User talk:Yenleo47

July 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe this. Thank you.

Articles need to be written in an encyclopedic tone, not that of an art reviewer. 50.131.220.134 (talk) 05:17, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:McMullen Museum of Art, Boston College.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:McMullen Museum of Art, Boston College.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 02:04, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Eric Parnes
WP:NFCC #1 policy also says "or could be created". This person is alive. The use of non-free images for the purposes of illustration is almost never acceptable. This is mandated by Foundation:Resolution:Licensing policy #3. If you have questions, please ask. Please do not simply revert, as this is a unequivocally clear violation of our policies. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 12:21, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Eric Esmail Parnes Neo Orientalist.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Eric Esmail Parnes Neo Orientalist.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:27, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Eric Esmail Parnes Neo Orientalist.jpeg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Eric Esmail Parnes Neo Orientalist.jpeg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://eric-parnes.com/index.php?f=works_alldetails&id=66. As a copyright violation, File:Eric Esmail Parnes Neo Orientalist.jpeg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Eric Esmail Parnes Neo Orientalist.jpeg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Eric Esmail Parnes Neo Orientalist.jpeg and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Eric Esmail Parnes Neo Orientalist.jpeg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Eric Esmail Parnes Neo Orientalist.jpeg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 14:50, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of M.C.K.B.I.


The article M.C.K.B.I. has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no references, no sign of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fortdj33 (talk) 16:20, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Alex Ney Moonwatcher 1986.jpg


The file File:Alex Ney Moonwatcher 1986.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Non-free image of a work of art being used as the primary means of identification of the sculptor who created it in main infobox of Alexander Ney. A freely licensed picture of the sculptor Ney himself would more appropriately serve this purpose, and the non-free use of this particular piece could only be justified elsewhere in the article if it were the subject of sourced commentary which provides the context required by WP:NFCC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:14, 27 April 2017 (UTC)