User talk:Yeonyeon1604

October 2018
Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Last Letter— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 11:19, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Last Letter. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:24, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Last Letter was changed by Yeonyeon1604 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957862 on 2018-10-20T11:24:36+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Last Letter, you may be blocked from editing. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:30, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Recent edit to Darren Chen
Your addition to Darren Chen has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:39, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Darren Chen has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:53, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Darren Chen was changed by Yeonyeon1604 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963919 on 2018-10-23T02:53:08+00:00

Hsieh Ying-hsuan moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Hsieh Ying-hsuan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 20:25, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Zeng Meihuizi moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Zeng Meihuizi, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 16:24, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Zeng Meihuizi moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Zeng Meihuizi, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 18:13, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
 * You've twice moved this back from draftspace but have added no sources - why is this? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 13:46, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zeng Meihuizi


The article Zeng Meihuizi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:49, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Where Have All the Flowers Gone (film)
Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:05, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Beauty Remains (film) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Beauty Remains (film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:47, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Beauty Remains (2005 film)
Hello Yeonyeon1604,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Beauty Remains (2005 film) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

 Onel 5969  TT me 12:58, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Beauty Remains (film)


A tag has been placed on Draft:Beauty Remains (film), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Binod Basnet  (talk)  14:32, 11 January 2019 (UTC)