User talk:Yesenadam

May 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bertrand Russell has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

I don't believe it makes very few mistakes. It made 2 with me in my first few edits on here.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bertrand Russell was changed by Yesenadam (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892484 on 2014-05-03T04:20:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:20, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Maxwell
The page was last deleted in 2011 due to two deletion discussions (one and two); policy is that pages deleted due to a discussion should not be recreated; if you want to recreate the page you will need to address the reasons it was deleted; if you are interested you can review this page for information on how to go about recreating a page. 331dot (talk) 00:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi! Ok thanks, will do. Uh, if you aren't a bot; I'm not sure. Yesenadam (talk) 00:05, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I am not a bot. 331dot (talk) 00:08, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * :-) Ok sorry. Hmm yes thanks, I did read those two pages before I wrote what I wrote. 'To address the reasons' involves assessing whether the judgments made are fair - how can I do this when the page has been deleted?! As far as the PROF vs BIO debate etc. As I've commented, this seems irrelevant to me. Maxwell is clearly notable. I don't need a wikipedia category to tell me that, although I have read a fair bit about the notability criteria etc before. If by the letter of the law he doesn't merit a page, by the spirit of it he clearly does. But I'm in the dark here without being able to see the page that was under discussion, aren't I. Yesenadam (talk) 00:13, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I obviously don't know anything about the person you are speaking of or the page; I can only suggest that you begin a discussion about the subject. You can request at Requests for undeletion that the deleted page be userfied or emailed to you if you want to improve it; or you can request that the deletion be reviewed at Deletion Review.(You could start that at the Undeletion page first, but I'm not sure it meets the criteria) 331dot (talk) 00:19, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * (Oh, that wasn't obvious to me; I thought you did!) Thank you very much for the help, very kind. :-) Yesenadam (talk) 00:33, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 16 March
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:33, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Candidates Tournament 2016 page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=710435572 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F710435572%7CCandidates Tournament 2016%5D%5D Ask for help])