User talk:Yenjielee

Welcome!
Hello, Yenjielee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Wit Busza, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! United States Man (talk) 03:57, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Wit Busza


A tag has been placed on Wit Busza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. United States Man (talk) 03:57, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia. Please help us by improving this article:
 * Articles require
 * significant coverage
 * in reliable sources
 * that are independent of the subject.


 * Significant coverage
 * We need references that discuss the subject – directly, in detail. Not just passing mentions, directory listings, or any old thing that happens to have the name in it. And we need several references - not just one. These sources show that the subject is notable.
 * Reliable sources 
 * We need sources generally trusted to tell the truth. Major newspapers. Factual, widely-published books. Or other high-quality mainstream publications which are careful about fact-checking and accuracy. Not: forums, fansites, MySpace, Facebook, or most blogs. Good sources make the text verifiable.
 * Independent
 * Nothing written by the subject or paid for by the subject. Not their website. Not a press release. Primary sources aren't enough: we require something independent.

A useful search tool--Wikipedia Reference Search Dloh cierekim  04:11, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

=

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I did not delete the article. The accomplishments listed, being a Fellow of the American Physical society, and a Full professor at MIT, are quite sufficient to give some plausible indication of importance. (note that Fellow of this society like most such societies is an elected honor, as distinct from the routine rank of Member) In fact, I think that anyone claiming a professorship at any level at a university is at least a claim to plausible importance, whether or not they are actually notable.

In fact, he's actually notable under WP:PROF because of the Fellowship--and other factors, when the article gets developed further. In repeated decisions at AfD, almost all full professors at major universities have been found to be notable, tho that is not the actual standard. Note that WP:PROF is explicitly an alternative to the GNG-- a professor could be notable under either criterion.

If it's WP:PROF, there's not even a need for 3rd party sources, just reliable sources to prove the factors of notability.

Thus, many of the comments above do not actually apply to this particular article.

However, But the article is very incomplete. He needs a fuller description of both his biography, including a full sequence of positions, and his research, including explicit references to his most cited papers.  DGG ( talk ) 09:59, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wit Busza


The article Wit Busza has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This article as written fails Notability (academics).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 18:03, 1 January 2014 (UTC)