indian cricket seems to be heavily 1990s centric. Nichalp is also interested in cricket. If you are looking are looking for FAs there is Peer review/Dinesh Karthik/archive1, Peer review/Irfan Pathan/archive1 both of whom are going to the WC and are GAs, buy neither have useful free pictures, and Murali Kartik is GA, but now dropped and has no picture. Harbhajan Singh is still the only one with a free pic - I've got it done up to the end of the Wright era (mid 2005). Hopefully that will be ready for FAC early next week. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:11, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Email
I have sent you one. michael talk 07:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Noted. I have received many emails to read though, with the wheel-warring over Daniel Brandt. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:58, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Gokak agitation - DYK
Super! Thank you! Yeah.. you are very much awake. :-) - KNM Talk 07:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your congrats
Note that while I almost played a lone hand in bring the article up to GA status, from then on it was mainly Noble and Thugchildz who pushed it just that little bit further. I still commented on the page fairly regularly. Thanks for your tremedous copyediting which was also integral. GizzaChat  &#169; 07:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your help in it too. Hey is it possible to make the FA drive a project cricket thing, where the project gets atleast one article on the main page per month, it would be like a guidline/"ritual"/aim of the project to do it so cricket will get more exposure than ever before on wikipedia.--Thugchildz
 * I think so. We did have a mothly collab but it didn't seem to keep the momentum up too well. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:58, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Sakis Rouvas.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sakis Rouvas.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –m y s i d ☎ 07:57, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I've removed it and deleted it. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:58, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Cricket
If you want me to peer review any of those articles (as an uninterested party) give me a prod when they go to PR. Although it could be dangerous, I might end up creating cricket articles and submitting them to DYK. Cheers, Yomangani talk 08:07, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

FYI AN/I
see here. Your input appreciated. Agathoclea 14:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Noted. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:58, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

RfA thanks
Hi, Blnguyen, I just wanted to thank you for your support on my RfA, which was successful with a final tally of 61/0/2. I was glad to see a strong support coming from you, as I have observed your high standards for RfAs. I hope my conduct as an administrator will justify your trust. If you have any comments about my use of the tools I would be glad to hear from you on my talk page. Thanks again! Heimstern Läufer 08:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

WP:DYK for Antonieto Cabajog
Please see revision in the suggestion page. Thank you. I centered on his being Paring Bol-anon then ordained bishop at the young age of 43! --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 11:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Please help! He deserves it. Bohol already missed out on the Loboc Children's Choir WP:DYK. Bohol needs and deserve this one now. --Ate Pinay  (talk•email) 12:05, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I can if it isn't too late. Let me see. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:58, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Deletions
I would invite you to comment on this thread where your activities are mentioned. Dragons flight 20:48, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure. Rather interesting that I am ranked #42 in all time deletions. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:58, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

RfA thanks
Thank you for supporting my RfA. It was (47/0/0) upon closure and now phase I is complete. I think the tools will aid both me and the encyclopedia. Feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, or if you think I'm misbehaving I'm always open to recall. Thanks, James086 Talk  13:01, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Voting
Thanks for informing me. I do not believe User:Kirill Lokshin is a member of ArbCom who has proposed a host of decisions against a certain group of editors. Szhaider 03:31, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, he is the member of ArbCom. Sorry for my voting. Szhaider 03:33, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Not a problem. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:58, 26 February 2007 (UTC)