User talk:Yerom

Social Democrats, USA
I reverted your edits to the article, especially because your edit summaries were empty.

I and other editors are confused by two groups claiming to be the real SDUSA. In discussions, skepticism has been made about whether either group or both are notable enough to have independent articles. We have agreed to have short statements about the two groups at the end of the article.

Given this status, it is very troubling that one of the groups, i.e. you, suddenly changes the website that had linked to the other's website, and had done so without seeking consensus or even describing what you were doing.

Please seek consensus on the talk page and abide by WP's conflict of interest policy if it applies ...).

Thanks, Kiefer .Wolfowitz 23:52, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Social Democrats, USA. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. ''I asked you nicely to use edit summaries and to discuss your edits on the talk page. Now you have resumed your changes, and failed to describe any of your latest two edits.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please stop edit-warring and discuss why this group should be mentioned? Should both groups be mentioned? Should none? Please discuss on the talk page and stop editing the main-page until we have consensus'' Kiefer .Wolfowitz 00:18, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

January 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Green (author). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rivertorch (talk) 05:33, 20 January 2013 (UTC)